LocalHero1953 Posted April 5, 2018 Share #521 Posted April 5, 2018 Advertisement (gone after registration) Mind the razor wire London M240+Thambar ~f/4, no filter Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 4 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/279589-thambar-crazy/?do=findComment&comment=3494780'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 5, 2018 Posted April 5, 2018 Hi LocalHero1953, Take a look here Thambar-Crazy. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
LocalHero1953 Posted April 5, 2018 Share #522 Posted April 5, 2018 The boys have arrived Shoreditch High Street station, London M240+Thambar, ~f/2.4, no filter I admit to having processed this a bit to balance the exposures, but I have not affected the essential Thambarness. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 11 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/279589-thambar-crazy/?do=findComment&comment=3494787'>More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted April 5, 2018 Share #523 Posted April 5, 2018 As the previous posts imply, I have got my Thambar back after focus adjustment in Wetzlar. Seems to be OK, though its sometimes tricky to tell what the Thambar's point of focus is when shooting wide open . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianman Posted April 5, 2018 Share #524 Posted April 5, 2018 (edited) So I was at Red Dot Cameras yesterday to pick up my new black paint MP and left with... well guess... Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! My better half was with me, I took a few test shots with both a 1935 version and the new one... and to be honest although the markings on the new one were obviously much more visible making slightly easier to use, I preferred the rendering of the old one. So I got it... after Natalie saw the photos and said "just buy it!"... and who am I to disobey a direct order! Edit: M9, 1935 Thambar Edited April 5, 2018 by ianman 13 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! My better half was with me, I took a few test shots with both a 1935 version and the new one... and to be honest although the markings on the new one were obviously much more visible making slightly easier to use, I preferred the rendering of the old one. So I got it... after Natalie saw the photos and said "just buy it!"... and who am I to disobey a direct order! Edit: M9, 1935 Thambar ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/279589-thambar-crazy/?do=findComment&comment=3494869'>More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted April 5, 2018 Share #525 Posted April 5, 2018 They mentioned today that someone had just bought an old one! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
derleicaman Posted April 5, 2018 Share #526 Posted April 5, 2018 So I was at Red Dot Cameras yesterday to pick up my new black paint MP and left with... well guess... L1001060_ird_lcf_001.jpg My better half was with me, I took a few test shots with both a 1935 version and the new one... and to be honest although the markings on the new one were obviously much more visible making slightly easier to use, I preferred the rendering of the old one. So I got it... after Natalie saw the photos and said "just buy it!"... and who am I to disobey a direct order! Edit: M9, 1935 Thambar Beautiful portrait! Very nice for an impromptu shot. I hate to say grab shot. There is something about the Thambar that just works better in B&W. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianman Posted April 5, 2018 Share #527 Posted April 5, 2018 Advertisement (gone after registration) Here are a couple more... I haven't a lot of time to "play" with it at the moment. M9, Thambar (1935 version) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 10 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/279589-thambar-crazy/?do=findComment&comment=3494900'>More sharing options...
farnz Posted April 6, 2018 Share #528 Posted April 6, 2018 They're all appealing but I particularly like the last picture of ianwoman. Pete. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
derleicaman Posted April 6, 2018 Share #529 Posted April 6, 2018 (edited) Ianman, these images reinforce my belief that the Thambar does better in B&W. Especially your most recent third example. As you shot with the M9, perhaps you could post the originals in color? My little experiments earlier in this thread with my grandson and the Menorah candles are another example where the B&W images are better than the same in color. I would also recommend Milan's B&W images. I would not want to make this an iron rule by any means, but the color images are more distracting to me. Edited April 6, 2018 by derleicaman 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianman Posted April 6, 2018 Share #530 Posted April 6, 2018 (edited) Here is the last one in colour, converted in Iridient with no pp at all. The light was very harsh. At Red Dot, they kindly installed the latest firmware but the Thambar doesn't appear in the lens list, is anyone else here using an old one on digital? Maybe I can code my adapter as there is little chance it would ever be used with another lens... then again, it may make no difference whatsoever. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited April 6, 2018 by ianman 6 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/279589-thambar-crazy/?do=findComment&comment=3495043'>More sharing options...
Wonzo Posted April 6, 2018 Share #531 Posted April 6, 2018 Thambar at f/2.4 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 5 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/279589-thambar-crazy/?do=findComment&comment=3495047'>More sharing options...
farnz Posted April 6, 2018 Share #532 Posted April 6, 2018 Here is the last one in colour, converted in Iridient with no pp at all. The light was very harsh. At Red Dot, they kindly installed the latest firmware but the Thambar doesn't appear in the lens list, is anyone else here using an old one on digital? Maybe I can code my adapter as there is little chance it would ever be used with another lens... then again, it may make no difference whatsoever. Ian, You don't need to worry about coding your adapter (or choosing your Thambar from a list if was there) unless you particularly wish the EXIF name the Thambar. Coding is designed to correct vignetting in wide angle lenses caused by the off-set micro-lenses on the Kodak KAF 18500 digital sensor so there would be no correction applied to the Thambar's pictures. Pete. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted April 6, 2018 Share #533 Posted April 6, 2018 (edited) Ianman, these images reinforce my belief that the Thambar does better in B&W. Especially your most recent third example. As you shot with the M9, perhaps you could post the originals in color? My little experiments earlier in this thread with my grandson and the Menorah candles are another example where the B&W images are better than the same in color. I would also recommend Milan's B&W images. I would not want to make this an iron rule by any means, but the color images are more distracting to me. It will be interesting to see how this develops as more Thambars get into the wild. My own view (as expressed before) is that colour is just one other element in composition, whether it's a Thambar or another lens, and not many of us are that good at handling an extra element. And since some of the best pictorial images have simple compositions, removing colour has a beneficial effect. The only aspect about the Thambar that might make B&W more beneficial is that it is extremely easy for distracting colourful highlights and detail to be made more prominent (too prominent); then, removing colour is one way of removing that distraction. If colour is used as a conscious element in composition, though, I don't believe there is anything about the Thambar that would stop the image working. I suppose what I'm saying is: it is our limitations as photographers that make it easier to get good images with the Thambar in B&W - it's not a limitation of the lens itself. Edited April 6, 2018 by LocalHero1953 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted April 6, 2018 Share #534 Posted April 6, 2018 At Red Dot, they kindly installed the latest firmware but the Thambar doesn't appear in the lens list, is anyone else here using an old one on digital? Maybe I can code my adapter as there is little chance it would ever be used with another lens... then again, it may make no difference whatsoever. I don't think it will ever appear in the manual list because the Thambar-M, like other post-2008 lenses, has only ever been sold with a 6-bit code. Coding the adaptor sounds like the best course of action if you want the lens identified in EXIF. It sounds like you don't use Adobe Camera RAW but, if you do, it is worth noting that a lens profile for the Thambar is now available. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted April 6, 2018 Share #535 Posted April 6, 2018 (edited) Here is the last one in colour, converted in Iridient with no pp at all. The light was very harsh. Contrary to the opinion expressed elsewhere I think I prefer the colour version to the previously posted black and white version. Of your recent set, I think I like this one the most. I prefer the lower contrast and the lack of light/shadow drama. Edited April 6, 2018 by wattsy 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milan_S Posted April 6, 2018 Share #536 Posted April 6, 2018 Mr. Lucky Martini Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 9 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/279589-thambar-crazy/?do=findComment&comment=3495064'>More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted April 6, 2018 Share #537 Posted April 6, 2018 This was Monet with a Thambar. Would it work better in B&W? Painters, of course, can pick and choose their colours and compositions. Photographers just have to deal with what's in front of them. B&W photography is just a historical accident that demonstrates the limitations of primitive technology and our limitations as artists. Now, where's my steel helmet? 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted April 6, 2018 Share #538 Posted April 6, 2018 This was Monet with a Thambar. Would it work better in B&W? The Monet makes the point well (as does the fine Renoir "Gust of Wind" landscape that hangs a few feet away). Can't say I agree with your more general point that B&W "demonstrates the limitations of primitive technology and our limitations as artists". 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter H Posted April 6, 2018 Share #539 Posted April 6, 2018 I often feel uncomfortable when comparing lens effects with paintings. There are so many differences between the two media that any similarities are likely at best to be coincidental and at worst pastiche. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted April 6, 2018 Share #540 Posted April 6, 2018 Mr. Lucky Martini I like these Hollywood inspired portraits Milan_S has made. Is anyone here using the Thambar with film? If so, I would be very interested in their thoughts and examples. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now