Jump to content

In Praise of the 4.0/90 Macro-Elmar M


MarkP

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Not unusual with the M8 as f/2.8 is not far from the limit of its RF accuracy. Did you try a magnifier? BTW my sample had focus problems on the M8.2 as well. It needed to be adjusted for digital according to my local workshop who fixed it easily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would love to see more samples of this lens. btw, please keep them coming!

 

Just for you. From this afternoon. Handheld, no PP or cropping. Nothing exceptional photographically, but it proves the lens can draw sharp pictures ;)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would love to see more samples of this lens. btw, please keep them coming!

F/4 on M8.2.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is a Summicron 5cm f/2 collapsible and SOOKY-M / SOMKY a more usefull alternative than an additional Makro-Elmar 4.0/90mm, when it's necessary to travel with less equipment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Interesting question. I never owned SOOKY-M myself so I really do not know how the rig performs. But I gues it really boils down to two things. Firstly, the 90 Macro Elmar is an exceptionally good lens in its own right, probably better optically than the older 5cm collapsible Summicron. What macro ratio do you want to obtain? The 90 Macro Elmar give you a 1:3 ratio. As for the SOOKY-M alternative I haven't got a clue.

 

And secondly, it depends on what other lenses you want to carry. Do you want a 35/90 pair or do you prefer a 28/50 pair? Or just a single lens? If you own a more modern 50mm, say the Summilux ASPH or even the APO Summicron you would be reluctant to leave any of those behind when traveling. And carrying TWO separate 50mm lenses would just be silly. If you own the SOOKY-M.

 

I am just rambling...

 

If you own the SOOKY-M and 5 cm collapsible Summicron, why don't you take them for a spin and let us know ;)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

...

 

The field of application of SOMKY here's something special:

Those who participate in guided tours through the Alps from hut to hut, may carry a maximum weight of 8 up to 9 kg on their backs.

I outsmart something in which I fill my water bottle after controlling weight and hiding the Leica under my jacket.;)

 

Actually the Leica M8 is too heavy for those mountain trips, especially if additionally spare batteries and the charger may need to be worn.

Because capacity only remains for one or two lenses, I use the Summicron 28 mm and 50 mm Summicron collapsible, which will change on the M8 to focal lengths of 36 and 65 mm.

90 mm resp. 117 mm on the M8 is too long and maximum aperture f4 too slow.

 

When reaching the daily goal in the afternoon I explore the area with the SOMKY and take some little Alpine flowers and mushrooms or in bad weather interesting details and documents in the historical mountain huts.

The low magnification of about 1:7.5 expands on the M8 to 1:5.

 

Here's my last photo with SOMKY - not from the Alps;)

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

a recent shot to share...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sample from today f4. Handheld

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Directly into the sun.... F16.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great samples, thanks. Funny that the other thread currently going about the 90 and 135 Elmar makes several mentions of a lack of sharpness at F4 and being flare prone. Both put out to pasture by these fine examples. Good job.

 

Jonathan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Marc G.

I'm currently using a Summarit-M 90mm and love it but ever since I held the tiny Macro Elmar I'd love to own one of these. Still, I can hardly find the need to switch since the Summarit is that good and the Macro Elmar is so expensive. Such a pity that they only sell them in the set with the adapter (and angle finder?). I suppose the lens alone would sell quite a bit more often. I'd jump for it.

 

Besides, I think the 90 MEM is sharper than the Summarit & latest Elmarit (compared at f/4).

Link to post
Share on other sites

...Funny that the other thread currently going about the 90... makes several mentions of a lack of sharpness at F4...

Not the same 90's. The Elmar 90/4 (right) is rather soft at f/4, but not the Macro-Elmar 90/4 (middle).

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

In Praise of the M-E-M with Macro-Adapter

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

lizard -  KAF-10500 & M-E-M with Macro-Adapter

 
 
 
 
 
.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

.

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 picture detail  -  KAF-10500 & M-E-M with Macro-Adapter (full #60)

 

 

 

 

 

Thorsten

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...