Nordvik Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2261 Posted January 18, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) I like it, and I want one. Using M9 and M8 now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 18, 2017 Posted January 18, 2017 Hi Nordvik, Take a look here Leica M 10. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Paul J Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2262 Posted January 18, 2017 Are you Jonathan Pie by any chance? Have you never had a deep sense of passion about what you do? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmahto Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2263 Posted January 18, 2017 Anyone know if anything's be done about the dreaded noise reduction countdown? Read somewhere. Same old. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdwardM Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2264 Posted January 18, 2017 I am not sure I understand the comments on the "death of M". Can't you still buy a new flim M from Leica. What if M10 is the last digital M? What do M lovers fear? I am talking about digital M. If four years of development brought us only slightly better OVF and 2 stops difference with M240, accomplished with ISO dial, than M is not priority for Leica. For me its clear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmahto Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2265 Posted January 18, 2017 From Jono's review... There is no aperture info in the exif data. Don't know why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianman Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2266 Posted January 18, 2017 blah blah blah... blah blah blah... ... But M10 states clearly the dusk of the rangefinder technology. Why ? What "revolution" were you expecting ? The wheel has had no major revolutionary upgrades for quite a while, but it's still used every day. To me, a very happy M9 user, the M10 look is very tempting and I will certainly be taking a good look & test of one in the near future. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmahto Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2267 Posted January 18, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) I am talking about digital M. If four years of development brought us only slightly better OVF and 2 stops difference with M240, accomplished with ISO dial, than M is not priority for Leica. For me its clear. How does it affect you? If M10 is suitable for your purpose and if they keep manufacturing it (means repairs are possible), then why do you care? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2268 Posted January 18, 2017 Have you never had a deep sense of passion about what you do? Not in a way that leads me to express it as you do. But that doesn't offend me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UliWer Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2269 Posted January 18, 2017 I am not sure I understand the comments on the "death of M". Can't you still buy a new flim M from Leica. What if M10 is the last digital M? What do M lovers fear? Some may fear that it just stays an M and doesn't become an M-SL-A7-XT-1-HD1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdwardM Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2270 Posted January 18, 2017 Why ? What "revolution" were you expecting ? The wheel has had no major revolutionary upgrades for quite a while, but it's still used every day. To me, a very happy M9 user, the M10 look is very tempting and I will certainly be taking a good look & test of one in the near future. From M9 it will be great step - its 8 years difference. I don't get blah blah blah. I have my opinion - you have yours. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianman Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2271 Posted January 18, 2017 Some may fear that it just stays an M and doesn't become an M-SL-A7-XT-1-HD1. ok, so does that one exist in black paint ? sorry I'll stop now !! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdwardM Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2272 Posted January 18, 2017 How does it affect you? If M10 is suitable for your purpose and if they keep manufacturing it (means repairs are possible), then why do you care? Its affects me directly as M lens owner at least. I don't want to switch on SL or any other camera. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmahto Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2273 Posted January 18, 2017 Its affects me directly as M lens owner at least. I don't want to switch on SL or any other camera. Why do you have to switch? Why can't you keep using your M10, 10 years from now (with Leica servicing it)? I still use my Canon 40D bought in 2007 and it produces gorgeous 10mega pixel pictures. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UliWer Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2274 Posted January 18, 2017 From Jono's review... There is no aperture info in the exif data. Don't know why? I don't know why they ever added it. It could never be exact, since there is no link between the aperture in a lens for an M and the camera's electronic. What you read in the exif was just guessing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianman Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2275 Posted January 18, 2017 January 18th 2017, the day all digital Leicas previous to the M10 stopped working. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2276 Posted January 18, 2017 What can USB tethering do (for manual M) that WiFi tethering can't? I am seriously asking since I never used tethering, USB control is immediate. Very many of us who have used WiFi are disappointed with delay. . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmahto Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2277 Posted January 18, 2017 I don't know why they ever added it. It could never be exact, since there is no link between the aperture in a lens for an M and the camera's electronic. What you read in the exif was just guessing. Yes, it was not exact, however in normal light conditions it was close. I found it useful while shooting test pictures. I still tagged test pictures with exact aperture used but it was easier to do that by looking at the approximate exif info. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
d0c0m0 Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2278 Posted January 18, 2017 I am a happy M9-P user. Yes, CCD. I am also happy with my no LCD screen MD ... CMOS. I guess I can wait for the all black/no logo M10-P Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted January 19, 2017 Share #2279 Posted January 19, 2017 From Jono's review... There is no aperture info in the exif data. Don't know why? As the guesstimated f-stop has always been approximate anyway, Leica thinks it should not be stored as standard Exif data – like the M (Typ 240) did, but apparently that wasn’t intentional – but only as part of the proprietary Maker Notes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bybrett Posted January 19, 2017 Share #2280 Posted January 19, 2017 But with deepest sad i see that its the Dead End of M system in nearest future. M10 most probably the last M camera Leica developed to support current owners of M manual focus lenses. We will see M10 version 2, 3 etc. but its the end anyway. M system is unbeatable experience for art photography and I enjoy rangefinder focusing more than any other system camera. But M10 states clearly the dusk of the rangefinder technology. Thats my personal conclusion, quite pity, but evident for me. Ed You conclude M10 is the dead end of the M system By the same token it could be considered the pinnacle But Leica states it to be a milestone which would indicate a longer road Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.