dancook Posted March 2, 2017 Share #201 Posted March 2, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) This is what happens when i'm stuck to my desk.. shot at 1.4... oooo ahhh.. nothing to see here https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/621/33164981326_e271143000_o.jpg L1240102 by dancook1982, on Flickr Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 2, 2017 Posted March 2, 2017 Hi dancook, Take a look here Please convince me the SL 50/1.4 is better than summilux. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
dancook Posted March 3, 2017 Share #202 Posted March 3, 2017 Had the shutter speed a bit low at 1/50th and got a micro amount of camera shake.. and my wife is writing an essay now, so not going to keep bothering her Lou @ 50mm SL by dancook1982, on Flickr Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaemono Posted March 3, 2017 Share #203 Posted March 3, 2017 Had the shutter speed a bit low at 1/50th and got a micro amount of camera shake.. and my wife is writing an essay now, so not going to keep bothering her Lou @ 50mm SL by dancook1982, on Flickr This lens is addictive and you have a beautiful model to work with. You’ll keep them coming. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacksinner Posted March 3, 2017 Share #204 Posted March 3, 2017 Had the shutter speed a bit low at 1/50th and got a micro amount of camera shake.. and my wife is writing an essay now, so not going to keep bothering her Lou @ 50mm SL by dancook1982, on Flickr Very nice. please upload the full resolution if you don't mind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dancook Posted March 3, 2017 Share #205 Posted March 3, 2017 Very nice. please upload the full resolution if you don't mind i think there's a tiny bit of movement in the image, as there were sharper less good photos taken in a short series. https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2906/32379437324_20fb63f7e1_o.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom0511 Posted March 3, 2017 Share #206 Posted March 3, 2017 at f2.0 I like the Skin Color from that combo and als find the images sharp but at the same time smooth (I know that doesnt sound logic) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/267776-please-convince-me-the-sl-5014-is-better-than-summilux/?do=findComment&comment=3226046'>More sharing options...
thighslapper Posted March 3, 2017 Share #207 Posted March 3, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) very nice (dan & tom) ...... and convinces me it is the OOF rendering that makes this lens worth persisting with .... the effect really lets the focal point of images shine .... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom0511 Posted March 3, 2017 Share #208 Posted March 3, 2017 another (dont know why I shot it at f1.4 but find the details very good for an f1.4 shot.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom0511 Posted March 3, 2017 Share #209 Posted March 3, 2017 another (dont know why I shot it at f1.4 but find the details very good for an f1.4 shot.) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/267776-please-convince-me-the-sl-5014-is-better-than-summilux/?do=findComment&comment=3226129'>More sharing options...
tom0511 Posted March 3, 2017 Share #210 Posted March 3, 2017 just see that for some reason the posted image appears much more "fuzzy" than the original file. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ropo54 Posted March 3, 2017 Share #211 Posted March 3, 2017 at f2.0 I like the Skin Color from that combo and als find the images sharp but at the same time smooth (I know that doesnt sound logic) I think your images look much like portrait shots coming from the 24-90. (Perhaps, no surprise there?) This one: 77mm f/3.8 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/267776-please-convince-me-the-sl-5014-is-better-than-summilux/?do=findComment&comment=3226137'>More sharing options...
Chaemono Posted March 3, 2017 Share #212 Posted March 3, 2017 I think your images look much like portrait shots coming from the 24-90. (Perhaps, no surprise there?) This one: 77mm f/3.8 The compression here absolutely murders the images. It does so for yours and Tom's. I can't tell much of a difference but Tom's look slightly better IMO, maybe because they are more crisp to begin with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom0511 Posted March 3, 2017 Share #213 Posted March 3, 2017 The compression here absolutely murders the images. It does so for yours and Tom's. I can't tell much of a difference but Tom's look slightly better IMO, maybe because they are more crisp to begin with. With compression do you mean framing too tight or DOF too shallow (or both) or something else? They were not meant as great examples for portraits but just some snaps to check out the lens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrp Posted March 3, 2017 Share #214 Posted March 3, 2017 He means the image data compression. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom0511 Posted March 3, 2017 Share #215 Posted March 3, 2017 He means the image data compression. Ah, thanks, I thought compressed field of view. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRJohn Posted March 5, 2017 Share #216 Posted March 5, 2017 Resale on SL lenses is, at best, speculative. As an N=1: I bought my SL 24-90 used (6 months old) at -30% in excellent condition; which is a similar discount (-20-30%) one can achieve with purchasing used M lenses out of current production Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ferdinand Posted March 5, 2017 Share #217 Posted March 5, 2017 another (dont know why I shot it at f1.4 but find the details very good for an f1.4 shot.) Fürstenlager? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caissa Posted March 7, 2017 Share #218 Posted March 7, 2017 There are some discussions abut the speed of AF with this lens. So I place my question here, no better place currently. In the AF settings it is possible to specify the number of AF steps (1, 5, 37, 49 etc.) are possible. Has somebody already played around with these values ? What is their influence on the AF results/precision and on the AF speed ? Would they for example (positively) influence the AF speed of the SL 50 lens ? I do not really understand what these values are meant for - can anybody give an explanation ? Thanks. And another item not really clear: Since firmware 2.0 the number of single-point AF points has been increased to 529 AF-points (only in single-point AF mode) How can I make use of this ? Is the manual selection now somehow "finer" ? Or is this a feature just used by the automatic AF function (like tracking AF, or face detect AF, but this is probably not single-point but multi-point) ? Sorry, in case this has been answered before. There seems to be more confusion about this. Even in the DPR SL test they specified 49 AF-points instead of the 529. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phovsho Posted March 8, 2017 Share #219 Posted March 8, 2017 Can I ask another question... is af speed a function of aperture ie does the camera have hunt longer or more precisely for the correct focus point when the depth of field is very narrow? Or is af spend independent of the selected aperture ? Thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD_50 Posted March 8, 2017 Share #220 Posted March 8, 2017 AF speed is going to be dependent on the ability for the camera to detect contrast. Lighting, DOF, subject matter all make a difference. You'll likely notice errors much more easily at large aperture since the camera has less room for error. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.