Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It only takes away a lot of money. :)

 

 

It costs what it's worth to the buyer

 

The Zeiss OTUS and Leica APO50 are breaking new ground. Yes the APO50 is a stop slower but it's a LOT smaller and lighter which is a trade off I'm willing to make

 

The Zeiss ZM lenses that are/were Made in Germany are very close to Leica prices

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know of a photographer with a great sense of mood, tone, wrap of light and stellar composition who is making stunning images with this lens?....because in an effort to kill time while uploading to FTP, I found absolutely nothing but flat-tastic snapshots....

 

Kind of sad really...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a link to one of Johannes Huwe's sets. This series taken with the Monochrom and 50 Apo is so breathtakingly beautiful that I get tempted to trade in a slightly used car for this camera-lens combo every time I look at the photos:

 

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are some I've taken recently with this lens. I love its images, but dislike the sloppy aperture ring, that is really too loose.

 

In one of these there is flare, but I find that in some situations it has a certain aesthetic appeal.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Edited by horosu
  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

 

  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a link to one of Johannes Huwe's sets. This series taken with the Monochrom and 50 Apo is so breathtakingly beautiful that I get tempted to trade in a slightly used car for this camera-lens combo every time I look at the photos:

 

 

Bet you couldn't pick out the ones in the set taken with the 35 Summicron rather than the 50 APO, if you didn't have any technical data.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, the reason I'm so interested in this lens is precisely because it adds no signature of itself and helps you capture what you see, how you see it

 

That's debatable iMHO. Every lens I own has some sort of signature.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bet you couldn't pick out the ones in the set taken with the 35 Summicron rather than the 50 APO, if you didn't have any technical data.

 

I wonder if I could. I don't see the technical data on flickr without trying to access the metadata, but I can tell you that the two photos called "Midnight Iceberg watching" blow me away (among some others). There are some photos that seem to be taken stopped down and i can't say much about those, but some photos stand out to me. I own a 35mm sum micron and while it is an incredible lens, the difference between sharp and out-of-focus areas with the 50 Apo is in a league of its own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are never going to get a definitive answer unless you take your own photos on your own camera of subjects you are familiar with to make a comparison.

 

That means either buying it or borrowing it.

 

I was going to write a long essay on why I find this lens so good ........ but in the end it is all subjective.

 

Suffice to say I have 50/0.95, 50/1.4, old 50/2, 50/2.8, 50/2 summitar, Zeiss 50/2 planar ...... and the Apo 50 is by far the best of the lot in image quality and all-round usability.

 

I waited 15 months for this lens so 'GAS delusional justification syndrome' was negligible and I had no expectations one way or the other about this lens. It IS superb.

 

'lens signature' is a bit like discussing art or music .... it is entirely in the eye of the beholder :rolleyes:.......

Edited by thighslapper
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I will never buy this lens but I encourage all who can to do so to help Leica stay in business (and remember there's a price increase on the way).

 

..... bearing in mind the complexity and the problems they have had with it I doubt it is particularly profitable in comparison to some of their other products ....... ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are never going to get a definitive answer unless you take your own photos on your own camera of subjects you are familiar with to make a comparison.
-> yeah, kind of. no harm in looking at what others have done. some nice people already contributed some images here.

 

 

I was going to write a long essay on why I find this lens so good ........ but in the end it is all subjective.
-> I would encourage you to write it anyway. im sure many people will find it useful. life itself is subjective but that doesnt mean we dont look around and pick up bits and pieces from others

 

 

Suffice to say I have 50/0.95, 50/1.4, old 50/2, 50/2.8, 50/2 summitar, Zeiss 50/2 planar ...... and the Apo 50 is by far the best of the lot in image quality and all-round usability.
-> see, this is fully subjective but you do take a solid stance! this comment helps me.

 

 

I waited 15 months for this lens so 'GAS delusional justification syndrome' was negligible and I had no expectations one way or the other about this lens. It IS superb.
-> thank you for the reinforcement, this does help. If you could kindly share some more images, id really appreciate it.

 

 

'lens signature' is a bit like discussing art or music .... it is entirely in the eye of the beholder :rolleyes:.......
-> true but if you dont listen to the music or watch the movie, how will you know if you like it or not? since this is not such a readily available off the shelf commodity, id like to see some images and hear opinions from the users of this lens.
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see the technical data on flickr without trying to access the metadata,

 

:confused: I opened your link as posted and clicked on the first photo, hitting right arrow to scroll. The lens used is clearly noted under each and every photo (just to the right of the comments).

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I know. All you have to do is sign into your flickr account and you see the data on the bottom. I had it in the black slideshow view that you get when you look at someone's sets and all that information is turned off. I will tell you this, when I actually did look it up, I was pretty right on between the 50 and the 35. The 75 summarit had me fooled in one photo.

 

But my original point still stands: this set show off wonderfully executed 50 Apo photos.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...