adan Posted September 13, 2009 Share #1 Posted September 13, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Here are some crops from the jpeg versions of pix I shot in Salt Lake. No post-processing except for cropping. I note that Leica has vastly improved the sharpening algorithms. None of the video-like halos that appeared in the M8 unless in-camera sharpening was turned completely off. I also note that ISO 2500 is extremely noise-free (for the ISO) Shot of the M8 on pedestal: ISO 2500, mixed tungsten spotlight overhead and window daylight, 135 TE @ f/4 and 1/60th (so a touch of camera shake), "normal" sharpening setting. Detail of the "Leica" shirt is from the same shot, in DNG form, that I posted on my original report. 21 Elmarit, ISO 1600, f/2.8, "soft" sharpening setting (according EXIF - I don't know which menu setting that corresponds to precisely). Anyway, for your consideration... Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/96665-regarding-m9-jpegs/?do=findComment&comment=1033215'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 13, 2009 Posted September 13, 2009 Hi adan, Take a look here Regarding M9 jpegs.... I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
elopezso Posted September 13, 2009 Share #2 Posted September 13, 2009 Hi, Is the compression of the jpegs still as it was in the M8s? Jono and I both felt that the M8 colors in the jpegs were excellent & hard to match without much work on raw converters. Of course, the jpegs, due to their compression, were only useable as 4x6 snapshot prints. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted September 13, 2009 Share #3 Posted September 13, 2009 Jono and I both felt that the M8 colors in the jpegs were excellent & hard to match without much work on raw converters. Of course, the jpegs, due to their compression, were only useable as 4x6 snapshot prints. Interesting. I also like the M8 JPEG colours and wished the JPEGs were more usable for serious work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmaxx Posted September 15, 2009 Share #4 Posted September 15, 2009 but the fact of the matter that even with lesser optics, the Nikon D-3 would far surpass the quality of those images at those ISO's Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted September 15, 2009 Share #5 Posted September 15, 2009 Quite noisy compared to M9 raws developed in Capture One. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.