SoCalLeicanator Posted September 10, 2020 Share #1 Posted September 10, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi all. Hypothetically, if you were going to treat yourself to a new lens and had the 18,23 and 55-135, what would next? 11-23 for epic landscapes? 35 as the reference lens? 60 Macro? I am put off by the weight of the Sigma lenses as I tend to do a lot of 3-5 mile walks when I take pictures. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 10, 2020 Posted September 10, 2020 Hi SoCalLeicanator, Take a look here Next lens. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Viv Posted September 10, 2020 Share #2 Posted September 10, 2020 35 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted September 10, 2020 Share #3 Posted September 10, 2020 18-56 as walkabout general usage lens. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wda Posted September 10, 2020 Share #4 Posted September 10, 2020 Just now, jaapv said: 18-56 as walkabout general usage lens. +1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sjz Posted September 10, 2020 Share #5 Posted September 10, 2020 2 hours ago, Viv said: 35 This is the one I would go for. The images on this forum make a compelling argument. having said that I have the 18-56 and it’s the most used lens I have. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruskkyle Posted September 10, 2020 Share #6 Posted September 10, 2020 I would say the 35 as no other lens in the TL line will give you images like it. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Chef Posted September 10, 2020 Share #7 Posted September 10, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) 2 hours ago, jaapv said: 18-56 as walkabout general usage lens. +1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Chef Posted September 10, 2020 Share #8 Posted September 10, 2020 If you’re put off by carrying weight then avoid the 35mm and the 55-135mm. You could probably live with just the 18-56mm and maybe the 23mm for low light occasions. This combo weighs in about 825g. Alternatively you could go wider with the 11-23mm and 60mm macro. That lot comes to approximately 1100g. How much you want to carry is really up to you. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boojay Posted September 10, 2020 Share #9 Posted September 10, 2020 I wouldn't want to be without the 18-56 for the CL, so good for everyday and travel. The 35mm TL is special but having had the 56mm Sigma for a short while I'm more than happy with it, and there is the 30mm 1.4 too, not sure why you would worry about the weight or size, think the 30 is only around 280 grams, Sigma have made a nice job of the three new contemporary APS-C primes. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einst_Stein Posted September 10, 2020 Share #10 Posted September 10, 2020 3 hours ago, jaapv said: 18-56 as walkabout general usage lens. +1 Personally I find the first three lenses for CL/TL are 1st: 18-56mm, 2nd: 11-23mm, 3rd: 55-135mm. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted September 10, 2020 Share #11 Posted September 10, 2020 I agree. The CL is first and foremost a high-level “convenience” camera and the zoom lenses fit perfectly. The primes cater to those who wish to approach “art” photography without going to the price level of an SL or M system. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louis Posted September 10, 2020 Share #12 Posted September 10, 2020 (edited) I absolutely think that 18-56 is a must for CL. 55-135 is fantastic for closeups and portraits in events. i keep 35 on my camera for every day and street photography. This is the lens I use the most. I have been using Nikkor manual lenses a lot on CL And T cameras and loved them. But the three most used lenses for me are, 18-56, 55-135, and 35. Edited September 10, 2020 by Louis 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalLeicanator Posted September 10, 2020 Author Share #13 Posted September 10, 2020 Thanks for all the replies. I bought the camera at Leica DC and was steered to the 18mm pancake for the combo deal. In retropsect, that wasn't the right choice although the 18 does shoot pictures with a very nice "feel" to them if that makes sense. I bought myself the 55-135 soon thereafter and got the 23 as an XMAS gift last year. Thinking what this photo would like with 11-23 instead of the CRON is what got me thinking about wide angle. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Thinking about photographing my new (12 week old) and first child was what got me thinking about the 35. It never seems to happen with good light. My backyard, now that I'm spending more time than ever there, is what got me thinking about the 60. Never considered the 18-56, but now I will reevaluate. Thanks again Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Thinking about photographing my new (12 week old) and first child was what got me thinking about the 35. It never seems to happen with good light. My backyard, now that I'm spending more time than ever there, is what got me thinking about the 60. Never considered the 18-56, but now I will reevaluate. Thanks again ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/313213-next-lens/?do=findComment&comment=4043716'>More sharing options...
pocholin Posted September 11, 2020 Share #14 Posted September 11, 2020 The 18-56mm Leica F 3.5-5.6 is a great choice but a little slow indoors, especially with small children. The 11-23mm lens is almost as slow as the 18-56 for indoors. I am actually considering Sigma's 16mm for those indoor and/or wide angle shoots, F 1.4, so much more responsive indoors. Not the lightest @ 405 gr but still manageable. I do love my 18-56mm lens but I am a little frustrated with indoor performance having a dog and a child that can't stand still for a fraction of a second to get a clear picture. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einst_Stein Posted September 11, 2020 Share #15 Posted September 11, 2020 (edited) 36 minutes ago, pocholin said: The 18-56mm Leica F 3.5-5.6 is a great choice but a little slow indoors, especially with small children. The 11-23mm lens is almost as slow as the 18-56 for indoors. I am actually considering Sigma's 16mm for those indoor and/or wide angle shoots, F 1.4, so much more responsive indoors. Not the lightest @ 405 gr but still manageable. I do love my 18-56mm lens but I am a little frustrated with indoor performance having a dog and a child that can't stand still for a fraction of a second to get a clear picture. Very surprised to hear complaint about slow lens in the modern digital camera. What ISO do you use? Depth of focus is different story! Edited September 11, 2020 by Einst_Stein 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wda Posted September 11, 2020 Share #16 Posted September 11, 2020 5 hours ago, pocholin said: ... I do love my 18-56mm lens but I am a little frustrated with indoor performance having a dog and a child that can't stand still for a fraction of a second to get a clear picture. Both subjects can look adorable when engaged with an object (food or a toy), or when asleep. Just seize the moments. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted September 11, 2020 Share #17 Posted September 11, 2020 5 hours ago, Einst_Stein said: Depth of focus is different story! Yes, but in general the APS-C format is not the best option for shallow-DOF photography anyway. I would recommend either an M/SL with Noctilux or Summilux, or a medium format camera for that discipline. Horses for courses! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wda Posted September 11, 2020 Share #18 Posted September 11, 2020 58 minutes ago, jaapv said: Yes, but in general the APS-C format is not the best option for shallow-DOF photography anyway. I would recommend either an M/SL with Noctilux or Summilux, or a medium format camera for that discipline. Horses for courses! My ready-made solution is the Leica-M adapter with either 50mm Summilux or 75mm Summarit which I am using for indoor table-top flower portraits. These give equivalent focal-lengths of 75mm or 112mm with delightful control of sharpness plane. Or my Sigma 70mm Art Macro lens in TL mount fitting. The latter is a little large for my limited trips in the local area, but perfect for home use where the bulk of my photography is currently done. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wda Posted September 11, 2020 Share #19 Posted September 11, 2020 10 hours ago, SoCalLeicanator said: ..... Thinking what this photo would like with 11-23 instead of the CRON is what got me thinking about wide angle. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ... Thanks again Have you tried panoramic mode? For occasional use that might suffice. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pocholin Posted September 11, 2020 Share #20 Posted September 11, 2020 16 hours ago, Einst_Stein said: Very surprised to hear complaint about slow lens in the modern digital camera. What ISO do you use? Depth of focus is different story! I'm actually okay with depth of focus. I limit my ISO to 3200 to avoid grainy pics. Perhaps I should try 6400 and do noise reduction in my computer. Take into account that I am not a trained photographer, most of the moments I search to capture indoors (at home) are dinner/past dinner time when all I have is a lamp illuminating and no sunlight to supplement. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now