DwF Posted March 28, 2020 Share #41 Posted March 28, 2020 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) This is a tougher one, well done! First, I am guessing the Kodak Gold is not fully analog, from exposure to print, that should affect the final product that we see. I am assuming the film itself was scanned to a digital file and the contrast possibly increased particularly for the skin. Given the angle here, we are unable to see the same range of values from building and shadow (that appear in the top one only) behind the subject for comparison. All that said very good! I will guess the bottom is the M9, and the top one film. It would be fun to see the same done with an M vs Kodak Gold. David HAH, alright. I hadn't seen page two with answer til just now after hitting send Edited March 28, 2020 by DwF Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 28, 2020 Posted March 28, 2020 Hi DwF, Take a look here which one is analog and which one is film. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
ianman Posted March 28, 2020 Share #42 Posted March 28, 2020 I wonder how many wrong answers we'll see with the "I hadn't seen the answer" disclaimer 🙂 1 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adan Posted March 28, 2020 Share #43 Posted March 28, 2020 For me, it wasn't a question of "crappy or not." I just saw obvious signatures of scanned color neg film in the first image. Red shadows, grain in the "bokeh" areas, and slightly blocked (but not blown) yellowish sunlit skin (pink (skin) + green (color neg crossover) = yellow.) 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted March 28, 2020 Share #44 Posted March 28, 2020 (edited) The answer is the difference between those who have shot some film for longer than the current film revival, and those who haven't? So yeah, I/we told you so. 😄 Edited March 28, 2020 by 250swb Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jankap Posted March 28, 2020 Share #45 Posted March 28, 2020 vor 11 Stunden schrieb JimmyCheng: So the answer is: bottom one is from m9 + my beloved summicron 35 iv, while the first one was shot with my m2 + 50mm lux asph and kodak gold Are you sure, that you remember the data correct? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted March 28, 2020 Share #46 Posted March 28, 2020 11 minutes ago, jankap said: Are you sure, that you remember the data correct? I'm not sure you need to remember data, it is kind of 'there'. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyCheng Posted March 29, 2020 Author Share #47 Posted March 29, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) 5 hours ago, jankap said: Are you sure, that you remember the data correct? I thought it was quite obvious. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jankap Posted March 29, 2020 Share #48 Posted March 29, 2020 vor 4 Stunden schrieb JimmyCheng: I thought it was quite obvious. No, only 50% were correct. And some had the right answer from a pure technical point of view. The second picture was over exposed for my taste. What did you try to prove actually? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyCheng Posted March 29, 2020 Author Share #49 Posted March 29, 2020 1 minute ago, jankap said: No, only 50% were correct. And some had the right answer from a pure technical point of view. The second picture was over exposed for my taste. What did you try to prove actually? Nothing, really, just out of curiosity and boredness because of this virus thing. That being said, this is actually from my very first roll of film a while ago. I never shot any film before, and I thought really enjoyed the rendering, it might be bad or boring to others, but it's new to me, and I want to see if it makes a difference to other ppl's eyes. Wonder if you still remember the first time you saw your first roll of film being developed. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jankap Posted March 29, 2020 Share #50 Posted March 29, 2020 vor 3 Minuten schrieb JimmyCheng: Nothing, really, just out of curiosity and boredness because of this virus thing. Wonder if you still remember the first time you saw your first roll of film being developed. Yes, I remember my first films very well. I trusted the ASA number, the Rodinal data, etc. and had to fight in my provisional darkroom with under exposed negatives. Thinking of what I did wrong.I changed to slide film soon. A few years ago I gave negative film another try with my Tessina (halve FF). But I shall stay with the sensor medium. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham (G4FUJ) Posted March 29, 2020 Share #51 Posted March 29, 2020 (edited) I think I still have the first roll of film, somewhere... But as it was over 45 years ago memory might not be working in my favour! Edited March 29, 2020 by Graham (G4FUJ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth3kpl Posted March 29, 2020 Share #52 Posted March 29, 2020 I reduced the exposure a bit and reddened the shadows slightly. It looks a little more similar. I can't do anything with those digital highlights but I'm poor at post processing. Pete Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/307886-which-one-is-analog-and-which-one-is-film/?do=findComment&comment=3941819'>More sharing options...
Rennrocky Posted March 29, 2020 Share #53 Posted March 29, 2020 Top are Noritsu Koki Scanner-Colors Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now