vic vic Posted September 7, 2006 Share #1 Posted September 7, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) shenkin street in telavivv mp, 50, fp44 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 7, 2006 Posted September 7, 2006 Hi vic vic, Take a look here two women walking. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
albertwang Posted September 7, 2006 Share #2 Posted September 7, 2006 Radiant and beautiful! I like the pontillism/seuratlike effect that the camera pan has caused. Resembles my favorite painter- Gerhard Richter! More more! Bravo. ps. Seriously I will be the first to obtain a photo book of yours. Lulu time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted September 7, 2006 Author Share #3 Posted September 7, 2006 my god albert - as if u read my thought sometimes - thanks mate :-))) richter is ome of my faves too - sure here - take a look: shenkin i had a crazy day that day - sunday it was. fashion shotings, under real pressure of time, and the settings were crazy etc, and alot of people involved. i have finished the whole process of my side in the same day (including scans and editing etc). so afterwords - just wanted to eat like crazy :-))) gone to shenkin to my fave restourant... alone (couldnt see people anymore :-)) tthe parking in ceter in tel-aviv is almost impossible to find, so u have to walk a bit. all those photos from te link are done that way - fully opened aperture on my 50, and fp4 to add it the look, it was evening already as u see :-) really injoyed when developed the film - "REAL PHOTOGRAPHY BACK" :-))) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandokan Posted September 7, 2006 Share #4 Posted September 7, 2006 Hi Victor Have you considered a tripod :) No really, the panning has given an extra dimension to a normal shot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted September 7, 2006 Author Share #5 Posted September 7, 2006 ha ha ha ravi - i started to run alittle to insure that i will have blur :-)))) didnt wanted to close the aperture so that the shutter will be slower :-))) wanted that full aperture (or almost full, think it is f2 here as far as i rememeber not fully open) :-)) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gverdon Posted September 7, 2006 Share #6 Posted September 7, 2006 Good motion, living motion. I like. Gérald Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted September 7, 2006 Author Share #7 Posted September 7, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) thanks alot gerald :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbretteville Posted September 7, 2006 Share #8 Posted September 7, 2006 Sorry Victor, I get a headache from this shot. My brain keeps trying to get my eyes to focus the image... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted September 7, 2006 Author Share #9 Posted September 7, 2006 ha ha carl :-))))) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterb Posted September 8, 2006 Share #10 Posted September 8, 2006 Impressionistic and VERY neat. Thanks for sharing. Peter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted September 8, 2006 Author Share #11 Posted September 8, 2006 thanks peter :-)) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest agnoo Posted September 8, 2006 Share #12 Posted September 8, 2006 For my taste a bit too shaky. Would prefer a "bit" more steady background/environment and only moving women. btw. I talked to Richter some years ago and he really impressed me. Best, Ronald Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertwang Posted September 8, 2006 Share #13 Posted September 8, 2006 What was Richter like? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted September 8, 2006 Author Share #14 Posted September 8, 2006 thanks ron... i would rather say that it is not about womens motion there, but more about me :-)) usually if i want to catch the motion of one, i tend to make all shrap image of the main subject catched in some pose that creates "continious motion impression". about richter - ya, he must be really impressive personality i belive, i can see it from his portraits :-)) lucky u r :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_lajeunesse Posted September 8, 2006 Share #15 Posted September 8, 2006 super!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest agnoo Posted September 8, 2006 Share #16 Posted September 8, 2006 Vic, i understand, basically i like moving ;-) Albert, talking about Richter reminds of our talk. It was back in 88. The one thing i remember was talking about his time in east-germany and his (later) photo-realistic phase. He inspired me to do the opposite: taking photos in a painters-way ;-) Have to charge the batteries of my little Olympus tape-machine to listen the old tapes - i think we also talked about art-prices ;-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted September 9, 2006 Author Share #17 Posted September 9, 2006 ron, i felt about the same experience with photography direction at some point when looking deeper and deepr into various painters and other visual artists... indeed, richter is one of the most inspiring for me too, but above all, egon schiele :-)) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.