erlin1 Posted February 1, 2010 Share #1 Posted February 1, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) One thing I like about the new iPad is the ability to import photos directly from my Leicas. This is something I wanted for the iPhone but wasn't available. I plan on using one to travel with. Anyone else? Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/111331-importing-photos-into-an-ipad/?do=findComment&comment=1208538'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Hi erlin1, Take a look here Importing photos into an iPad. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
adan Posted February 1, 2010 Share #2 Posted February 1, 2010 Too bad they didn't just build in the SD reader - as they now do in the iMacs. Also, probably needs a specific app to read/display .dng files. but yes, IF I get an iPad, it will likely get use as my portable image backup for travel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
richam Posted February 1, 2010 Share #3 Posted February 1, 2010 Any idea if/how you can re-export the photos to another SD card for backup when traveling? And how about transfer to your home computer when you return? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotomiguel Posted February 1, 2010 Share #4 Posted February 1, 2010 If it could work with DNG files, It would be very interesting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rami G Posted February 1, 2010 Share #5 Posted February 1, 2010 If it could work with DNG files, It would be very interesting. I would't bet on that one. Apple's philosophy of "whole new category" is extremely unfriendly to traditional formats. Maybe Adobe will come to help, or a third party application, but on the face of it this machine is not for professional use but for presentation purposes. Otherwise it would have been based on os x and not on ipod os. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanhulsenbeek Posted February 1, 2010 Share #6 Posted February 1, 2010 Another problem here is that this kind of transfer is very energy-intensive. I stopped using my Ipod as backup, as the battery was drained before the SD-card was copied. And unless there is a second connection, you cannot connect the device to the net when the connector is transferring your files. I am not sure what the "iPad 10W USB Power Adapter" connects to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicoleica Posted February 1, 2010 Share #7 Posted February 1, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Before we condemn this device, why don't we wait until it's been available for a while, and see what applications and accessories are offered? Then, and only then, can a fair verdict be returned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpattinson Posted February 1, 2010 Share #8 Posted February 1, 2010 Before we condemn this device, why don't we wait until it's been available for a while, and see what applications and accessories are offered? Then, and only then, can a fair verdict be returned. Given Apple's track record.. I'd say the chances it supports leica dng files is remote. It's essentially just a bigger ipod touch, which is a pity because they could have made a much more open and useful device... but that wouldn't be so lucrative. Why don't the ipod or ipad have built in SD card slots... simple... that would make them too conveniently upgradeable... and mean less money for Apple. I think I'll still be going for a net-book instead, where I can even run C1 and PS, so I can push processed images up onto the web while travelling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsrockit Posted February 1, 2010 Share #9 Posted February 1, 2010 Before we condemn this device, why don't we wait until it's been available for a while, and see what applications and accessories are offered? Then, and only then, can a fair verdict be returned. Yeah, people never learn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanhulsenbeek Posted February 1, 2010 Share #10 Posted February 1, 2010 Before we condemn this device, why don't we wait until it's been available for a while, and see what applications and accessories are offered? Then, and only then, can a fair verdict be returned. Nicole, I sympathize with your sense of fairness - and indeed things are hard to learn - but does not this Forum live by bemoaning and lambasting devices even before they are available, let alone that we are patient enough to see how they work after using them a while? If we would live up to your standard, the Forum would be more than half empty Or are you just a wee bit Apple-sensitive? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlindstrom Posted February 1, 2010 Share #11 Posted February 1, 2010 I'll go with nicoleica on this one. And for sure I'm getting one.. As soon as you stop thinking about it as laptop replacement or a big iphone, it starts to make sense. It's a decent "surfboard" that's practical to take with you. You can backup stuff on it via the afore mentioned plugins etc etc.. shoot dng+jpeg with your leica and you're set to check out your photos later on @hotel or something.. remember it's a NEW CATEGORY and should be thought as such, not compare it to old stuff. Also bear in mind that current iphone os was designed for iphone alone (and ipod touch). You can bet your <unnamed bodily parts here> that next iphone os will bring more functionality to it. And also many of the ipad features will make it to the next iphone... </end rant> Yes, I'm almost a fanboy But then again I mostly have pleasant experiences of apple computers and gadgets... I know and understand their limitations and strong points and live accordingly. Like so many here have said about cameras, each to their own. I'm for many parts with Apple //Juha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knomad Posted February 1, 2010 Share #12 Posted February 1, 2010 I carry a Leica when I travel partially because of the compact size and light weight and relative simplicity... and I'm certain many of you can relate to that. That minimalist philosophy carries over to other things as well. If I can carry something smaller and lighter than my laptop that will handle e-mail with attachments, web browsing, serve as a basic word processor, and as a bonus allow me to show high-quality images grouped into several different portfolios targeted at different audiences... that deserves a long hard look. I'll make my final decision when the gadget is actually available and I can hold it in my hands. It will apparently bridge the gap between my phone and my laptop. It's only worth it if it means I can leave the laptop at home at least on short trips. If it means carrying all three gadgets, then that is just an additional complication and then I'd pass. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted February 1, 2010 Share #13 Posted February 1, 2010 And unless there is a second connection, you cannot connect the device to the net when the connector is transferring your files. I am not sure what the "iPad 10W USB Power Adapter" connects to. Even if there were a second connection you wouldn't be able to surf the net while importing photographs - remember this is not a multi tasking operating system. If it works in the same way as the iPhone and iPod, the power adaptor will connect to the same connector as the SD card reader - so you will have to run on the battery while the photographs are being imported. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanhulsenbeek Posted February 1, 2010 Share #14 Posted February 1, 2010 Even if there were a second connection you wouldn't be able to surf the net while importing photographs ........................ I was thinking about the mains (electricity) net, but I suppose your argument is valid as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
melissah Posted February 1, 2010 Share #15 Posted February 1, 2010 Before we condemn this device, why don't we wait until it's been available for a while, and see what applications and accessories are offered? Then, and only then, can a fair verdict be returned. oh thats far too reasonable! best,melissa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted February 1, 2010 Share #16 Posted February 1, 2010 Sander, sorry I misunderstood. It would have been useful if the device had an SD slot and a separate USB socket, but it hasn't, so it looks like it's a choice of importing photos or using it connected to a power supply, but not both. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanhulsenbeek Posted February 1, 2010 Share #17 Posted February 1, 2010 Steve, I am not sure: have a look at the iPad 10W USB Power Adapter: Apple - iPad - Technical specifications and accessories for iPad. Go to the bottom of the page. If that is a separate power supply connector, things look better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted February 1, 2010 Share #18 Posted February 1, 2010 I am not sure: have a look at the iPad 10W USB Power Adapter: Apple - iPad - Technical specifications and accessories for iPad. Go to the bottom of the page.If that is a separate power supply connector, things look better. If it works in the same way as the iPhone and iPod mains charger the iPad will use the same non-standard USB socket that is also used when the device is connected to a PC or Mac. As far as I can see there's only one socket on the iPad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.