Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And the eternal bag question...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

More a benefit for Panasonic than Leica i suspect in that more SL users will be interested by Panasonic lenses than Panasonic users by SL lenses but i may be wrong. Could interest me if the rumored body is smaller than the SL and can fit M & R lenses through current Leica adapters personally.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you open an SL up there are Panasonic labeled components inside...

Open up any Leica, any camera, any smartphone, any electronic device and you will likely find components labelled by other manufacturers inside. Even if not, many of the components labelled with the selling brand will have been designed and made by third parties. The surprise would be if there weren't. In Leica's case the surprise would be if Panasonic did not have a design and manufacturing input to some of the components for the latest bodies and lenses. Does that, in any way, make them less 'Leica', any more than an iPhone is less 'Apple' (which makes nothing itself) because its components are all designed and made by others?

Edited by LocalHero1953
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

That is precisely the point. However, I suspect that there is more than Panasonic parts inside, but that Panasonic design input was used as well, just like Leica optical expertise has influenced Panasonic lens design. Which , BTW, is a good thing.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Agreed.

There are often two very human opinions expressed in threads like this:

- "The more Panasonic has an input into this, the better - cheaper, more reliable, more cutting edge than Leica"

- "The more Panasonic has an input into this, the worse - it's no longer a Leica"

Oddly, you never hear these phrases with the names swapped round. Panasonics and Huaweis use the Leica name as a sign of quality and technical excellence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica make their own circuit boards. There might be some parts from Panasonic in them, I don't know.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - I did not know that it was this extensive. Glad to know. However, circuit boards are only the end product and my remark was about design rather than manufacture - and they are not the only electronic parts in the camera ;) .

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica make their own circuit boards. There might be some parts from Panasonic in them, I don't know.

 

Hahah,..apart from the lower right pic, the other circuit boards in pics does not look like they could fit into any camera body I know today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahah,..apart from the lower right pic, the other circuit boards in pics does not look like they could fit into any camera body I know today.

It is obviously fake news. The whole assembly line is set up to hide the fact that the SL is made by Panasonic.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahah,..apart from the lower right pic, the other circuit boards in pics does not look like they could fit into any camera body I know today.

Agree. On the lower left photograph that is obviously a tray of Pizzas. This is the new canteen kitchen in Wetzlar.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree. On the lower left photograph that is obviously a tray of Pizzas. This is the new canteen kitchen in Wetzlar.

That would be only kitchen employing industrial inspection microscope.

 

Circuit board in top right picture looks big but if one examines it carefully it has complex multi segmented shape outlined with dark line in the middle of the green board containing nothing. I assume on completion of printing empty surround is removed and middle bent to fit inside camera body shell. So it could be any of the company products, maybe Leica S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah- but this is Leica. It is all about precision and tolerances. How else can you inspect an olive for perfect shape?
 
 
Seriously:
 
This article states:

 

Leica Portugal is where most of the work begins on Leica M and Leica S cameras:

 

Explicitly excluding the SL.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah- but this is Leica. It is all about precision and tolerances. How else can you inspect an olive for perfect shape?

 

 

Seriously:

 

This article states:

 

 

Explicitly excluding the SL.

 

Aha, so unless SL is put together in Germany other place can only be Far East.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed that on page 15 of the 80FDTimes-LEICA-PortugalFactoryTour publication that there is a photo of the Leica SL body being milled via the CNC process.

 

Does that mean that the SL is not being made in Portugal? Or is the body milling the only step performed there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

More a benefit for Panasonic than Leica i suspect in that more SL users will be interested by Panasonic lenses than Panasonic users by SL lenses but i may be wrong. Could interest me if the rumored body is smaller than the SL and can fit M & R lenses through current Leica adapters personally.

 

 

I would be the opposite but not sure I'm representative of the majority of users interested in a Panasonic full frame with SL mount. I'd want the higher-res, lower-priced Panasonic body and at least the Leica SL 50 prime, supplemented by M primes, some Leica, some Voigtlander. I'd probably rely on Panasonic for zoom options, particularly getting something like a 100-400 range lens.

 

One thing is for sure, if Panasonic surprises everyone and uses the rumored 8K organic sensor in their full frame debut, users may abandon other brands in droves, particularly Canon full frame users who have been waiting in the parched desert for it to rain class-leading sensors. I can't see how something like this could be bad for Leica except for the Panasonic body competing with the SL2; however, if Leica keeps the SL2 within at least $1K of the Panasonic, they could stay competitive provided they share the same sensor.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...