Pedro Posted October 7, 2009 Share #121 Posted October 7, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) +11 What??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 7, 2009 Posted October 7, 2009 Hi Pedro, Take a look here The Digital Solution for R mount lenses. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
rvalarcher Posted October 7, 2009 Share #122 Posted October 7, 2009 what= nothing less than quality DMR will do! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayham Posted October 7, 2009 Share #123 Posted October 7, 2009 +12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
farnz Posted October 7, 2009 Share #124 Posted October 7, 2009 +14. (It seemed to be tempting fate to use the number between 12 and 14.) Pete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrethorst Posted October 7, 2009 Share #125 Posted October 7, 2009 For Leica it's the SL. Leicaflex SL with a sensor. What a beautiful idea! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnelsch Posted October 8, 2009 Share #126 Posted October 8, 2009 +15 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHAG Posted October 8, 2009 Share #127 Posted October 8, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Let's see : 15 buyers in 2 weeks. On a yearly base, that's 390 potential buyers on this forum only for the R10. This forum counting about 9000 active members, that's 4 %. Is 4 % a sufficient market share ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted October 8, 2009 Share #128 Posted October 8, 2009 ...Is 4 % a sufficient market share ? Not far from the Mac's market share worldwide i guess. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHAG Posted October 8, 2009 Share #129 Posted October 8, 2009 Not far from the Mac's market share worldwide i guess. Exactly. I'm glad it comes from you, lct. (In fact, Mac just crossed the unprecedented 12 % threshold in the US domestic computer market.) So, Leica's RD now has no alternative : it should comply. Dear Stefan, what do you think ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchell Posted October 10, 2009 Share #130 Posted October 10, 2009 I'd like it to have autofocus. (So kill me.) But, I'd probably buy it without. Long telephoto and macro. Best, Mitchell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreyCoupe Posted October 16, 2009 Share #131 Posted October 16, 2009 Focus confirmation would do for me--I will be using MFocus a lot, but for some things AF would be nice. I just don't want to continue using my R glass for intriguing paperweights. Although those I am using for artsy wall hangings are beginning to grow on me... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.