Jump to content

nokton f1.2, 35mm vs 40mm


surfmanjoe

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, FrozenInTime said:

The 40/1.2 is a lens I'm very impressed with; both wide open and stopped down. 

The 35/1.2 is discontinued, so it seems reasonable to expect an updated version within the year ( perhaps sharper wide open ).

They appear to have added a floating lens element to the new 1,4/21, so perhaps that will be included in the next fast 35 iteration. The 1,2/40 has significant focus shift, not nearly as pronounced on the 1,2/50.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have the first version of the 35f1.2 and it is a wonderful lens.  However, it is big and heavy for a M mount optic.  I don't have the 40f1.2 but do own the 50f1.2 which was apparently designed by the same team at Voightlander and it is a lens to die for.  If you don't mind the size, the 35f1.2 is great but I find myself using the 35f2.8 C Biogon since it is small and sharp, especially as a travel lens for the MP240 or M2.

Have you looked on Camerquest's web site?  Since he is one of two US importers for Voightlander lenses, he has a LOT of information of current lenses.

Edited by ktmrider2
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, gregor_24 said:

I had the 35mm/1.2 and for me it was to soft at 1.2 so i never used the lens.

If I have a 1.2 lens I will use it wide open and not stopped down.

Not my experience at all - I find the V1 to be sharp wide open, though perhaps there is some sample variation. However, big and heavy as ktmrider2 says.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the 35/1.2 v2 and really liked the look. Sharp, slightly more classic signature wide open. Just too big and heavy for me. I now had the 40/1.2 and find it sharper wide open. I don't detect any focus shift but then I'm not a lens tester. I struggle with the 50mm frame lines and am thinking of shaving it down to get the 35mm. The 40 is a wonderful lens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 1/24/2020 at 7:22 AM, cp995 said:

Better try it yourself, before ignoring this little gem ...

Because you said so, I ordered the 40mm.  😃

I've just tested it @0.7m and @ f/1.2 it has about an inch back focus.  For example if you aim on the H key on your keyboard, the H key is barely in focus but the N is more in focus (@cp995 is yours doing that too?).  Stepping up to f/2 has corrected the issue, I don't see significant focus shift yet.  The back focus also gets better when subject is about 2m away which my usual distant in this focal length. 

To answer the OP, I have owned the 35mm 1.2v2 before, hate it sold it, and now this 40mm is a much better lens IMO.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...