Jump to content

New M product line at Photokina 2015


MaDeVa

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

They DID promise an R10 at the S2 introduction.  Promises are worth the electrons they're written with.  "not be made by Leica" doesn't mean much, the T lenses aren't made by Leica.

These were not electrons - they were physical words in a session with a couple of hundred forum members, it is documented in the forum (unless the thread got lost in the transition) Who promised at the S2 introduction and how? Real interest.

Not that an R resurrection would make sense nowadays. There are plenty of alternatives, tooling of the lenses is no longer there, far to costly to enter a declining market, 135 class SLRs are on the way to become dinosaurs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

These were not electrons - they were physical words in a session with a couple of hundred forum members, it is documented in the forum (unless the thread got lost in the transition) Who promised at the S2 introduction and how? Real interest.

Not that an R resurrection would make sense nowadays. There are plenty of alternatives, tooling of the lenses is no longer there, far to costly to enter a declining market, 135 class SLRs are on the way to become dinosaurs. 

 

Can you point to anything I've written in the last 5 years that would indicate I'm advocating an R resurrection?

 

None of the alternatives for using R lenses, among the best ever made, include operating the automatic aperture, a feature introduced more than half a century ago.  Not a complex feature, and one that is very useful for focussing quickly and accurately.  A smart adapter for an existing camera (i.e., T, E-mount, Fujifilm) is not rocket science.

 

Leica has shown it can make smart adapters.  This IMHO would constitute fulfilling its promise to R lens users.  Until this happens Leica's promises are empty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

Anyone using the Sony a7ii as a backup to the M...... Something small with AF and on a full frame Sony/Leica sensor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Autofocus is sacrilege.

 

Only if you are an old fart...............us young un's love it :)

 

Really it's not an age thing...... :rolleyes:    hark!....I think I hear the beat of a different drum...... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone using the Sony a7ii as a backup to the M...... Something small with AF and on a full frame Sony/Leica sensor?

 

The way things are going over in a7 land (i.e. great) Leica might want to consider making lenses with the FE mount  ;) . Its an expanding system and, well, puts a lot of pressure on the M Lineup ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone using the Sony a7ii as a backup to the M...... Something small with AF and on a full frame Sony/Leica sensor?

If you use it as a backup your are going to put your Leica lenses on it, if need be. What does AF matter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way things are going over in a7 land (i.e. great) Leica might want to consider making lenses with the FE mount  ;) . Its an expanding system and, well, puts a lot of pressure on the M Lineup ...

Maybe on the initial purchase of camera bodies (although I doubt it, if used as a second camera), but it sells lenses, and after they buy a lens they move on to an M camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

If you use it as a backup your are going to put your Leica lenses on it, if need be. What does AF matter?

I don't think so mate..................Sony make some fantastic af lenses

Link to post
Share on other sites

None of the alternatives for using R lenses, among the best ever made, include operating the automatic aperture, a feature introduced more than half a century ago.  Not a complex feature, and one that is very useful for focussing quickly and accurately.  A smart adapter for an existing camera (i.e., T, E-mount, Fujifilm) is not rocket science.

 

Leica has shown it can make smart adapters.  This IMHO would constitute fulfilling its promise to R lens users.  Until this happens Leica's promises are empty.

 

Leitax made a 'manual' auto aperture with their special Leica R to Nikon F adapter. You have to press a tab on the adapter to focus at full aperture, no matter what aperture your lens is on. It is sort of the inverse of the DOF preview lever found on most SLR's. Not automatic, but looks like it will be a big help in focussing R lenses on Nikon bodies. Just received one and will be testing it shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone using the Sony a7ii as a backup to the M...... Something small with AF and on a full frame Sony/Leica sensor?

The AF on the Sony is pretty slow, you're better off with a rangefinder and zone focusing.

If you really need AF get a DSLR, generally the lenses are of much better quality than Sony's as well. Nobody does zooms as well as Canon. I use a 5D Mark III as my second camera. In terms of primes for EF mount, Sigma's Art series are the best. Sigma are underrated and often ignored, but in terms of primes they're beating everyone in the Canon/Nikon world. See here, the only 50mm lens which out performs the Sigma, is the Leica APO. http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2014/06/comparing-rangefinder-and-slr-50mm-lenses-version-0-7

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

Why is it then that Canon users are always buying adapters for there Canon cameras so that they can use Nikons 14/24 and 70/200

 

Go figure

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it then that Canon users are always buying adapters for there Canon cameras so that they can use Nikons 14/24 and 70/200

 

Go figure

It's all about the 14-24mm. Nikon's had an edge in wide angles. But not any more. Not since the 11-24mm.

 

Canon's been smiting over the D800 and 14-24mm, and has responded with the 5Ds and 11-24mm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone using the Sony a7ii as a backup to the M...... Something small with AF and on a full frame Sony/Leica sensor?

I do. Not really as backup, but pretty much as my main cameras. Sold my M8 and kept my M9, and supplemented them with a A7r and a A7II - which, at least in my book, are the superior tech.

I still like shooting my M9 and do so often (and get published), but the Sonys in combo with Leica glass are my prefered option.

Also, I can't say that the autofocus on their native lenses is slow - it's not great with moving objects, but even with old Minolta glass they are quite fast to lock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

 Sold my M8 and kept my M9, and supplemented them with a A7r and a A7II - which, at least in my book, are the superior tech.

 

 

How do you find the difference between the AF on the a7r compared to the new a7ii, my wife has the a7r and is complaining that the AF is slow 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you find the difference between the AF on the a7r compared to the new a7ii, my wife has the a7r and is complaining that the AF is slow 

 

I could never get the AF on my A7r to work reliably. A frustratingly large number of complete focus failures. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...