Overgaard Posted May 31, 2013 Share #1 Posted May 31, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) The first article in my Leica M 240 installment will be released via my newsletter first. To get the article, sign up for the newsletter for free at the top of the website THORSTEN OVERGAARD official homepage since 1996 - Danish feature writer and photographer The article will grow with a few pages over the next days and then be available also via link. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205782-new-leica-m-240-article-at-overgaarddk/?do=findComment&comment=2335456'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 31, 2013 Posted May 31, 2013 Hi Overgaard, Take a look here New Leica M 240 article at overgaard.dk. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
01af Posted May 31, 2013 Share #2 Posted May 31, 2013 No, I won't "sign up" for anything, even when it's "free" And you should at least get the camera's official name right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Overgaard Posted May 31, 2013 Author Share #3 Posted May 31, 2013 That's fair enough 01af. I have newsletters I hate to get and others I appreciate. I hope those who get mine appreciate the information, and having a newsletter and a mailing list allow me to send out proactive to those who want that information. The articles are still for free for everyone. Just this time I decided to give the 'subscribers' some days to be the first to know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwbell Posted May 31, 2013 Share #4 Posted May 31, 2013 I'll wait for the link. I appreciate your effort, and do enjoy reading your opinions, but man have I got enough crap filling my inbox already. You see if I let you go that route, you'll go from being 'interesting Leica related article guy" to "another annoying spammer". And I'd not want that to happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
01af Posted May 31, 2013 Share #5 Posted May 31, 2013 And I'd not want that to happen. Of the two of us, you're the better diplomat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Albertson Posted May 31, 2013 Share #6 Posted May 31, 2013 I'll wait for the link. I appreciate your effort, and do enjoy reading your opinions, but man have I got enough crap filling my inbox already. You see if I let you go that route, you'll go from being 'interesting Leica related article guy" to "another annoying spammer". And I'd not want that to happen. But if you sign up for it, it's not really spam. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-hawinkler Posted May 31, 2013 Share #7 Posted May 31, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Of the two of us, you're the better diplomat Diplomat? Chuckle, chuckle! :D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnbuckley Posted May 31, 2013 Share #8 Posted May 31, 2013 Thorsten - happy to get the emails. Thank you. JB Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalfx Posted May 31, 2013 Share #9 Posted May 31, 2013 looking forward to it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwbell Posted May 31, 2013 Share #10 Posted May 31, 2013 But if you sign up for it, it's not really spam. Yes, point taken. How about "traffic"? Of which I have too much. Diplomat? Chuckle, chuckle! :D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-hawinkler Posted May 31, 2013 Share #11 Posted May 31, 2013 :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalfx Posted June 1, 2013 Share #12 Posted June 1, 2013 No, I won't "sign up" for anything, even when it's "free" And you should at least get the camera's official name right. did you have a rough night? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
South Bird Posted June 1, 2013 Share #13 Posted June 1, 2013 I thought the premise of the article that the measure of the camera for an a photographer is more about how the user interacts with it rather than a technical dissertation on the specifications was insightful. I found the review quite helpful and look forward to more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jager Posted June 1, 2013 Share #14 Posted June 1, 2013 Thorsten - happy to get the emails. Thank you. JB And I, as well. Thanks for what you do, Thorsten... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted June 1, 2013 Share #15 Posted June 1, 2013 HI Thorsten Thank you - as always I enjoyed the article very much all the best Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
platypus Posted June 1, 2013 Share #16 Posted June 1, 2013 I read your article (emailed) first thing this morning and quite enjoyed it. Thank you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirkwilliam3 Posted June 1, 2013 Share #17 Posted June 1, 2013 Enjoyed this article (review)..The M is a Leica. Thats the important thing...always great to see the accompanying photographs.michaelphalingphotography - Home Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedaes Posted June 1, 2013 Share #18 Posted June 1, 2013 Great review - thanks. look forward to next instalment! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erudolph Posted June 2, 2013 Share #19 Posted June 2, 2013 I really enjoyed reading part 1 of your review. Thanks Thorsten! Had not realized that there are virtual filters for black and white in the jpeg menu. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gpwhite Posted June 2, 2013 Share #20 Posted June 2, 2013 Thorsten, I took the plunge and passed along my e-mail to your web-bot... your article is delightful and certainly captured my (amateur) sentiments precisely. I sold my M9 to my dealer rather quickly after fully adopting my new M240. And I do not like EVF, except for its practicality with my 135 APO. I have a particular question for you about most of the images you include on your new M240 article. You use the Noctilux very well, and I am impressed by its apparent smoothness over the 50 SX ASPH. Are all, or almost all, of your posted Noctilux shots taken wide open? Case in point for me would a comparison of say your daughter in front of the Eiffel Tower or the absolutely exquisite wooden deck chair shot with fluid blue sea background vs. the Peter Karbe with lens notebook shot from 50 AA (which to me looks like f/2.8, given the spectacular crispness of both his spectacles and chin stuble). I traded my 50 SX ASPH in to fund my 50 AA. Although I am addicted to the qualities of the 50 AA, it does have a more structured bokeh, as you see in your Karbe shot. Your beautiful images with the Noctilux make me want to try one out, so I thought I would ask if your shots are wide open and any comments you might make versus 50 SX on M240? Thank you, and please come teach a class here in the US! Peter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.