dem331 Posted September 5, 2014 Share #1 Â Posted September 5, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hello all, lets see if I can explain this clearly. Â When putting the hood on the 28mm yesterday I noticed that the front part of the lens (the part in front of the aperture ring where the white dot is painted) moved slightly to the right (looking at the lens from the front), about 2mm or so. I can now click it back and for the at will. Â Works perfectly, I am just worried that there is something loose that will get worse. It is about twelve years old. Â Many thanks for any comments-. Â Enrique Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 Hi dem331, Take a look here 28mm M Summicron ASPH small problem. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
wattsy Posted September 5, 2014 Share #2 Â Posted September 5, 2014 The little grub screws are most likely coming loose. Eventually the front part of your lens will fall off. It is a well known problem with this lens. Use the correct size screwdriver and carefully tighten the screws. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colint544 Posted September 5, 2014 Share #3 Â Posted September 5, 2014 It's a well-documented, and common design fault with the 28mm Summicron. The three miniscule screws around the front of the barrel work loose. Â I had the same thing with mine - it drove me nuts having to keep tightening the screws. It was ruining my enjoyment of the lens. Ended up sending it back to Solms, and they fixed the problem. I'm not sure what they did, but the holes where the screws were appear to have been filled in with some compound. I cannot see the screw heads at all. Â Best wishes, Â Colin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvolio Posted September 5, 2014 Share #4 Â Posted September 5, 2014 Can I suggest not using the hood at all. I've kept mine in the box. I suspect any pressure on the hood whilst it is attached to the lens (ie in the bag) and removing and returning the hood to the lens would be a possible reason why this happens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dem331 Posted September 5, 2014 Author Share #5 Â Posted September 5, 2014 Many thanks! I have tightened the screws and the problem is momentarily solved -lets see if it lasts another 12 years or if i have to send it in! Â As for not using the hood, I would love not to since it reduces size considerably, but I suspect i will lose quality of image. Â Thanks again to all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest odeon Posted September 5, 2014 Share #6  Posted September 5, 2014 Many thanks! I have tightened the screws and the problem is momentarily solved -lets see if it lasts another 12 years or if i have to send it in! As for not using the hood, I would love not to since it reduces size considerably, but I suspect i will lose quality of image.  Thanks again to all  Don't care about the hood. It is a common issue. You must just enjoy the lens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Branch Posted September 5, 2014 Share #7  Posted September 5, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Many thanks! I have tightened the screws and the problem is momentarily solved -lets see if it lasts another 12 years or if i have to send it in! As for not using the hood, I would love not to since it reduces size considerably, but I suspect i will lose quality of image.  Thanks again to all  Just paid Leica Mayfair £266 (GBP) to fix my lens with a similar fault. It took 11 weeks!  They did more than just tighten the screws because these are no longer visible, the items attended to include cleaning the aperture blades. I had agreed to them doing whatever was necessary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted September 5, 2014 Share #8 Â Posted September 5, 2014 I fixed mine (well, the one I used to have) myself by borrowing a tiny screwdriver from a watchmaker in my neighborhood. It was easy as pie. Â And I agree that the hood is generally a waste and shouldn't be used. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth3kpl Posted September 5, 2014 Share #9 Â Posted September 5, 2014 I recently bought a 12451 as an alternative. You might also consider the 12466: Leica 28mm Summicron f/2 ASPH hoods: 12451 & 12466 Â Another alternative: Alt hood for 28mm f/2 ASPH Cron | La Vida Leica! Â Pete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth3kpl Posted September 5, 2014 Share #10  Posted September 5, 2014 Just paid Leica Mayfair £266 (GBP) to fix my lens with a similar fault. It took 11 weeks!  I paid Malcolm Taylor a similar amount. It took him about a year Pete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
viramati Posted September 5, 2014 Share #11 Â Posted September 5, 2014 Common problem and all you need to do is tighten the 3 screws on the front ring. If you do use the hood beware of the 4 screws that hold the plastic hood to the mount as these come loose as well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted September 5, 2014 Share #12 Â Posted September 5, 2014 The problem is caused by holding the hood when mounting or dismounting the lens. The torque twists the lens barrel and causes the small screws to rock, and then they loosen. So use the hood, just don't hang on to it when changing lenses. Â Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalArts 99 Posted September 5, 2014 Share #13  Posted September 5, 2014 A 46mm to 49mm step up ring seems to work for me as a hood (e.g., B+W makes one and the lens cap from the 75mm Summicron 2.0 fits the ring; although any brand will work of course.) I find that it shades the lens well enough while keeping it compact (it's a pretty compact lens without a hood) and the 28mm Summicron seems to have pretty good flare resistance as it is.  I did use the 12589 hood (for the Summilux-M 35mm ASPH pre-FLE) in the past but found that it butts up too closely to the aperture ring and makes the ergonomics a little too fussy.  Anyway, this works for me..... Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/233450-28mm-m-summicron-asph-small-problem/?do=findComment&comment=2664648'>More sharing options...
dem331 Posted September 5, 2014 Author Share #14 Â Posted September 5, 2014 Many thanks to all for the suggestions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill W Posted September 6, 2014 Share #15  Posted September 6, 2014 A 46mm to 49mm step up ring seems to work for me as a hood (e.g., B+W makes one and the lens cap from the 75mm Summicron 2.0 fits the ring; although any brand will work of course.) I find that it shades the lens well enough while keeping it compact (it's a pretty compact lens without a hood) and the 28mm Summicron seems to have pretty good flare resistance as it is. I did use the 12589 hood (for the Summilux-M 35mm ASPH pre-FLE) in the past but found that it butts up too closely to the aperture ring and makes the ergonomics a little too fussy.  Anyway, this works for me..... That's a cool idea there. I might try this as an alternative. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted September 8, 2014 Share #16 Â Posted September 8, 2014 The hood is not a lever to mount and unmount the lens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill W Posted September 16, 2014 Share #17  Posted September 16, 2014 A 46mm to 49mm step up ring seems to work for me as a hood (e.g., B+W makes one and the lens cap from the 75mm Summicron 2.0 fits the ring; although any brand will work of course.) I find that it shades the lens well enough while keeping it compact (it's a pretty compact lens without a hood) and the 28mm Summicron seems to have pretty good flare resistance as it is. I did use the 12589 hood (for the Summilux-M 35mm ASPH pre-FLE) in the past but found that it butts up too closely to the aperture ring and makes the ergonomics a little too fussy.  Anyway, this works for me..... I bought one of these and I think it will work great. Need to try it this week. Thanks for the tip. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colint544 Posted September 18, 2014 Share #18 Â Posted September 18, 2014 For what it's worth, I treated my 28mm Summicron ASPH with kid gloves from day one. I rarely used the hood, and I was always careful to attach and remove the lens by the base. It made no difference - the screws eventually worked loose regardless. Even with Loctite on them. Â To my eye, the screws are too small, and much too short. They're so small you can barely see them. I'd be astonished if Leica built a future lens with this type of design. Â That said, I'd never part with mine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
padam Posted September 18, 2014 Share #19 Â Posted September 18, 2014 on how to fix it, an inside screw may also become loose. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunston Posted January 18, 2016 Share #20 Â Posted January 18, 2016 For what it's worth, I treated my 28mm Summicron ASPH with kid gloves from day one. I rarely used the hood, and I was always careful to attach and remove the lens by the base. It made no difference - the screws eventually worked loose regardless. Even with Loctite on them. Â To my eye, the screws are too small, and much too short. They're so small you can barely see them. I'd be astonished if Leica built a future lens with this type of design. Â That said, I'd never part with mine. it really sounds like a design flaw, i am almost buying it, but this matter is holding me back... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.