Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

31 minutes ago, AndreasG said:

And a M3 you can combine easily with a Leicameter, the M6 TTL doesn't allow this.

I must say that I am not a fan of the Leicameter (although I have two). As I said my M6TTL is fine but if it does give trouble I would probably use a hand held meter or the excellent Voigtlander VC Meter II which I use with my M4.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, earleygallery said:

Yes, it was TTL but not TTL as in an M6 TTL which is TTL as per an ordinary M6 but with TTL for flash as well which an ordinary M6 (which is TTL) doesn't have.

I think you missed my Essex humour. Yes I know all about the M5 (I have, and use, an M5 and an M6TTL) but I didn't see it mentioned in the reply re the M3.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mute-on said:

Why not just use the funds on an M3 (as a 0.85 substitute)? One certainly wouldn’t proceed with the M6 on the assumption that it is repairable. 

Yes, I agree with your second point but I'm not sure that an M3 (can you still get one for €600?) is automatically a better choice than the M6TTL. Yes, it will be better built but it will lack the 35mm framelines and you have to fanny about with the film take up spool when loading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...