Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Mine just came in the mail today. Made in Canada version. I like it so far. Still need to shoot a bit more with it. Do wish it had a focusing tab on it though.

Just get yourself a Lenstab - I think i have the smallest version on mine.

my lens is a bit stiff, but the tab really helps to focus it quickly.

 

 

I love my 90 T-E (1976 canada version)

It does flare quite badly when shot into the light, so keep a hood on it (not the genuine leica one, but a cheap eBay screw in one) 

it can have some nice effects when the flare is used carefully (with live view)

I think it may be due to a bit of internal haze - I will eventually send it for a CLA and my 90 M Rokkor (the complete opposite - flare resistant and very contrasty) in to be repaired.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

This cat is a frequent visitor to our yard - theres a little PS/LR done here, but nothing that would break the ethics rules at the newspaper where i used to work - the eyes are really that blue.

Edited by Echo63
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just get yourself a Lenstab - I think i have the smallest version on mine.

my lens is a bit stiff, but the tab really helps to focus it quickly.

 

 

I love my 90 T-E (1976 canada version)

It does flare quite badly when shot into the light, so keep a hood on it (not the genuine leica one, but a cheap eBay screw in one) 

it can have some nice effects when the flare is used carefully (with live view)

I think it may be due to a bit of internal haze - I will eventually send it for a CLA and my 90 M Rokkor (the complete opposite - flare resistant and very contrasty) in to be repaired.

attachicon.gifBEN36977.jpg

 

This cat is a frequent visitor to our yard - theres a little PS/LR done here, but nothing that would break the ethics rules at the newspaper where i used to work - the eyes are really that blue.

attachicon.gifBEN44688.jpg

 

 

Thanks. I'm gonna look into a lenstab. 

 

Mine is a 1981 Canada-made version. Haven't done much shooting with it yet. I'm also looking into a hood. The Leica ones are stupid expensive. Gotta keep an eye out for a cheaper one.

 

Love that photo of the cat. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just tested my 90 TE out..and even though it has slight haze and a little oil on the blades..I had a hard time getting it to flare..in other words..not any more flare prone than any other lens I have..and actually much less than some...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just tested my 90 TE out..and even though it has slight haze and a little oil on the blades..I had a hard time getting it to flare..in other words..not any more flare prone than any other lens I have..and actually much less than some...

 

Just put a high light source as the sun or a halogen lamp into the frame or just outside the frame and you will see a lot of flare unless you use a large hood plus your hand or a hat to make some more shade eventually. 

Edited by lct
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just shot these..90mm TE..

#1 in aft sun streaming in thru the left...

eEvmide.jpg

#2 Halogen lamp...would flare very slightly when out of range near the corner of frame..but no more than a thousand other lenses would..

Really had a hard time getting this one to flare..even had dust on front element..as hasn't been used or cleaned in years..

fTyXkE5.jpg

Edited by tsleica
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

According to the serial number lists in the Leica-wiki my ELW copy (3452***) is from the last production year 1987. If tsleica bought his new in 88 (post #4) then it’s most likely from the same run?

I’ll try to take a few frames tomorrow sans hood - from memory they’ll be similarly flare-less...... and try to have a closer look at the interior baffles etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Nowhereman

In my experience flare as strong as in the picture in post #41 comes from extensive haze in the lens. Before I had it cleaned, my DR Summicron-50 flared so badly that it could not be shot into the light: after having it cleaned it has no problem. Virtually the same thing happened with my Summilux 50 pre-ASPH. I haven't had any flare issues with my Tele-Elmarit 90.

 

I don't have any skill in examining a lens for hazing...

 

_______________

Alone in Bangkok essay on BURN Magazine

Instagram: @mitchalland

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree that pattern of flare looked like haze on the elements.

 

In my experience flare as strong as in the picture in post #41 comes from extensive haze in the lens. Before I had it cleaned, my DR Summicron-50 flared so badly that it could not be shot into the light: after having it cleaned it has no problem. Virtually the same thing happened with my Summilux 50 pre-ASPH. I haven't had any flare issues with my Tele-Elmarit 90.

 

I don't have any skill in examining a lens for hazing...

 

_______________

Alone in Bangkok essay on BURN Magazine

Instagram: @mitchalland

Link to post
Share on other sites

So rare a version...made in an extremely limited amounts..the rare Canadian 90mm TE..that does not flare..lol..

 

I am glad for you but i would not render a service to possible users in letting them believe that the Tele-Elmarit "thin" 90/2.8 is flare free, at least the Canadian version. I have no experience with the German version though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am glad for you but i would not render a service to possible users in letting them believe that the Tele-Elmarit "thin" 90/2.8 is flare free, at least the Canadian version.

 

Go Canada...! At least for the for the impossible to find..non-flare ver2.015.. :D

 If tsleica bought his new in 88 (post #4) then it’s most likely from the same run?

 

Mine is #306*151...don't know what year that was made..

Link to post
Share on other sites

no flare on mine when shot directly into a light source. German lens

 

Just found a German version as well so i will check this little miracle by myself if any. Don't ask me if i hold my breath though... Not that i challenge your good faith neither that of tsleica of course but i have never seen a flare free lens in 30+ years of photography and my flare tests are not gentle at all. B)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two kinds of photographer - those who have gotten flare from a 90TE, and those who will. ;)

 

Pretty simple little example from my "acid-test for flare machine" - my dining room chandelier. As I posted way back on page 1, demonstrating the cause/source (internal barrel reflections), what really counts is bright light just outside the picture area - NOT necessarily a bright light IN the picture. And not a haze problem (this lens is very clear otherwise) - the dark unflared strip across the top of the 90mm picture is signature for internal reflections off camera/lens structure, not glass reflections or haze.

 

Overall scene (w/ 35mm), then 90 TE (Can. 320xxxx, 1982), then 75 Summarit f/2.4 ........ (BTW 306xxxx is a 1980 lens)

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

Just for the record, I have used/owned about 6-7 different copies of the 90 TE "thin" over the past 17 years - they all did this in this (or similar) situations. It is a particular (but not all that uncommon) situation - and if you haven't tried it, you haven't tried it.

 

OTOH, with care taken to watch the lighting, they perform just fine - one was a part of my kit when my second-place finish beat out TIME magazine (and Nat Geo's third-place effort) in this little contest (see spreads 2, 34 and 37 for 90TE shots): http://www.poyi.org/69/34/index.php

 

The lens is good enough and small enough that I work around this little quirk.

Edited by adan
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did some pixel peeping and realized that I could not keep the camera steady enough at shutter speeds less than 1/125 with this lens.

 

I am coming to Leica from the Canon system (1dxmkii and 5dsr and EF stabilized lenses) and could take Canon exposures down to 1/4 second without any blur.

 

I thought that there was something wrong with the camera or lens until I took the attached with a tripod...iso 200 at 4 seconds 

 

 

Curiously, my Canadian version kept stopping for Molson

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by richardlipow
Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree this test (light source outside the image area) is likely caused by internal reflections in the lens barrel. I was previously referring to the image shot with the light source in the image and significant “ghosting” flare around the light source.

 

BTW the V5 Summicron 50 is also highly susceptible to flare from sources outside the image area. One of its least desirable characteristic to me.

 

There are two kinds of photographer - those who have gotten flare from a 90TE, and those who will. ;)

 

Pretty simple little example from my "acid-test for flare machine" - my dining room chandelier. As I posted way back on page 1, demonstrating the cause/source (internal barrel reflections), what really counts is bright light just outside the picture area - NOT necessarily a bright light IN the picture. And not a haze problem (this lens is very clear otherwise) - the dark unflared strip across the top of the 90mm picture is signature for internal reflections off camera/lens structure, not glass reflections or haze.

 

Overall scene (w/ 35mm), then 90 TE (Can. 320xxxx, 1982), then 75 Summarit f/2.4 ........ (BTW 306xxxx is a 1980 lens)

 

teflarescene.jpg

 

TEflare90.jpg

 

TEflare75.jpg

 

Just for the record, I have used/owned about 6-7 different copies of the 90 TE "thin" over the past 17 years - they all did this in this (or similar) situations. It is a particular (but not all that uncommon) situation - and if you haven't tried it, you haven't tried it.

 

OTOH, with care taken to watch the lighting, they perform just fine - one was a part of my kit when my second-place finish beat out TIME magazine (and Nat Geo's third-place effort) in this little contest (see spreads 2, 34 and 37 for 90TE shots): http://www.poyi.org/69/34/index.php

 

The lens is good enough and small enough that I work around this little quirk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...