M11 Ev1: why not a rangefinder EVF?

[Steveraw]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I’m a little disappointed that Leica implemented a typical EVF experience found on all mirrorless cameras that shows the user what the lens sees.

To me, one of the main strengths of the rangefinder experience is the viewfinder showing a wider FOV than the lens and providing frame lines for composition.

This allows the user to see what’s outside the frame.

  My suggestion for future models would be to recreate this experience digitally.

I think a small sensor and wide-angle lens added into the camera body to provide the wider view, while the center section within the frame lines would show through the lens.

Your iPhone pro already does this: showing the wider lens view at the periphery while the main framing comes from the chosen lens.

This would provide the best of both worlds and a more faithful rangefinder experience with an EVF.
 

Steve

 

[Advertisement]

The Leica Q3 is available for pre-order at B&H Photo Video and Adorama

[maxpower]

It sounds simple, but it's not. Don't forget the iPhone has a fixed set of lenses (plus a company worth trillions behind it) whereas the M ecosystem has a huge variety of different lenses. Aligning that so it looks nice (and not distracting because of quality difference etc.) is probably too complicated, like imagine a lens that's vignetting seeing that through the lens in the EVF but then outside of that live video feed seeing a different video feed that is slightly wider? that would look terrible in my opinion. Just matching exposure and colours on two different sensors is difficult enough, Apple managed to do it for the most part but other phone manufacturers struggle/struggled for a long time to get that right when switching between cameras. 

They've clearly gone the "easy" route with the final product, but in interviews it sounds like they did experiment with alternative options (even the hybrid EVF and optical Rangefinder) but none of it worked well enough, or fitted inside the body constraints. If the EV1 is a success I hope they would innovate more on focussing techniques for the successor.

Edited 11 hours ago by maxpower

[jankap]

3 hours ago, Steveraw said:

I’m a little disappointed that Leica implemented a typical EVF experience found on all mirrorless cameras that shows the user what the lens sees.

To me, one of the main strengths of the rangefinder experience is the viewfinder showing a wider FOV than the lens and providing frame lines for composition.

This allows the user to see what’s outside the frame.

Steve

 

Do you want to crop the sensor? The sensor is designed for 24 x 36 mm, the lenses for a circle of 43 mm. The lenses offer somewhat more than 43mm, but there the quality can be less (lower than the published lens data). A larger sensor would be the solution, so ask Sony.

One could of course only use the dimensions of for instance  M8 (APS-?). The LCD and the EVF could give the total sensor picture of 24 x 36 mm, but the picture taken and stored as JPG or DNG would be smaller. But then the reviewers would not be very friendly.

The solution for you would be to take a wider lens and crop in post. 🤩

[jaapv]

Leica did patent a rangefinder type EVF years ago but decided it was not possible to make it work to their standards. Of course technology has advanced since then, but it appears they dropped the idea. It worked with a rotating mini camera IIRC. 

[evikne]

They made a cautious and safe first attempt with the M EV1. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they can achieve something like this in the future, but it certainly won't be easy. 

[mikeamosau]

Leica has repeatedly said it’s not possible to build something they are happy with. When I was at Wetzlar seven years ago they said this and Stefan Daniel just this week in an interview said:

A hybrid viewfinder was a pre-development concept, but it rapidly became clear that it would not be a good user experience owing to the low magnification and low field of view. It was a solution based on compromise. 

Remember, in addition to the optical and electronic view there is the third light pathway for rangefinding — we just could not make it work effectively, so we gave up.

and:

It just did not make sense, and we will not touch that again. 

[evikne]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

7 minutes ago, mikeamosau said:

Leica has repeatedly said it’s not possible to build something they are happy with. When I was at Wetzlar seven years ago they said this and Stefan Daniel just this week in an interview said:

A hybrid viewfinder was a pre-development concept, but it rapidly became clear that it would not be a good user experience owing to the low magnification and low field of view. It was a solution based on compromise. 

Remember, in addition to the optical and electronic view there is the third light pathway for rangefinding — we just could not make it work effectively, so we gave up.

and:

It just did not make sense, and we will not touch that again. 

If you read the opening post more carefully, you will see that they do not want a hybrid, but a fully digital solution that mimics the RF experience.

[mikeamosau]

13 minutes ago, evikne said:

If you read the opening post more carefully, you will see that they do not want a hybrid, but a fully digital solution that mimics the RF experience.

Ah! Reading is hard! You are right!! 
haha! 
 

Stick it in crop mode then and pretend Leica did it? 

[evikne]

35 minutes ago, mikeamosau said:

Ah! Reading is hard! You are right!! 
haha! 
 

Stick it in crop mode then and pretend Leica did it? 

I'm not sure how they envision it. 😉 Personally, I'm most interested in a digital RF patch in the viewfinder. That would be a great addition to the current focus aids. 

[FrozenInTime]

4 minutes ago, evikne said:

I'm not sure how they envision it. 😉 Personally, I'm most interested in a digital RF patch in the viewfinder. That would be a great addition to the current focus aids. 

I'm sure an all electronic solution is possible using a cell phone sized sensor at an offset. The processing of the data would likely need to move away from the Maestro 3/4, which I believe is a Fujitsu ASIC, to something with additional data paths. A Qualcomm Snapdragon offering, like Apple phone processors, multiple cores and GPUs, may be up to the task of scaling and merging the sensor inputs. 

Pixii mention "64-bit quad-core ARM SoC" in their specifications.https://pixii.fr/specifications-pixii-max-model-a3410

For the M12 rangefinder upgrade, I think Pixii may be influencing Leica to add similar overlayed data into the OVF.

 

[FrozenInTime]

1 hour ago, mikeamosau said:

Leica has repeatedly said it’s not possible to build something they are happy with. When I was at Wetzlar seven years ago they said this and Stefan Daniel just this week in an interview said:

A hybrid viewfinder was a pre-development concept, but it rapidly became clear that it would not be a good user experience owing to the low magnification and low field of view. It was a solution based on compromise. 

Remember, in addition to the optical and electronic view there is the third light pathway for rangefinding — we just could not make it work effectively, so we gave up.

and:

It just did not make sense, and we will not touch that again. 

Somewhat of a short term statement - never say never, as technology changes; was not a full frame M8 once considered impossible.

Stacked sensors will eventually allow removal of the mechanical shutter; opening up space for IBIS; a change in the inner-body space could also allow longer optical paths for the EVF optics. Higher resolution and larger OLED panels are a certainty. Research is ongoing in the field of light field projected eye pieces.

However, I think Leica sees all electronics and software as unfortunately necessary evils, and would rather concentrate on optical and mechanical excellence.

 

[mikeamosau]

24 minutes ago, FrozenInTime said:

Somewhat of a short term statement - never say never, as technology changes; was not a full frame M8 once considered impossible.

Stacked sensors will eventually allow removal of the mechanical shutter; opening up space for IBIS; a change in the inner-body space could also allow longer optical paths for the EVF optics. Higher resolution and larger OLED panels are a certainty. Research is ongoing in the field of light field projected eye pieces.

However, I think Leica sees all electronics and software as unfortunately necessary evils, and would rather concentrate on optical and mechanical excellence.

 

yeah, I agree. I think this was a toe in the water to see how much dev / cost should be spent on a camera like this. But I am sure as technology evolves it will be something looked at again. 

[Stephen.s1]

As I recall my X100V had such a viewfinder.  It worked just fine for me.

[Lightwrangler]

vor 6 Minuten schrieb Stephen.s1:

As I recall my X100V had such a viewfinder.  It worked just fine for me.

To further cite Mr Daniel: „People often tend to think of another company that offers hybrid viewfinders, but it is important to bear in mind that their cameras possess optical viewfinders and NOT rangefinders with their opto-mechanical complexity. It just did not make sense, and we will not touch that again.“

Please read for yourself: https://chatsphotog.com/musings/f/stefan-daniel-on-the-leica-m-ev1

Edited 52 minutes ago by Lightwrangler

[FrozenInTime]

5 minutes ago, Lightwrangler said:

To further cite Mr Daniel: „People often tend to think of another company that offers hybrid viewfinders, but it is important to bear in mind that their cameras possess optical viewfinders and NOT rangefinders with their opto-mechanical complexity. It just did not make sense, and we will not touch that again.“

Please read for yourself: https://chatsphotog.com/musings/f/stefan-daniel-on-the-leica-m-ev1

The other hybrid approach, different from the X100, would be something like below - replacing the OVF with an EVF, and projecting a purely optical rangefinder path.

The downside is that in EVF + optical RF mode, the main sensor output needs to scale down to the area  equivalent to that of the classic M frame for that lens. To make this work, the OLED panel resolution must be high, and the  optic, including the beam splitter,  between the OLED and eye-piece can fit inside the M body.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!