Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

using max size of viewfinder of the leica, you can use 25-28mm.

Shoot 21mm and see in LCD screen for approx guess? By that way you learn to add "visual" borders in the body viewfinder while anticipating a scene. When you practice enough, you eventually learn it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with lct. Additionally I need the level provided in the EVF (240). For this singular issue I went with the 24 and loving it. 

For me the 24 was simpler, which means more enjoyable to use. in my opinion a fantastic lens- I suppose overall not that common. I wanted a 21 and never looked back with the 24.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, tomasis7 said:

When you practice enough, you eventually learn it. 

That would be the ideal goal

 

4 hours ago, rsolomon said:

Agree with lct. Additionally I need the level provided in the EVF (240). For this singular issue I went with the 24 and loving it. 

For me the 24 was simpler, which means more enjoyable to use. in my opinion a fantastic lens- I suppose overall not that common. I wanted a 21 and never looked back with the 24.

Yes, I agree, maybe the 24 it's a better overall fit. But so far, the only NEW option is the Elmar -M f/3.8, which Leica will discontinue, right? Also, $3k for an f/3.8 does it worth? I'm sure it does, I'm talking for the people like me with low budget. I don't like the Zeiss 25, and Voigtlander doesn't have 24mm. It looks like the 24 focal length will disappear.

That's why I come back to the lens of this post: the 21 CV ... 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tomasis7 said:

tried to find that word 🤣

I had crappy Voigtlander external viewfinder where I could questimate

Right... But much better an external crappy VF than just guestimate, I guess. Or if you master the 21mm frame without an external VF, better Guestimate than a crappy VF ... 🤔

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dennis said:

Right... But much better an external crappy VF than just guestimate, I guess. Or if you master the 21mm frame without an external VF, better Guestimate than a crappy VF ... 🤔

It is a bit plastic, i was worried that i might break it if I manhandle the camera whether storing or using. 

The original Leica or Zeiss looks nicer!

I have 21mm but I like the idea of 25mm because you use max size of external corners of the inner viewfinder of body 0,72x or something. 

Edited by tomasis7
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way the plastic Leica viewfinder is so plastic and -- frankly -- crappy, I hate myself spending big bucks on such a plastic item. In retrospect I should have gone with the Ricoh 21/28 viewfinder (meant for the GR series).

Otherwise I do enjoy using the external viewfinder, and I also recommend the Thumbie as a hotshoe-free thumb grip alternative. It's not as pretty as some of the shoe-attached grips but is mighty practical and works wonderfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Bought the Color-Skopar last week and used it for the first time this week on a bicycle tour. I've never used a lens as wide as this one before and I loved the handling and the sharpness. I used it on an M240 with lens coding switched off. Here are some examples:

 

Edited by NeeZee
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, distortion and vignetting are there but look quite uniform and symmetrical to me. Should be easy to get rid off in PP. The modern Leica 21mm offerings have the advantage of tailored in-camera correction, of course. Most likely they are better lenses, too ;) Still, I'm very happy with the Skopar - especially for a focal length I'm just getting into...

Edited by NeeZee
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice,

ive debated to exhaustion in my mind, the 21 SEM has such high regard, the SKOPAR had few reviews but folks like it. Had concerns around external VF. 
 

Bought the Leica 24, could not be happier!

i suppose they are discontinuing the 24’s for market / sales / demand reasons. I’m not sure why people don’t see the FL more desirable but I really don’t care, it’s the perfect compliment to my photography goals. In summary it’s sharp, small, lite, fun, and in my opinion stellar performance 

my advice at this time is to re evaluate if you really want a 21 because these 24’s will go and a great opportunity missed 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rsolomon said:

my advice at this time is to re evaluate if you really want a 21 because these 24’s will go and a great opportunity missed 

+1

about wide lenses, after the 35, for me it makes sense to step straight to the 24, skipping the 28. I would love to get in the future a brand new 24 Elmar before Leica discontinue it, it's an amazing FL for storytelling with many applications. I think it's the kind of lens that once you get it, you will never sell.

But If I can't invest for a brand new 24 Elmar, and can't find great used deals, my next option would be the CV 21 3.5

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...