paulsydaus Posted December 17, 2013 Share #161 Posted December 17, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Very interesting... I wonder if this is an RoHS thing...? When was the last version discontinued? Supposedly the glass is full of chemicals and substances which are now either illegal to use or too expensive to obtain and make work. I can't remember which. It wouldn't surprise me if we see an update at some point though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 17, 2013 Posted December 17, 2013 Hi paulsydaus, Take a look here 75 Summilux. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Ecar Posted December 17, 2013 Share #162 Posted December 17, 2013 When was the last version discontinued? 2007 or 2008 I believe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IWC Doppel Posted December 17, 2013 Share #163 Posted December 17, 2013 Erwin Putts quotes production from 1980 to 2004 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGodParticle/Hari Posted December 17, 2013 Share #164 Posted December 17, 2013 i also did a weight comparison of all the lenses you see, will upload the images tomorrow i think most of us carry our leica lens in the leather pouch and i never find the weight of a leica lens including the weight of the leather pouch so i took the bare naked weight of the lenses (including front and back caps) and a second image per lens enclosed in the leather pouch it's only a few extra grams in the end but i wanted to know and maybe some of you do too images coming tomorrow Here are some images showing the weight Weight was measured using a device from a vendor called ADE Germany, who are certified by TÜV and are quite well known in their line of business. Certified with ISO 9001 and ISO 13485. Supposedly precise down to 1 gram Device vendor website for reference - Kitchen scales | Consumer - Produkte-Extension 1. Voigtlander Heliar 75/2.5 LTM - http://imageshack.com/a/img600/327/cxi8.jpg No leather pouch with the Heliar 2. Leica APO 75/2 - http://imageshack.com/a/img843/5347/dnp1.jpg With the leather pouch - http://imageshack.com/a/img843/1951/zxes.jpg 3. Leica 75 Lux - http://imageshack.com/a/img22/9431/p7qw.jpg With leather pouch - http://imageshack.com/a/img822/628/o9x9.jpg Leica specify the weight of the APO 75 ASPH as 430 grams Reference: Leica Camera AG - Photography - LEICA APO-SUMMICRON-M 75 mm f/2 ASPH. -> Technical Data Leica specify the weight of the 75 Lux as 560 grams Reference: http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-wiki.en/index.php/75mm_f/1.4_Summilux-M I'm not including weight of the 90mm lenses to stay on topic of 75mm until and unless someone wants to know? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul J Posted December 17, 2013 Author Share #165 Posted December 17, 2013 Hi, John! My guess is that Karbe doesn't like the residual longitudinal (or axial) CA of the 75 1.4 (red focusing in a different plane than green and blue) at large apertures. http://www.2020mag.com/ce/2020exams/107855/fig4-5.jpg In a B&W picture, it just appears as "Leica Glow." But in color pix, it muddies up the color distinctions in fine details (the blurry red image contaminates shadows with red, while letting small highlights drift cyan). This is very hard to correct for - unlike the lateral CA most of us encounter these days (magenta/green fringing in one direction, without as much of a loss in sharpness). I.E., it is not that the 75 lacks aspherics or floating elements, but that it is the antithesis of "APO-chromatic" performance - except when stopped down. I've had two since the M9 came out - got rid of them both, but only because I didn't want to carry the weight or the value around on journalistic assignments. The overall performance was not an issue - but it did take a lot of post-correction in some pictures, to clean up the non-APO color artifacts in fine details. For the era in which it was designed, it was a phenomenal achievement, matching or surpassing (at f/1.4-f/2.8) slower Nikon/Canon 85 f/1.8 lenses of the time (and Mandler's own non-APO 90 Summicron) - for resolution at large apertures. And one of the sharpest Leica lenses of any type, when stopped down. So Mandler's pride was also justified. You might want to try out the 75 Summarit before jumping - and save many bucks. It definitely shares the same family contrast, color and resolution of the 75-90 APO teles and wider ASPHs. Only limitation is the 0.9 meter close focus limit. And shows that Peter Karbe can also do non-ASPH, non-FLE lenses. A nice 'contrast' (henh-henh!) to the 75 Summilux: 100% crop from M9, ISO 800, f/2.5. Hi Andy, Having tried 35 and 50 Summarits over an extended period I have no real intention on trying the 75. Between the rendering and the build they didn't leave me with anything I was so enamoured by. I sent my Summilux off to be looked at and it happens that something was broken. It came back a new lens and my only real "concerns" are gone. Except lastly for colour and contrast in a continuity sense when using it along side newer ASPH lenses in a series that requite some colour uniformity. I'm happy enough for now as I need other things over another 75, but at some point may buy the Summicron as well. Perhaps, some day, we will see an updated Summilux. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosuna Posted December 18, 2013 Share #166 Posted December 18, 2013 Perhaps, some day, we will see an updated Summilux. I fear it would be a demonstration lens with very high price, just like the Noctilux. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 18, 2013 Share #167 Posted December 18, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Let's enjoy photos of the 'lux 75, it's great, especially in the dark winter months: Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! M8.2, 'lux 75, ISO 640, f 2.0, 1/45 sec., Basel, Suisse, 14. Dec. 2013. Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! M8.2, 'lux 75, ISO 640, f 2.0, 1/45 sec., Basel, Suisse, 14. Dec. 2013. ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/173284-75-summilux/?do=findComment&comment=2490354'>More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 20, 2014 Share #168 Posted January 20, 2014 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! M8.2, 'lux 75, Jan 2014. Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! M8.2, 'lux 75, Jan 2014. ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/173284-75-summilux/?do=findComment&comment=2514094'>More sharing options...
IWC Doppel Posted February 6, 2014 Share #169 Posted February 6, 2014 (edited) I have no connection to ffordes but noticed they have a 75mm Summilux for £1999 which seems very attractive given recent prices. Wouldn't want one of the luxless forum members to miss out ! Edited February 6, 2014 by IWC Doppel Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted February 6, 2014 Share #170 Posted February 6, 2014 luxless yes, then they would be a luckless and luxless 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfhrased Posted February 6, 2014 Share #171 Posted February 6, 2014 Leica specify the weight of the 75 Lux as 560 grams Reference: http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-wiki.en/index.php/75mm_f/1.4_Summilux-M I'm not including weight of the 90mm lenses to stay on topic of 75mm until and unless someone wants to know? It's heavy - but it's also longer than any of the 90mm lenses, and most of the weight is out front. I don't miss the handling of mine, or the ca. (I do miss the bokeh rendering though.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcraf Posted February 6, 2014 Share #172 Posted February 6, 2014 I have no connection to ffordes but noticed they have a 75mm Summilux for £1999 which seems very attractive given recent prices. Wouldn't want one of the luxless forum members to miss out ! Agreed. A well known London dealer has a similar unboxed one for GBP 2999.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcraf Posted February 6, 2014 Share #173 Posted February 6, 2014 I have no connection to ffordes but noticed they have a 75mm Summilux for £1999 which seems very attractive given recent prices. Wouldn't want one of the luxless forum members to miss out ! It's just become mine.....to replace the one I sold 6 months ago for GBP 2999 (admittedly that was boxed, late, Solms). Now the question - should I keep the 75 Apo Summicron? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erudolph Posted February 6, 2014 Share #174 Posted February 6, 2014 It's just become mine.....to replace the one I sold 6 months ago for GBP 2999 (admittedly that was boxed, late, Solms). Now the question - should I keep the 75 Apo Summicron? if possible, i'd keep the summicron. Or was that a rhetorical question? :-) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul J Posted February 6, 2014 Author Share #175 Posted February 6, 2014 keep it! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecar Posted February 6, 2014 Share #176 Posted February 6, 2014 Sell. Replace with a Summarit. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IkarusJohn Posted February 6, 2014 Share #177 Posted February 6, 2014 I sold my 75 Summicron and bought the 90 AA Summicron instead. Useful pairing. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcraf Posted February 6, 2014 Share #178 Posted February 6, 2014 To throw in further confusion, I recently acquired a mint boxed 80 Summilux R ROM for the M. So,that might be the one to go as I can't use it with the MM. Lovely lens though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted February 6, 2014 Share #179 Posted February 6, 2014 I've kept both, at least for now. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcraf Posted February 7, 2014 Share #180 Posted February 7, 2014 Problem solved. After 8 hours with the head on the pillow, decided to bin the 75 'Lux. Sticking with the 75 Apo for MM, M and M7, and 80 'Lux R for the M. Ffordes were good about my change of mind when I called them at 0901hrs, and as I ordered late yesterday hadn't shipped the lens anyway. So last time I looked, it's still there for the next hungry punter. It IS a good price, I'll say that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now