wogg Posted January 23, 2014 Share #21 Posted January 23, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Another marksmen thing: caffeine pretty much kills your steady hand. I can handhold 50mm at 1/15 pretty well at 24MP, but throw some coffee in there and forget it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 23, 2014 Posted January 23, 2014 Hi wogg, Take a look here Hand holding. Higher than focal lengths required for me.. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jaapv Posted January 23, 2014 Share #22 Posted January 23, 2014 Having to take ten shots to get one sharp one doesn't make it sound like a very reliable method. Not exactly decisive moment stuff.No -but not getting it is worse - and you forget the six ones that were fit to use, certainly better than cranking up the ISO. And what would you suggest as a method with no camera support available?. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted January 23, 2014 Share #23 Posted January 23, 2014 Why is ISO and a bit of 'grain' such a disadvantage? With film it was perfectly OK, are your film pictures now unusable, do you disown them? Even with a bit of digital noise through higher ISO a digital file can be cleaned up a bit, and at a higher shutter speed it will be sharp (although grainy). I think this thing about hand holding at slow shutter speeds comes down to trying to prove, or live up to, the equipment, and not just doing something sensible for the photograph. It's like being stuck in a theoretical game, just follow the ingrained myth about Leica's and hand holding and you win, but the photograph loses. It's trying to live up to 24mp and low ISO as a perfect example of craft/skill, rather than living up to the image you made as a good picture, which if it is good it still will be at high grainy ISO or not. Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted January 23, 2014 Share #24 Posted January 23, 2014 I prefer good photos to sharp photos, but another technique to help achieve the latter (that I don't recall seeing yet in the thread) is to use continuous shooting mode at reasonably fast speeds. I rarely do so, content to use single shot mode (or a tripod when circumstances dictate), but others may. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
almoore Posted January 23, 2014 Share #25 Posted January 23, 2014 I posted a consecutive series of ten 35 mm shots @ 1/4 sec on this forum. one was really blurred, two on the soft side but usable, six perfectly fine and one really sharp Are you really claiming that your hands are so steady that you can realistically expect nine out ten images taken handheld at a quarter of a second to be usable? Unless you were sitting down with your elbows braced against a table, this isn't remotely credible with a non-stabilised camera. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest redge Posted January 23, 2014 Share #26 Posted January 23, 2014 Gilgamesh, If you're near a dealer, try the hand grip. I got one (multifunctional in my case), and I think that it has noticeably improved the camera's handling, including steadiness. Coming from an M3, the camera felt big/awkward. The grip has really helped. Cheers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannybuoy Posted January 23, 2014 Share #27 Posted January 23, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Personally I have a very strong right arm from many, many years of vigorous excercise... That is key to a steady arm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 23, 2014 Share #28 Posted January 23, 2014 Are you really claiming that your hands are so steady that you can realistically expect nine out ten images taken handheld at a quarter of a second to be usable? Unless you were sitting down with your elbows braced against a table, this isn't remotely credible with a non-stabilised camera. I did post proof… I am supposed to be able to do high-precision work under a microscope handheld. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thighslapper Posted January 23, 2014 Share #29 Posted January 23, 2014 Are you really claiming that your hands are so steady that you can realistically expect nine out ten images taken handheld at a quarter of a second to be usable? Unless you were sitting down with your elbows braced against a table, this isn't remotely credible with a non-stabilised camera. .... sorry .... but this is perfectly possible .... in fact I set auto iso to 1/8sec as my minimum speed when using 35mm ... this is one of a whole evenings shooting in a house just lit by candles ..... 1/6sec, iso 1000, 28mm f 5.6 ...... as sharp as you will get at this iso... .... my rule of thumb is f/4 for shutter speed below 35mm.... Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/220724-hand-holding-higher-than-focal-lengths-required-for-me/?do=findComment&comment=2516858'>More sharing options...
Peter H Posted January 23, 2014 Share #30 Posted January 23, 2014 Personally I have a very strong right arm from many, many years of vigorous excercise... That is key to a steady arm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
almoore Posted January 23, 2014 Share #31 Posted January 23, 2014 I did post proof… I am supposed to be able to do high-precision work under a microscope handheld. You're a truly remarkable man Jaap... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted January 23, 2014 Share #32 Posted January 23, 2014 Personally I have a very strong right arm from many, many years of vigorous excercise... That is key to a steady arm If you have a heart beat, and you do, then arm strength means nothing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted January 23, 2014 Share #33 Posted January 23, 2014 ...Anyone else feel that this 21st century digital Leica has lost "something"... With a Thumbs Up quite the contrary to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 23, 2014 Share #34 Posted January 23, 2014 You're a truly remarkable man Jaap...Please tell my wife... it is just training. Ask any marksman. I would be rubbish at darts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
almoore Posted January 23, 2014 Share #35 Posted January 23, 2014 Please tell my wife... it is just training. Ask any marksman. I would be rubbish at darts. You're being too modest Jaap. We both know that if you took up darts you'd quickly be the best in the world. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 23, 2014 Share #36 Posted January 23, 2014 I wish - the pay is right... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest redge Posted January 23, 2014 Share #37 Posted January 23, 2014 Ask any marksman. I would be rubbish at darts. Great analogy. I shoot skeet/sporting clays, which is a lot like darts (with a shotgun, the idea is to ignore the sight and follow the target with your eye), and I'm playing with the idea of using Live View in a similar way (sort of like zone focusing and estimating the frame aka shooting from the hip). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaques Posted January 24, 2014 Share #38 Posted January 24, 2014 Personally I have a very strong right arm from many, many years of vigorous excercise... That is key to a steady arm the problem with that method is you go blind- so I have heard.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
01af Posted January 24, 2014 Share #39 Posted January 24, 2014 ... the M (Typ 240), for me, can no longer be shot at below the focal length. By that I mean with, say, a 50 mm lens, I am better off above 1/60 s and happier at 1/90 s. With my M6, it was always safe to shoot at least one stop under, so 1/30 s or 1/15 s, no problem. You probably never magnified your film shots in the past as much as you're magnifying your digital shots today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 24, 2014 Share #40 Posted January 24, 2014 Why is ISO and a bit of 'grain' such a disadvantage? With film it was perfectly OK, are your film pictures now unusable, do you disown them? Even with a bit of digital noise through higher ISO a digital file can be cleaned up a bit, and at a higher shutter speed it will be sharp (although grainy). I think this thing about hand holding at slow shutter speeds comes down to trying to prove, or live up to, the equipment, and not just doing something sensible for the photograph. It's like being stuck in a theoretical game, just follow the ingrained myth about Leica's and hand holding and you win, but the photograph loses. It's trying to live up to 24mp and low ISO as a perfect example of craft/skill, rather than living up to the image you made as a good picture, which if it is good it still will be at high grainy ISO or not. Steve Unfortunately, on the M8 and M9 one soon runs out of ISO. With the M240 the issue is lessened. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.