Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
romanvail

Post-processing for the M8: What is the Leica-look?

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hello all.

 

I am new to Leica and absolutely have bought in (more ways than one) to the whole philosophy... but something is on my mind:

 

If everyone -- and I use that loosely, not to offend anyone -- uses the same LR or PS presets, filters, etc... what exactly is the quantitative benefit from using a camera like the one we all have?

 

Is there a particular benefit that these programs receive from the DNG or JPG files we feed them?

 

Or is it just about the feel of the camera and all this digital stuff just about the same?

 

How should we approach that "leica-look"?

 

-------

 

I am basically trying to discover a good workflow and see if the in-camera processing or desktop variety best in general? Obviously we all have varying taste and eyes but I am curious what better and more seasoned photographers have to say.

 

Thanks.

 

-------

 

Roman Vail

 

Leica M8

Leica 90mm f/2

Carl Zeiss 28mm f/2.8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The file format color Leica was trying to achieve was Kodachrome so they say.

 

Use the "embedded" camera profile and it comes out straight away provided you have taken the photo with uv/ir filter and the white balance is correct and your monitor is profiled to correct color. Without the uv/ir filter, the camera produces rather off colors, worst being some black objects will go purple, but all colors are off to one degree or another.

 

Actually the profile is off realism so feel free to change the colors.

 

I have used the adobe profile editor to neutralize what the camera firmware does. My skies are no longer cyan, flesh is normal.

 

If you like the color, do nothing.

 

The benefit from Leica is the small size compared to full frame slr and the lenses tend to be sharper at wide stops. There is no AA filter or a more subdued one in front of the sensor which leads to a sharper image all other things being equal. The disadvantage is moire occasionally.

Edited by tobey bilek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh thanks. I guess that makes sense, with a Kodak developed sensor inside the M8.

 

Good to know. What are some filters you like to use?

 

So using another film type with the "native" kodachrome -- is that what really throws off color you mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Occasionally the Leica swing out pola filter to control reflections off leaves and to saturate colors, Never for sky control.

 

All lenses are fitted with B+W 486 uv.ir filter which I leave on when using the M9.

 

When I buy a lens, I just order the filter with it. Without the filter, all colors are ruined. I tried doing some corrections in PS and could not repair them to my satisfaction.

 

Leica tried to match Kodachrome colors for whatever reason. The S2 for $25000 is the same. The M9 largely corrects it. In my experience, all camera manufactures try to achieve a neutral balance .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No such thing as the Leica look. Show people prints and they won't know the camera or lens used, let alone PP techniques employed. Nor will they care.

 

It's still about the pics, and the skill of the photographer, just as it always has been. Lots of people bought the same film cameras and/or used the same darkroom equipment; thankfully that never resulted in one 'look' for each combination.

 

DNG affords the most creative flexibility, and better preserves future control. But, even then, no law against using JPEG, nor will anyone know.

 

Create your own vision and style. Lots of ways to get there, with lots of gear and materials.

 

And make prints. If one only produces for the screen, one has no idea how the 'look' appears on someone else's screen.

 

Jeff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

How should we approach that "leica-look"?

 

 

By forgetting you ever saw it.

 

Concentrate on your own look, make the camera do what you want it to do.

 

There is no harm in taking inspiration from other photographers, but take it from their work not the camera they use. In reality there is no 'Leica look', pre-sets and JPEG's are just starting points, invented by somebody in a lab who wrote some software so the images hopefully don't look dire if you do nothing to them. That is the camera creating an image. Photography is when the photographer makes decisions.

 

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

No such thing as the Leica look. Show people prints and they won't know the camera or lens used, let alone PP techniques employed. Nor will they care.

 

It's still about the pics, and the skill of the photographer, just as it always has been. Lots of people bought the same film cameras and/or used the same darkroom equipment; thankfully that never resulted in one 'look' for each combination.

 

DNG affords the most creative flexibility, and better preserves future control. But, even then, no law against using JPEG, nor will anyone know.

 

Create your own vision and style. Lots of ways to get there, with lots of gear and materials.

 

And make prints. If one only produces for the screen, one has no idea how the 'look' appears on someone else's screen.

 

Jeff

 

 

Yes, I definitely appreciate that. I had a few Canon cameras with good lenses and made some comparisons to the M8 I have now: similar shots with similar DOF feel better like the focus really wraps around the subject. Plus everything just seems cleaner so long as I stay under an ISO of 640.

 

Perhaps I got better? Perhaps I am naturally drawn to this feel of camera where I dont rely on AF or free-for-all, any ISO is good mentality with a 5DIII?

 

I gather that because now I have to really think about the shots, focusing on the photo/subject that it just yields better results... and in that Leica cameras are genius.

 

But I still feel like it just looks better, feels better... I mean, if it all didnt really matter --we'd be using camera phones. Good thing camera bodies do actually mean something.

 

Thanks for all the encouragement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I mean, if it all didnt really matter --we'd be using camera phones

 

Most people do these days, and don't make prints. But I've seen some wonderful prints using phones, and I bet you would have no idea about the gear used if not told.

 

A happy photographer likely takes more pics, and increases the odds for better pics, so if the camera makes you happy, then there's that. And sometimes there are technical needs that require a certain type of gear.

 

In the digital realm, though, I generally get much bigger bang for the buck investing time and money in what happens after I take the pic...papers, printer, inks, profiles, editing software, technique improvements, etc....than from any camera upgrade.

 

Of course not of that matters without a good pic to start. And that's not camera specific, but deserves the most attention.

 

Jeff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People spoke of the 'Leica look' long before any digital cameras came along, so it has nothing to do with the M8 as such.

 

It applied to the earlier cameras and lenses - I don't know when the phrase was first used but I suspect is has more to do with the style of photography that a small rangefinder camera with a relatively fast and useable lens encouraged. So we're talking about the original Leica's.

 

Of course plenty of other rangefinder cameras followed, so the 'Leica look' isn't exclusive to Leica, and as a photographer you should be defining your own look, not trying to emulate a generic style.

 

Finally, I'd be happy to be able to produce images like these with any camera, let alone an iphone! Do these have the 'Leica look'? Flickr: Basetrack's Photostream

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Steve_4802
      Hi,
      l’ve a 50mm Summicron and 90mm elmarit; both stellar lenses. I’ve had these lenses for a good few years and don’t have any desire for more. From the get go I was sure to source lenses with common filter sizes, in this instance 39mm. I shoot quite a lot of film with my M6, both colour and BW. Its on the way back (in the post) with a viewfinder upgrade and CLA so looking forward to giving it a good run feeding it lots more film. 
      I’ve a B+W F- Pro orange filter that I use a little and I’d like to add to this. Specifically a green filter for BW portraits, to experiment on my young surfer son who’s seven with some cute freckles. Also, for colour negative, typically with Portra, I’d like to get my hands on warming and cooling filters to try and get more consistent results and minimise colour shifts. This is particularly relevant as finding a good local scanner operator is a challenge; it’s not an excuse, just another reason to try and minimise any requirement for corrections at the scanner,
      i note Leica make some black and white filters, including a green filter, so that would likely cover off my requirement for BW, however, I’m stumped for warming and cooling filters, particularly in the 39mm size. I tried a camera store this afternoon to see what they may be able to get and was advised they’re unable to help me as there’s little need these days with digital; fair enough. Most ideally too, I’d like nice brass filters like the B+W F-Pro series, they’re very nicely made bits of kit.
      As I’d like to keep the setup compact, I don’t wish to use step downs or larger filters, I’d like to stick with 39mm. So, we’ll made brass 39mm filters; colour for BW and warming / cooling for colour neg.
      Any recommendations on where I might find the above? New or used? Thanks.
      And for a bit of fun, who else is using warming and cooling filters for colour neg film? I’ve an old Lumu light meter; I’m considering upgrading to the newer one simply for better understanding of colour temp variance, and flash measurement. FYI, the lumu’s are a great little light meter; I keep mine on my phone always, often even if I don’t have a camera with me!
      Cheers,
      Steve
       
       
    • By MikeMyers
      I think this is an impossible question to ask, without someone seeing it in person, but back in the 1960's and 70's I accumulated a small collection of Leica gear, most of which went into storage when I got into digital.  Then Leica came out with the M8 and M8.2, so I bought one as soon as I could afford it.  When I read about the problem the camera had with infrared, for me that was a bonus - I wanted to take infrared photos, and now I had a chance.  I did this back in 2009 and 2010, and then I mostly moved on to other things.  I've now got a M10, and all my other gear is put away in drawers, but I again want to start taking infrared photos.
      50 or so years ago I got what was supposed to be a Leica infrared filter that screws into my equally old 50mm Summicron.  There are no markings on the filter, but I've been using it all this time.  I know there are several filters I can buy nowadays, but my first question is whether anyone recognizes this as a Leica filter.  Did Leica make several variations of this, or was this "it".  
      It's nice that I can take hand-held photos with the M8.2 using this filter.  
      A related question is about focusing.  I read that on the 50mm Summicron, I need to focus normally, then take the distance mark on the lens and turn the focus adjustment such that this mark is now opposite the f/5.6 mark that's used for depth of field.  (from here:  https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/why-no-ir-mark-on-summicron-50mm.162704/ )
      I'm surprised there are no markings on the filter.  

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By piran
      Did you need the yellow filter for the clouds? Could similar or same be achieved post? Having specified a Q2M I wonder whether I should be looking out to fit yellow or orange glass in front of all that nice Q2M design?
    • By joshjeremyphoto
      Whenever I use the in camera filters they don't stay on when I upload the RAW to Lightroom. The preview of the image shows it with the ffilter but when I click on it it goes back to normal where there is no filter applied. Please help. 

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By Anthony C
      Hi,
      I have both a Leica Q and a D-Lux 7 and I use Lightroom to edit my pics. I have quite a bit of purchased presets as well.
      With the Q, no issue at all.
      With the D-Lux, even though my picture are taken in colour and imported in RAW format, some of the presets think the picture is black and white and show me options only in B&W. I have to manually go to the Colour option and click on it to see what the reworked photo looks in colour.
      Anyone with the same issue ? Thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...