Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 hours ago, helged said:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1007984412867297281: Peter Karbe showing sneak peak of upcoming 35mm APO-Summicron-SL. “Performance touches the roof! Optical quality like this hasn’t been seen before on a 35mm. No distortion whatsoever.”

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Lens is up out on Leica's site.

Edited by Agent M10
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.  Also on en.leica-camera.com .  I don't yet see the technical specs with those awesome MTF's.  The embargo must have ended at 9 am NY time, or something like that.

There are multiple versions of some details.  The text on the website talks about having 1 aspherical element (out of 13 in 11 groups).  The drawing shows 3.  I've seen another memo that has 5 aspherical elements.  Two separately moving elements for autofocus.  Minimum focus distance either 0.3 m or 0.27.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, scott kirkpatrick said:

Yes.  Also on en.leica-camera.com .  I don't yet see the technical specs with those awesome MTF's.  The embargo must have ended at 9 am NY time, or something like that.

There are multiple versions of some details.  The text on the website talks about having 1 aspherical element (out of 13 in 11 groups).  The drawing shows 3.  I've seen another memo that has 5 aspherical elements.  Two separately moving elements for autofocus.  Minimum focus distance either 0.3 m or 0.27.

A little down on this page, the optics is described; it appears like there are (at least) two different types of aspherical elements used, possibly explaining the different numbers of Asph elements: http://en.leica-camera.com/Photography/Leica-SL/SL-Lenses/Prime-Lenses/APO-Summicron-SL-35. No official mtf yet. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the puzzling statement of one element -- one of which is an aspherical lens for the correction of monochromatic aberration

but that could mean that one of them is for spherical aberration and the other two are part of making the purple fringes go away forever (as in the interview that Thorsten Overgaard wrote up).

I see that Leica is listing three filters, including a ND for the folks who like their seawater smooth and foamy.  Since these Summicrons now come in a standard size, that may not be a new thing.

Edited by scott kirkpatrick
Link to post
Share on other sites

"The apochromatic optical design uses anomalous partial dispersion glass to suppress color fringing and chromatic aberrations for high clarity and color accuracy, and five aspherical elements are also featured to reduce spherical aberrations for improved sharpness." 

Holy Moly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, grahamhoey said:

Pricing on B and H is USD 4,595. According to both them and Leica Miami coming in about 4 weeks.

Popflash is also taking preorders at that price. 

Arbitrage check:  $4595 = 4036 EUR = 3464 GBP.   To compare with the, say, EUR price (4400 EUR including VAT)  you need to subtract VAT and add 100 EUR or more for shipping to the US.  That is 3700-3800 EUR, which is still a bargain if you can find one or get one while travelling and save the shipping (US doesn't have customs duties on still cameras, as yet).

Edited by scott kirkpatrick
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The thought that the 35 Summicron is diffraction limited, or near as not, is truly impressive.  I’m more of a 75mm fan, but having the 50 Summilux-SL  would make that addition rather pointless ..

I’ll wait for a nice fast medium telephoto prime, I think. APO-Elmarit-SL 180/2.8 ASPH will do nicely.  With image stabilisation, if that’s okay.  I want something reasonably compact (not a ridiculous Summicron 180 - the R version was beyond hand holding).  No, I had a Nikon 180/2.8 once, and it was lovely.  An SL version would be just fine.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, IkarusJohn said:

The thought that the 35 Summicron is diffraction limited, or near as not, is truly impressive.  I’m more of a 75mm fan, but having the 50 Summilux-SL  would make that addition rather pointless ..

I’ll wait for a nice fast medium telephoto prime, I think. APO-Elmarit-SL 180/2.8 ASPH will do nicely.  With image stabilisation, if that’s okay.  I want something reasonably compact (not a ridiculous Summicron 180 - the R version was beyond hand holding).  No, I had a Nikon 180/2.8 once, and it was lovely.  An SL version would be just fine.

The S to L adapter and 70mm/180mm S lenses are available, readily available on the used market.  The only caveat is the motor issue.   Is the 180mm lens on the roadmap for the SL, I'd be surprised to see IS in any interchangeable prime lens from Leica, it goes against their lens philosophy.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, darylgo said:

The S to L adapter and 70mm/180mm S lenses are available, readily available on the used market.  The only caveat is the motor issue.   Is the 180mm lens on the roadmap for the SL, I'd be surprised to see IS in any interchangeable prime lens from Leica, it goes against their lens philosophy.  

Using medium format lens on full frame could be half way towards the weight of APO Summicron R 180mm plus unwanted adaptor.

APO Elmarit R 180mm is one relatively compact lens for the given FL and weight is just below 1kg.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mmradman said:

Using medium format lens on full frame could be half way towards the weight of APO Summicron R 180mm plus unwanted adaptor.

APO Elmarit R 180mm is one relatively compact lens for the given FL and weight is just below 1kg.

Advantages each way, AF on 180 S and it is more accurate on the SL than the S.  I don't believe Leica has made a poor 180mm, my older non apo R Elmarit with scratched (sadly) front element has IQ that far exceeds it's reputation and price.  Either way adapters are necessary, the Leica's being the best I've used from a integration standpoint and yet a pain in the derriere at times. 

Edited by darylgo
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, darylgo said:

Advantages each way, AF on 180 S and it is more accurate on the SL than the S.  I don't believe Leica has made a poor 180mm, my older non apo R Elmarit with scratched (sadly) front element has IQ that far exceeds it's reputation and price.  Either way adapters are necessary, the Leica's being the best I've used from a integration standpoint and yet a pain in the derriere at times. 

I just checked S 180mm is f3.5, for the kind of money you can get at least three Panasonic 70-200 f4, it would be more sensible choice if AF is prerequisite.

I don’t mind splashing out but not on behemoths.

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, mmradman said:

I just checked S 180mm is f3.5, for the kind of money you can get at least three Panasonic 70-200 f4, it would be more sensible choice if AF is prerequisite.

I don’t mind splashing out but not on behemoths.

Sure, you make a good point but the subject is 180mm, both you and I don't know what IkarusJohn requires, currently the 180S is the only 180mm Leica lens that can be used with AF on the SL.  

Edited by darylgo
Link to post
Share on other sites

I did have the ROM version of the APO Elmarit-R 180/2.8 some time ago, and very good it was too. 

The 90-280 zoom is very good, but ... large. My point is more that Leica is duplicating ocal lengths with the M system - I already have excellent primes in 21-28-50-75 focal lengths, so I don’t really need a further SL lens in those focal lengths. For walk about or a trip, the toss up for me is M or SL. If it’s a single lens, I’ll take the 24-90; two lenses, the 16-35 & 50.  The big zoom stays at home, save for birding, sports and the like.

 I’d like to see some good primes 135 and longer. For some reason I can explain, 8 think in traditional terms of 90-135-180.  Getting out to 210, 280, 400, 560, the lenses are too big and it”s not the sort of photography I do.  I backpacked around the world in my youth for a few years with a mid-rnage prime (28-85?j and a 180/2.8 tele.  It was a perfect combination for me.  I’d love to see such a lens of the quality of the 35 Summicron-SL in that focal length.

PS- not interested in going back to R lenses with adapters and certainly no interest in adapting S lenses.

Edited by IkarusJohn
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...