Jump to content

Many Eyes – 2010 ---- Picture Thread


wparsonsgisnet

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Here are my three submissions for this thread, entitled "Air, Land, and Sea"

 

1) Sandhill Crane, a quick preen

Leica II, Hektor 135/4.5, Fujicolor 200 film, 1/100 @ f/5.6, VCII meter, handheld, drugstore develop and scan to CD, light smart sharpen in CS4.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

2) Golden Lion Tamarin (monkey), ready to jump to another limb (the color is natural)

Leica IIIf RDST, Hektor 135/4.5, Fujicolor 400 film, 1/100 @ f/5.6, VCII meter, handheld, drugstore develop and scan to CD, light smart sharpen in CS4.

 

3) Indian Manatee, recuperating from injuries from outboard motor propeller in manatee hospital aquarium

Leica II, Elmar 50/3.5 RS, Fujicolor 200 film, 1/20 @ f/4, Sekonic L558R meter, handheld, drugstore develop and scan to CD, light smart sharpen in CS4.

Thanks for looking!

Link to post
Share on other sites

x
  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Thank you all for the constructive criticism and for the most part I agree. I am happy only with the Sandhill Crane shot as they appear here, the other two I have already improved through post processing but the time is past to replace in that post.

 

I take this to be an overall selection process and, once complete, it is anticipated that there will be guidelines for final dimensions, ppi, and type of file, in which case of course I'll scan the neg(s) in my Minolta DiMage 5400 with the appropriate settings for the aforementioned specs and apply the final post processing settings I've decided upon.

 

As for the rest, those little thingies are called "grain" and is inherent in film, the other is called "bokeh," where it isn't in focus. The rest is artistic license--mine. (Actually, those drugstore scans are perfectly adequate for low-res internet display.)

 

Those qualities are part and parcel of the Leica mystique and I am one of the few left who are shooting film with the classic Leicas and Leica lenses (which are renowned for the most part for the very qualities you--ah--critiqued).

 

That is the fun of it. :)

 

Don

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thank you, Andy, but that is not necessary. Bill and I are the arbiters of this selection, according to the guidelines for this thread: what I decide, I submit. These three photos are kind of a "set," and I'm actually considering using the same hues in each to make them similar. I will spend my time on the final versions after I return from two weeks shooting the Canadian Rockies, Vancouver and Whistler. Right now my thoughts are on packing.

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Final thoughts (I think). Thanks for the suggestions, guys, and here's an improved Tamarin, Andy, if you can replace the previous one that would be great. I minimized the noise/grain in the background and sharpened up the face. I can't do too much more with this "drug store scan" as you've both noted. I planned to spend the time to do the miracle stuff after I unpacked my scanner, etc. [every time I leave this time of year I have to prepare for hurricane while I'm gone, pack up and protect everything valuable] (although in this case it was a "portrait" shot and only the eyes are in focus)(if you believe that and not that my IIIf had a case of pre-focus [since corrected by DAG I hope] the malt's on me) I played around with the manatee shot but I'm going around in circles right now and need to work with layers to bring it in after my Minolta 5400 scan after I get back, and approved before publication. And while we're critiquing this set, on the sandhill cranes I waited a long time for the one in the background to turn around so I could get its face but it never happened, so I have mixed thoughts about that composition afatg. Cheers, Don

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don, no need to replace anything. I'll keep track of your shots. And, if you like, you can change your selection -- just post the replacements in this thread and indicate what should drop off the list.

 

I like the choice and theme. There will be time to perfect your images, as you wish.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I stopped reading after « A Leica body and lens must be used » but i can submit a couple Digilux 1 pics like this one if it suits you. Now the lens was OEM'd by Canon to Panasonic if i remember well so i'm not sure if it is a real Leica lens. In fact i'm almost sure of the contrary. :eek::D

 

ydwgmq4

Link to post
Share on other sites

I stopped reading after « A Leica body and lens must be used » but i can submit a couple Digilux 1 pics like this one if it suits you. Now the lens was OEM'd by Canon to Panasonic if i remember well so i'm not sure if it is a real Leica lens. In fact i'm almost sure of the contrary. :eek::D

 

ydwgmq4

 

The D1 qualifies.

 

Looking forward to seeing your pix.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still contemplating what to submit but there seems to date to be little interest here with few images posted........ or am I missing the point? Or is everyone just like me, still contemplating :confused:

 

Ian, I have 2 in mind and am thinking, as you suggest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks i hope the enlargements won't be too big for my little D1 but why not after all. So i'll submit those 2 pics if they suit you:

http://tinyurl.com/2v8gyza

http://tinyurl.com/24obvc2

 

When we get there, would you do your post-processing in tiff form and I'll collect the tiff's.

 

The book will be 8x10 or 11x14 -- we have a vote coming. If your pix are portrait orientation, they'll be smaller than that so size will be less of an issue.

 

What is this camera, 3.5 mp?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I almost missed this one. Here are my entries. They are all with my M8. Is the D Lux 4 acceptable? If it is, I may change one.

Caryl

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A third. M8/Summicron 28mm

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I almost missed this one. Here are my entries. They are all with my M8. Is the D Lux 4 acceptable? If it is, I may change one.

Caryl

 

Caryl, the D Lux 4 is certainly acceptable. It says "Leica" on it, does it not? We had a poet who wrote:

 

A Leica

is a Leica

is a Leica

is a Leica.

 

And Shakespeare wrote:

 

A Leica by any other name

Would smell as sweet.

 

Best,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...