Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Ah - now I get you. You mean the magnified area. Yes, although I would probably not use the feature. Nice but too slow. I would still prefer focus-recompoe.

 

But then it is sometimes difficult if not impossible to nail focus due to focus shift and/or field curvature, reason why this feature is useful to complement focus-recompose IMHO.

Edited by lct
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - I’ve added a few more shots (as requested on DPReview) taken at f8 of textured surfaces. I didn’t add the shots here due to the 500k limit. I posted them there, and on my Flickr album.

https://www.flickr.com/gp/romeobravophoto/2gW14b

To my eye (on my 42”4K monitor) the Summilux TL on the Leica CL is superior. I’m truly impressed by this combo.

It’s making me think I might sell my Zony 55/1.8.

Don't know whether it's permitted to reference another site, and apologies in advance if it's not, but this is a most interesting comparison between the two cameras:

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4296018

same author as this thread

Edited by RomeoBravo
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, for one there is a significant different tone in the pictures.

 

The CL + 35/1.4 is about the same price as the Sony A7RM3 + 55/1.8. If you like the Leica pictures better, then there isn't anything else to say. 

 

Technically, I don't think they are... but what does that matter anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...