Jump to content

24 Elmarit f/2.8


jdlaing

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

But why on earth does it matter?

None of these framelines apply to this lens.

Either estimate going to the very edges of the internal OVF or fit an external OVF and do it properly.

Because I'm going to get a six bit replacement flange for it and I wanted to know which flange I needed ... That's why. I already know about using the edge of the viewfinder and the OVF or EVF.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica leapfrogs the framelines brought up by the superwides, so that they don't pair with the next closest lens (whether it normally has a frameline or not). Except, of course, the 50-75 pairing, which was forced on Leica by historical contingency.

 

(Internal framelines in bold)

 

21,28,90

18,24,35,135

 

Because, of course, the M8 DID add lines for a 24 - and at one point there was thought given to a "wide-finder" camera with internal framelines 21-50 (21/28, 24/35, 50), which instead became the .58x.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I'm considering the 24. On,framelines why would this pull any framlines? Can the coding be modified for that? Meaning,24m firmware IQ but no framelines.

 

Wouldn't this be most accurate

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll get some framelines anyway ... even if you change the mount with an uncoded one, or file the bayonet's lug that actuates the framelines and paint all white the bits, you'll end up with the 50/75 pair (and then of course, you can activate firmware correction for 24, setting lens recognition "manual" and selecting 24) : not a smart work to do, you destruct lens'originality and gain nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...