Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Since re-discovering my love of LTM screw cameras (thanks to finding such a wonderful iiif in CPH) and really enjoying using it, I have been trying to find out which is the 50 LTM lens I most like to use for day-to-day shooting.

 

I ran a little, unscientific, test on Monday - shooting the dozen or so 50 and longer screw lenses I have at home on an M9 (and some on an iiic but don't have the negs back yet), just boring slef-ps in the mirror.

 

I have a very bad, fogged Summitar f2 which is only good for putting on display, a good collipsible Summicron f2, the mint red Elmar f3.5 which came with the mint iiif, at least 3 Canons (50/1.2, 50/1.4 and 50 1.8) a Nikkor-HC 50 f2 LTM (Sonnar design) and a few, very variable, Russians (the best of whic is the Jupiter 3).

 

I whittled it down to 6 (one of which is an 85, not a 50), and of the 5 remaining 50s have decided I like best either the Nikkor f2 or the Jupiter - 3 (but at fs) for the Sonnarish dreamy look wide open, but with the mint Elmar 50/3.5 a very close second, and if I don't want to shoot wide open given its size etc a first.

 

The Summicron is a great all round performer, but I think I prefer the look of the Nikkor or the Elmar. Gues sit looks more vintage, or something, which is what I want when shooting screw. The Canons were either too sharp (nevertheless good lenses) such as the 50/1.8 or too soft and big, such as the 50/1.2. The 50/1.4 is a good compromise though and comes in 4th for me, it gives you sharpness and yet can do well, not so sharp, at f1.4 so if very fast. Plus not too big.

 

I have never tried a Summarit 1.5 but guess it is unlikely to give me anything the 50 Nikkor or Jupiter 3 cannot. Am I right? I think if I buy another 50 Leica it will be another 50 Elmar f3.5, but a user one this time as my mint one is only aloud out on special days.

 

Here are my favourite 3 (no clues what is what), and link to the other 3 below (which also has the answers). I'm interested to know what 50 screws others prefer, and why...

 

Leica screw mount (LTM) lenses - a set on Flickr

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

My 1948 Summitar is an excellent performer, as is the IIIc my aunt bought with it back then in Germany - although the IIIc chrome is now rough.

I have a 1941 f3.5 Elmar that is better than expected, but usually use a later f2.8 Elmar on my IIIf.

I also have a Nikkor 50 f2 that came on a Nicca (Tower), Canon 50 f1.8 and f1.4 that are nice, and an early Zunow 50 f1.1 (type 1) that is still out for repair.

For modern LTMs I have Voigtlander 50 f2.5 that is nice size for the cameras, but not too sharp; a nickel-plated Heliar 50 f2.0 that is very nice in size and results (except for focus shift); and a 50 Nokton f1.5 that is the best performing of my LTMs, but too big and blocks too much of the finders. (Very nice with adapter on M bodies though.)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nick,

 

Glad to hear that you're taken with your 50/3.5 Elmar it's a beauty! You might like to consider a Nippon Kogaku 50/1.4 (Nikkor), which is also a Sonnar with all the delicious dreaminess wide open but nicely sharp when stopped down. They're a little more difficult to find in LTM but they're around. I have one and if you'd like to try it PM to arrange to meet up.

 

Pete.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Comparison between Summitar and Nikkor depends on what you value - some may prefer either one. Also - I don't think my Nikkor has been serviced since new, so the "glow" and softness may be hazy coatings, and looking close I think it tends to near-focus a bit. But, since you asked, here are some 100% M9 crops taken in a mirror, handheld. I know most would say you need to compare only tripod-mounted, etc. - but that's not how I use them; so shake and body movement may contribute, etc.

I much prefer using the Summitar to the Nikkor. The handling and focusing are faster and easier for me.

Besides the Summitar and Nikkor, I threw in the modern Heliar and Nokton as reference. All at f2.0. (Nokton is an f1.5 Aspherical lens.)

The Heliar also has nice handling, and is styled like the '30s-'40s lenses, so it fits the LTM cameras well. I like the images wide open, and it gains "snap" as stopped down - but does shift focus. The 1.5 Nokton has very fast focusing, image quality near that of a v2 Summilux, but the body is too large diameter for a III series Leica, as even the BACK of the lens blocks part of the viewfinder.

First: indicated focus on my eye, Summitar thru Nokton as above:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Then focus on the front of lens, same order:

Edited by TomB_tx
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say, if you want a "modern" rendition (which I don't particularly, on LTM) I have high praise for the CV 50mm 2.5 in screw mount. I had one for a while and it was a very good performer.

 

Regards.

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Skopar 2.5 is a nice little lens for an LTM - styling matches, compact, and short even with the supplied hood:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

The silver model is actually chromed brass, unlike most Voigtlander silver lenses.

The sample I have is quite soft wide open compared to my other LTM lenses, which is why I didn't propose this one. Sean Reid has seen sample variation, and shows one sample that is much sharper than mine.

It is nice to use, small enough that it just barely visible in the bottom of the IIIc viewfinder window

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments and tips

Since using the LTMs every day, and the lenses on my M9 too, I'm still very wedded to the Nikkor f2, I am finding the Elmar 50 3.5 very consistent and good (I had to buy another user one I like it so much) and, I found a good priced, good condition Summarit today to add to my collection. So far very happy with the Summarit - will ost some photos on my blog soon when I get them done...

 

Meanwhile, moving away from 50, I'm really enjoying the Canon 35/2 LTM I dusted off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was thinking you should try the summarit 50/1.5 and, lo and behold, you've found one already! i'm sure you'll be pleased with the results.

 

greetings from hamburg

 

rick

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A very interesting thread! For me, it is indisputable that the best 50mm LTM lens is the Elmar f3.5 - absolutely no question...

 

It is the only one I have. ;)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the 2 best of are the 2 shown on this pict :

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the 2 best of are the 2 shown on this pict :

Oooh that screwmount Summilux looks lovely, JC!:) Is that one from the special issue made for the Asian market in c. 2000?

 

Pete.

Edited by farnz
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oooh that screwmount Summilux looks lovely, JC!:)Is that one from the special issue made for the Asian market in c. 2000?

 

Pete.

No it is the one described by philipus :

Nope, that is this Summilux. I love it but it's not very "Barnack". Unless I'm entirely mistaken JC's showing the Summilux I.

 

Absolutely !

as the Summicron 2/50 Rigid on the left

Edited by jc_braconi
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The CV 50mm f3.5 Heliar is an outstanding lens (if you can find a copy). Puts considers it as good as or possibly even better than the Elmar 50mm f3.5. My copy is certainly a great performer but I can't say it's better than my RS Elmar. Of course I don't have an optical bench...

 

Regards, Jim

 

Sent from my iPad using Forum Runner

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...