Jump to content

Voigtlander Nokton 35mm f/1.2 Aspherical III VM lens announced


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!



http://www.cosina.co.jp/seihin/voigtlander/vm-mount/vm-35mm1_2/index.html

Focal length: 35mm
Aperture ratio: 1: 1.2
Minimum aperture: F22
Lens construction: 9 elements in 7 groups
Angle of view: 61.53 °
Number of aperture blades: 12
Minimum focusing distance: 0.5m
Rangefinder coupled
: ∞ to 0.7m (depending on camera)
Maximum diameter x Overall length: 60.8 x 50.5mm
Filter size : 52mm
Weight: 332g
Lens hood: Bayonet type (sold separately: LH-8)

Suggested retail price: 135,000 yen (excluding tax)
Optional hood (LH-8) Suggested retail price: 12,000 yen (excluding tax)

Much smaller and lighter than the previous versions while promising the same level of optical quality, which will be very welcomed.
Mounted on the camera:
  

Edited by padam
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

If everything is good, 6 bit coded would be wonderful.  If anyone who can write Japaneses please send them my wish.  😄

Oh, and get ride of the silver-chrome rim too please! 

Edited by jaeger
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jaeger said:

6 bit coded would be wonderful

Which Leica lens and code would you want copied? It would never give the Voigtlander name in EXIF data, and how would you know what lens characteristics would you want adjusted through a Leica clone? 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, pedaes said:

Which Leica lens and code would you want copied? It would never give the Voigtlander name in EXIF data, and how would you know what lens characteristics would you want adjusted through a Leica clone? 

35mm Lux ASPH is fine, I only shoot raw anyway.  Or, leave it unpainted, let buyers to decide which code to put. 

The problem without the 6bit code is no control on minimal shutter speed.  I have the auto lens profile set the shutter speed to 1/focal len.  That's my major reason to have 6 bit code, I don't care EXIF. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jaeger said:

35mm Lux ASPH is fine, I only shoot raw anyway.  Or, leave it unpainted, let buyers to decide which code to put. 

The problem without the 6bit code is no control on minimal shutter speed.  I have the auto lens profile set the shutter speed to 1/focal len.  That's my major reason to have 6 bit code, I don't care EXIF. 

If it is your only uncoded lens, you know if you set it manually it will always use that setting when the camera dosn't find a code, until you change the manual code.You do not have to set the code manually every time.

Zeiss and Voigtlander both have a continuous groove that can be used for coding that is recessed enough that the markings will not rub off.

Edited by pedaes
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor einer Stunde schrieb jaeger:

The problem without the 6bit code is no control on minimal shutter speed.  I have the auto lens profile set the shutter speed to 1/focal len.  That's my major reason to have 6 bit code, I don't care EXIF. 

It's very easy to code Cosina lenses yourself.
There's a deepening (ring) in the bajonet where you can paint your code.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, james.liam said:

Paint isn’t well recognized by the M10 reader. 
 

I used a marker pen in 2011 and it has worked for M8, M9 and M10 since then. Why bother with paint?

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, J.Nordvik said:

I used a marker pen in 2011 and it has worked for M8, M9 and M10 since then. Why bother with paint?

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Hi nordvik, quite interesting

 

how did u do that on the distagon? From the scratch... 

Edited by jakontil
Typo
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidthefat said:

I wonder how it compares to the Zeiss 35mm f1.2 lens. I currently have the Voigtlander 35mm f1.2 II lens, and I'm considering upgrading to the zeiss. 

You'll have to wait for Zeiss to release a 35/1.2 in M mount...

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Davidthefat said:

Lol I meant the 1.4

The ZM is super-sharp at any aperture and distance, whether that is close-range or infinity, has 0 focus shift, high flare-resistance, and it is lighter than the 35/1.2 II.
It is so sharp that it can be unflattering to people, you can look for samples on this forum as well.
If you are already happy with the VM 35/1.2 II then upgrading to this VM 35/1.2 III one means you have a lens that is even smaller, lighter (more balanced), cheaper and more forgiving at wide apertures. I think we will see official samples within a few days since it will be available in the domestic market next month.

Edited by padam
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...