Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

On 4/29/2022 at 7:15 AM, Stuart Richardson said:

I disagree…for me the lens is good but not amazing (it is not sharp in the field compared to the apo summicrons, nor does it have the same snap somehow), but it puts the fantastic sensor from the SL2 in a compact package. I bought the Q2 primarily for the sensor…never had an interest in the Q. I know people seem to like the SL2S, but 24mp is a big step down for my work, which often features large prints and/or large crops. I also much prefer the SL2 sensor even to the one I had in the S3. The magic of the Q2 is that it puts the fantastic color and clean, sharp detail of that sensor in a more manageable body. I only wish that it just had an L mount, rather than a fixed lens. 

"I only wish that it just had an L mount, rather than a fixed lens."  I as well.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I bought this lens to photograph my friend horse riding, but recently I also took the lens to some walks into the forrest. Here are some images, this lens performs great!

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some more, all with a SL.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a very sharp lens. Quite a bit sharper than any other 70-200mm F4 that I have tested- I've been through a few over the years. I have found with Panasonic lenses, that you need an accommodating dealer. Testing each lens is important, as there is some variation between samples. I managed to find a very good 16-35mm, and even better 24-105mm and a stellar 70-200mm F4. My advice, is go to your local dealer, be nice, and test a few samples...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had a bunch of lenses here from Panasonic .

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

I think most of them are going back as not good enough one you compare.

P 24-105 f4, P 70-200- f4 and P 20-60 . the first 2 are going back, Leica and sigma zooms are so much better, sharpness just in the center is not enough for me in all cases. I understand this are budget lenses and better for filming.

The P20-60 finds a place in my bag to replace the M 21mm 3,4. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

24-105mm - Make sure that you click the picture 3x to see the proper size.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Edited by Planetwide
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Advertisement (gone after registration)

On 10/9/2019 at 1:02 AM, nicci78 said:

this review of the lens by pcmag, is quite disappointing about lens resolution. Not ready for 47MP. 
 

https://www.pcmag.com/review/368952/panasonic-lumix-s-pro-70-200mm-f4-o-i-s

this refers to the f4 lens. I thought this topic was about the f2.8?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

S1r & 70-200mm F4

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Edited by Planetwide
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I'm dredging up this thread as I have some interest in this lens. I have a trip to Scotland coming up in June and am thinking about something lighter than my 90-280mm for landscape shots. I'll mostly be travelling by car (with some longer walks/hikes) so taking the 90-280mm is not a major issue, but I do appreciate a lighter bag.

My 24-90mm will be my main lens. I also have the tiny Sigma 17mm f/4 in case I want to shoot wider, and will use this basically as a 17-24mm with cropping.

Ideally Sigma (or someone) would produce a relatively light 200mm or 300mm prime around f4 (along the lines of their recent 500mm, which I think would be a bit too much on the long side next to a 90mm).

Meanwhile I'm looking at this Pana 70-200mm f/4 (but I would only really use it from 135-200mm) and the Sigma 100-400mm. I've previously owned a Pana 70-300mm which is very light but I was not enchanted by its performance. The 70-200mm f4 lens seems to be characterised by (mostly) poor reviews but the shots here look quite fine to me so I am curious what you all think about this lens after further experience.

My sensible brain tells me to (i) live without the longer focal length - it's a holiday and its good to travel light (ii) just take the 90-280mm; it would be a pain when carrying all my stuff through the airport and to the hotel etc, but no big deal once we've packed our stuff in our hire car. I think it's not unlikely that we see a 200 or 300mm prime in the next future so perhaps I should just keep my GAS in check 😀 

Edited by hoolyproductions
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jaapv said:

Sigma 70-200 2.8 😉 If you read the reviews, it is a fantastic lens. Mine is coming in today or tomorrow.

Thanks, I thought about that too, although then the weight starts to creep upwards towards the heavier lenses. There is currently a second hand 70-200mm f4 with a local dealer, which is part of what provoked the question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Planetwide said:

Test the Pana lens, because there is some variation between copies. Once you get a good one, its a great lens.

I can't agree more, I returned one 24-70mm S pro and two 70-200mm S Pro f2.8 before getting excellent copies. The lenses I have returned were really bad (to say the least), sharp only at the bottom of the images or very soft at the long end.
But once you get a good copy, these two lenses are fantastic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I`m reading this with some interest because I`m about to set off to trade in my 200/4 .

Its ok just trying to cut back on kit. This taken on a CL

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a heavy crop. Again using the CL . I may just hold off cashing it in.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...