esophoria Posted December 3, 2013 Share #1 Posted December 3, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Download Leica M Camera Firmware 2.0.0.12 for OS Independent Nothing really new-- I updated anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 Hi esophoria, Take a look here New Firmware Released: 2.0.0.12. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
paulsydaus Posted December 3, 2013 Share #2 Posted December 3, 2013 A firmware update with no changes, for "internal production purposes". How odd... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecar Posted December 3, 2013 Share #3 Posted December 3, 2013 They probably had to replace some internal component with a new part, which in turn required a FW tweak. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thighslapper Posted December 3, 2013 Share #4 Posted December 3, 2013 They probably had to replace some internal component with a new part, which in turn required a FW tweak. Yup. Leica blurb says identical to 2.0.0.11 and current users need not update. 2.0.0.12 shipped with new cameras. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest odeon Posted December 3, 2013 Share #5 Posted December 3, 2013 I must ask... "What about auto-ISO?" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brill64 Posted December 3, 2013 Share #6 Posted December 3, 2013 Thank you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hansmezger Posted December 3, 2013 Share #7 Posted December 3, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) I must ask... "What about auto-ISO?" R.I.P Auto Iso.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
george + Posted December 3, 2013 Share #8 Posted December 3, 2013 The official site says: "Improvements in firmware version 2.0.0.12 versus previous version 2.0.0.11 All new cameras being produced now have a new firmware version 2.0.0.12 installed on. An update for already delivered cameras with version 2.0.0.11 is not necessary, as the changes implemented only apply to the internal production processes. On the application level, no difference between 2.0.0.11 and 2.0.0.12 can be recognized. Nevertheless, we provide version 2.0.0.12 through our website, because every camera is compatible with Version 2.0.0.12" The bolding is my addition. Odd indeed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
01af Posted December 3, 2013 Share #9 Posted December 3, 2013 They probably had to replace some internal component with a new part, which in turn required a FW tweak. Sounds plausible to me Odd indeed. If you imagine the uproar of the existing M owners left behind with their out-dated 2.0.0.11 firmware while new M owners are ahead of them then it won't appear so odd anymore Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mirekti Posted December 3, 2013 Share #10 Posted December 3, 2013 Nevertheless, we provide version 2.0.0.12 through our website, because every camera is compatible with Version 2.0.0.12" Does this really mean there are two or more types of M typ240? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
01af Posted December 3, 2013 Share #11 Posted December 3, 2013 Does this really mean there are two or more types of M (Typ 240)? This is a pointless question on at least two levels. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcg Posted December 3, 2013 Share #12 Posted December 3, 2013 This is a pointless question on at least two levels. I'd be interested to know what two those levels are - but in the mean time, I doubt if you could say that there are two types of M - but there could be two editions. In other words - they are identical but merely different production batches. One would hope that if there is any quality difference, it would be that the later one one is more refined in some way - but in fact they are probably indistinguishable. Once again, Leica's poor communication skills stresses customers and tests customer confidence and customer loyalty - there's three levels for you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
01af Posted December 3, 2013 Share #13 Posted December 3, 2013 I'd be interested to know what two those levels are ... When thinking of it, actually it's three levels. First level—mirekti's question asks for confirmation of a statement that has never been made. Second level—it totally does not make any difference whether there are two (or more) versions of the M. Most likely, there were many internal versions of every M model in the past, and no-one ever cared (except service technicians). Third level—no-one can answer mirekti's question anyway, because we simply don't know. All we can do is speculate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcg Posted December 3, 2013 Share #14 Posted December 3, 2013 When thinking of it, actually it's three levels. First level—mirekti's question asks for confirmation of a statement that has never been made. Second level—it totally does not make any difference whether there are two (or more) versions of the M. Most likely, there were many internal versions of every M model in the past, and no-one ever cared (except service technicians). Third level—no-one can answer mirekti's question anyway, because we simply don't know. All we can do is speculate. Well, thank you. I'm sure that is a lot clearer to everyone now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mirekti Posted December 3, 2013 Share #15 Posted December 3, 2013 I'm sorry, I didn't want to stir it up. It was rather confusing what I read. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcg Posted December 3, 2013 Share #16 Posted December 3, 2013 You shouldn't apologise. There are some people here who hand out some rough handling in a way which they would never dream of if they were talking to you face-to-face. It is one of the unfortunate features of forums everywhere. You are right to ask questions - and most people will be pleased to answer politely and to be as helpful as possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
george + Posted December 3, 2013 Share #17 Posted December 3, 2013 My German is a bit rusty but I think they meant to say: " (We just want to let you know that) new cameras (these days) have Firmware version 2.0.0.12 installed. (But please do not worry.) Updating of cameras with version .11 installed is not necessary because the changes only relate to internal processes. (that are none of your concerns) (As far as we know) versions .11 and .12 (have the same functions and features) and work the same way. (We simply) offer version .12 to you as it works on all (M) cameras. (And a Merry Xmas to you all!) " Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Telfs Posted December 3, 2013 Share #18 Posted December 3, 2013 The official site says: "Improvements in firmware version 2.0.0.12 versus previous version 2.0.0.11 All new cameras being produced now have a new firmware version 2.0.0.12 installed on. An update for already delivered cameras with version 2.0.0.11 is not necessary, as the changes implemented only apply to the internal production processes. On the application level, no difference between 2.0.0.11 and 2.0.0.12 can be recognized. Nevertheless, we provide version 2.0.0.12 through our website, because every camera is compatible with Version 2.0.0.12" The bolding is my addition. Odd indeed. Most likely a change to a hidden feature used in factory testing or, as has been said, to accommodate changed components. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted December 3, 2013 Share #19 Posted December 3, 2013 I'm sorry, I didn't want to stir it up. It was rather confusing what I read. Some people need to bother others to make themselves feel good. Nothing to worry about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 3, 2013 Share #20 Posted December 3, 2013 When thinking of it, actually it's three levels. First level—mirekti's question asks for confirmation of a statement that has never been made. Second level—it totally does not make any difference whether there are two (or more) versions of the M. Most likely, there were many internal versions of every M model in the past, and no-one ever cared (except service technicians). Third level—no-one can answer mirekti's question anyway, because we simply don't know. All we can do is speculate.One member wanted to take Leica to court for motherboard change on the M8… http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m8-forum/34434-firmware-1-108-not-available-4.html#post360490 Read the whole thread for hilarious entertainment…http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m8-forum/34434-firmware-1-108-not-available.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.