pgk Posted January 19, 2010 Share #41 Posted January 19, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) My two pence worth. I'd be as virtually certain that this is NOT a lens problem. Given that different raw converters are producing varying results, all of which show poor translation of the raw file in extreme exposure differentiated hard edges (I suspect that the light area is fully clipped adjacent to the dark edge), I'd suggest that the raw file is being incorrectly 'coded' or 'described' in these areas, which to me would indicate a camera chip/software problem - I'd doubt the sensor, more likely within the internal electronics. If I had this problem I would first contact Leica about it and then email them samples to illustrate the problem. Since no-one else has indicated it as being seen before it looks like something of a one off and Leica will no doubt be interested to find out the cause. Hope you sort it out, and please, let us all know the solution. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 19, 2010 Posted January 19, 2010 Hi pgk, Take a look here The strangest artifacts i´v seen!. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jaapv Posted January 19, 2010 Share #42 Posted January 19, 2010 Another theory that I am hearing is that due to the lens being old (1974) and not having any antireflex coating on the back lens, that the highlights are bouncing off the sensor and back onto the lens, and in effect exagerating the highlights resulting in the distortions. Does anyone have a take on that? Those mosaics realy do not look like a reflection. I see the idea of a failure of the A/D converter as most likely of all possibilities. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pop Posted January 19, 2010 Share #43 Posted January 19, 2010 From the raw file I form the tentative opinion that the problem occurs for a narrow strip of correctly exposed pixels between two areas where the pixels are either saturated or unexposed. The M8 does not have multi-colored pixels. Rather, each sensor dot receives light which is filtered by one of three color filters. The color for each pixel is computed from the raw data by interpolating the values of the nearest sensor dots having the same color filter. It seems quite possible that de-mosaiking algorhithm fails in the particular situation in the image (narrow strip between saturated and/or unexposed dots). Now, if there was a way of "seeing" the raw image before de-mosaiking... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steinzeug Posted January 19, 2010 Author Share #44 Posted January 19, 2010 This from Leica: We must to inform you, that your CCD has some defect. This is not firmware / converter problem. Please contact your next Leica repair service. Not sure what this means, but does sound like Leica think its an in-camera problem? Mike Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 19, 2010 Share #45 Posted January 19, 2010 Oh yes- they think it is a sensor problem, so we all were looking in the wrong place. If I were you, I would send it directly to Solms. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dNorm Posted January 19, 2010 Share #46 Posted January 19, 2010 Wow, I would not have guessed based on my experience with my E-P1. Keep the lens, send the camera back for repair and then test again under the same conditions. I'd be curious to see if the problem got fixed with a sensor replacement. Cheers. -Norm This from Leica: We must to inform you, that your CCD has some defect. This is not firmware / converter problem. Please contact your next Leica repair service. Not sure what this means, but does sound like Leica think its an in-camera problem? Mike Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steinzeug Posted January 19, 2010 Author Share #47 Posted January 19, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Sorry to hear that the camera needs a repair - but there is a silver lining: as well as fixing the fault, the camera will get a thorough service, and the work will be guaranteed for a year (that was my experience when I dropped my camera and it had to go back to Solms). Thanks to everyone for input. Will update this thread when the problem is solved. Mike Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steinzeug Posted January 22, 2010 Author Share #48 Posted January 22, 2010 An update: I was sent a brand new Summarit 35mm to test the camera with, just to be 100% sure that the distortion wasn´t caused by the lens. Unfortuantely for me the same artifacts can clearly be seen with both lenses (although the newer lens is somewhat sharper and has the encoding). I am still surprised that no one else has come across this before, judging from Leicas email they seem to recognize the problem straight away. Does anyone know how long repairs take, it´s not going to be fun parting with the camera, as i only just got it. Here are the 100% crops form the DNG files. The sharper images are from the new Summarit. The artifacts are just as prevalent in the original DNG files and on the camera LCD. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/109952-the-strangest-artifacts-i%C2%B4v-seen/?do=findComment&comment=1196601'>More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 22, 2010 Share #49 Posted January 22, 2010 Most reports say that Solms is pretty good these days, NJ seems to have a backlog. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon M Posted January 25, 2010 Share #50 Posted January 25, 2010 Disappointingly I've just found I have the same issue. Back to Solms... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WPalank Posted January 25, 2010 Share #51 Posted January 25, 2010 Simon M, Careful, there is a very similar issue that occurs when you are using "pre-Intel" Macintosh computers and Lightroom 2.5. You aren't using that combo by any chance are you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steinzeug Posted January 25, 2010 Author Share #52 Posted January 25, 2010 Disappointingly I've just found I have the same issue. Back to Solms... Hello Simon, yes it might be the raw converters/software issues, however should you see the artifacts on the LCD screen before exporting then you will unfortunatley have the same in-camera problem that i have. My camera is now on its way to Leica, and will be interessting to see what they say. Mike Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon M Posted January 25, 2010 Share #53 Posted January 25, 2010 Hi William, Hi Mike, I'm pretty sure it is not my computer - the problem is visible on the LCD before exporting also. Mike, could you keep us updated on your results. I'm working away at present so won't be able to return the camera to Solms until March. Thanks, Simon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steinzeug Posted January 25, 2010 Author Share #54 Posted January 25, 2010 Hi William, Hi Mike, I'm pretty sure it is not my computer - the problem is visible on the LCD before exporting also. Mike, could you keep us updated on your results. I'm working away at present so won't be able to return the camera to Solms until March. Thanks, Simon Will do! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steinzeug Posted February 11, 2010 Author Share #55 Posted February 11, 2010 UPDATE: well finaly I recieved the verdict from Solms today. It is down to a faulty sensor and the CCD needs to be changed. Cost approx 700 EUR plus taxes. Unfortunately no details on how or why the problem occurred. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanG Posted February 11, 2010 Share #56 Posted February 11, 2010 UPDATE: well finaly I recieved the verdict from Solms today. It is down to a faulty sensor and the CCD needs to be changed. Cost approx 700 EUR plus taxes. Unfortunately no details on how or why the problem occurred. Do you reside in the EU? Does 700EUR plus taxes mean + VAT? If so it would end up being around 840 Euros? I thought repair prices were quoted inclusive of VAT. It is hard for me to understand how a defective sensor could resolve everything about an image accurately except for an extremely bright to dark edge transition. That seems to me like a firmware/software issue unless something about the sensor design has been changed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steinzeug Posted February 11, 2010 Author Share #57 Posted February 11, 2010 Do you reside in the EU? Does 700EUR plus taxes mean + VAT? If so it would end up being around 840 Euros? I thought repair prices were quoted inclusive of VAT. It is hard for me to understand how a defective sensor could resolve everything about an image accurately except for an extremely bright to dark edge transition. That seems to me like a firmware/software issue unless something about the sensor design has been changed. Yes with VAT = 840 EUR. I will try and find out the fault if i can, but when i contacted them in the begining and referred to this thread they immediatly recognized that it was a faulty CCD. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanG Posted February 11, 2010 Share #58 Posted February 11, 2010 Yes with VAT = 840 EUR. I will try and find out the fault if i can, but when i contacted them in the begining and referred to this thread they immediatly recognized that it was a faulty CCD. Would that mean that it left the factory defective when the camera was new? Or was it fine initially and then one day started producing this problem? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon M Posted February 11, 2010 Share #59 Posted February 11, 2010 Mike, Thanks for posting the information. Simon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steinzeug Posted February 11, 2010 Author Share #60 Posted February 11, 2010 Would that mean that it left the factory defective when the camera was new? Or was it fine initially and then one day started producing this problem? Sorry, I can´t answer that question as I bought this camera second hand and discovered the issue after a while. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.