Jump to content

marcg

Members
  • Content Count

    1,492
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About marcg

  • Rank
    Erfahrener Benutzer

Profile Information

  • Location
    Virtually everywhere
  • Country
    United Kingdom

Recent Profile Visitors

652 profile views
  1. The running time of both batteries is excellent
  2. I'm just giving this heads up in case anybody is interested – but maybe everybody knew it already and I was the last to find out. Anyway I was charging my batteries and for some reason or other I used a "PD" Power Delivery mains adapter. To my surprise, the little screen on the Nitecore charger started to display "quick charge" and the charging display started to change very quickly. Not only that, instead of simply charging one battery at a time as it normally does, both batteries are charging at the same time and at the same rate. Mind you, the whole thing started to get very hot
  3. I've just discovered this discussion here https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4539403 Which pretty well covers everything and in fact the OP in that thread says Which confirms the impression I had formed. One very interesting comment is and so what I'm starting to understand is that you can use either of the two versions of the 90 mm lens with the adapter in place and in that case you would use the lens and its collapsed state as a normal lens but extended for macro. The advantage of the newer version – 11670 – seems to be that because you can lock it clos
  4. Thanks. That's what I'm trying to find out. I'm trying to find out if both lenses can be used with the new adapter and what difference in usage might there be
  5. One of the problems with many of the discussions on this forum are that they don't refer to them by their numbers. They refer to them simply as "old" and "new" but as there are at least three collapsible lenses, it's never really clear what they're talking about
  6. Thanks for this. It's helpful. I keep on seeing that the adapter is designed for use with the 11670. I'd like to know what disadvantages they would be using it with the 11633 – which is generally speaking a slightly cheaper lens.
  7. Thanks for this. I was looking for a bit more narrative then rather than a list of specifications. I expect the wiki pages useful for somebody who is extremely technical – and I am certainly not
  8. I be grateful if somebody could run very quickly through the differences between these two lenses. They've been discussed in bits and pieces on this forum but I can't find any particular point by point comparison. I think I'm particularly interested in their use with the macro adapter 14652 Thanks
  9. Thank you but I didn't really understand the point of it indoors
  10. Why did you use the filter for this?
  11. I thought it was Rum. I hitchhiked there in 1970 on my way to Petra. Visited several times since then and it's become very touristy – as has Petra
×
×
  • Create New...