Jump to content

Recommended Posts

x

First test shot from Univex Mercury cc. She has a keen interest in my fiddling with old cameras, knowing that success means a walk to test further.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
  • Haha 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, John Robinson said:

There are many reasons to like film.  Trawling through old negatives from the mid-2000s (not to mention the 1970s and 80s) reminded me of the endless "film vs digital" arguments that raged at the time (now, thankfully, died down).  One thing that cannot be disputed is the function of film as an archival medium.  I can go back to my collection of negatives and transparencies and re-scan using the latest technology.   Of course, a well-kept digital raw file offers the same possibilities but there are two critical differences:  digital preservation is a more demanding discipline than keeping film safe (think about the need to migrate to new media and possibly new file formats every five years or so);  in the 2000s the only option to shoot a native 25Mpixel or higher-resolution digital image cost tens of thousands of dollars (e.g. Phase One P25 or P30+) whereas a well-exposed negative or transparency could be scanned to 25Mpixel using a modestly-priced (by comparison) scanner.  Hence the film vs digital arguments.

Today there are plenty of affordable digital cameras yielding 25Mpixel or higher-resolution, often using the same lenses as the previous film cameras.  This creates the opportunity for a different conversation.  Is there a "look" about film images that is different from similar images taken on a digital camera?  Is there a reason why some film-makers still insist on shooting 35 or 70mm film before transferring to digital for post-production?  Why is one of my old photographer colleagues still lugging around a 10x8 view camera for his landscape work?

My observation, comparing images from the Leica M9 or SL with my scanned film images is that there is something "clinical" about digital images.  For commercial work, publication, syndication etc this is no doubt an advantage.  For other purposes ...

Looking back at the mid-2000 pictures from London's Regent Park, taken with a 1958 M2, I am struck by the purposeful walking that seems to go across species barriers.  A metaphor perhaps?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

I was in the same loop for quite some time, posting a lot in this thread. Now, I feel all boils down to those two: film's flaws have some artistic touch, and there is something magic about all-manual, all-metal cameras.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica M4-P 35 FLE HP5 in HC110-B

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 
  • Like 18
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 20 Stunden schrieb adelie:
Milford Sound - New Zealand.
 
Leica M5 - 35mm Summicron f/8 on Kodachrome 64 colour slide film.
 
Image taken March 1979.
 
Scanned today on a Nikon Coolscan 8000 with Silverfast 8.8 HDRi Archive Suite.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Wow, still looks so good!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gray on Gray
M-A APO 50 ADOX Color Implosion & Fuji Natura

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

Am 5.12.2020 um 15:11 schrieb Wayne:

An oddity: pre-WWII Univex Mercury cc camera, Wollensak Tricor Anastigmat 35/3.5 Half-frame.

It has a rotating disc shutter mechanism, kind of like the valve configuration on old two-stroke motorcycles. Was able to get it working simply through application of WD40.

Long expired Fuji Superia 100

 

Am 5.12.2020 um 15:20 schrieb Wayne:

First test shot from Univex Mercury cc. She has a keen interest in my fiddling with old cameras, knowing that success means a walk to test further.

Wayne, an expired film, a revived camera, the dog looking tired--I hope You  are OK ??!   Na, seriously: your photos have a quality of their own and are unmistakable. Just great. 

vor 22 Stunden schrieb Charles Morgan:

The River Meavy bridge at Meavy

Leica R8, Summicron R 35mm f2, Ilford HP5 at 250 in PMK Pyro. Only early afternoon early winter sun ever catches this side.

...and you were there !  I love it, a lot to see on the photo. 

Edited by Kl@usW.
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

IMS Rio de Janeiro by JM__, on Flickr

Acros 100 - 24x27 Leica M - 35 Canon 1.5 LTM 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2020 at 3:39 PM, benqui said:

M-A, Apo 50, Ilford Delta 400, X-Tol, NegLabPro

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Regardless of the hyperbole surrounding this lens...it does draw rather nicely (in the right hands). 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Silbersalz35 ISO 50 CineFilm, Leica R9, Angenieux 70-210mm f/3.5 R mount lens.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 14
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Acros 100 - 24x27 Leica M -  2,8cm f6.3 Nickel Hektor 1935

Edited by JMF
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...