Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 6/27/2025 at 3:43 PM, jaapv said:

Only if you need controlled DOF for your composition. The perspective is identical This has been extensively discussed and illustrated with examples  on this forum. 

but in the end the DOF makes for a great part the quality of the picture. cropping from 28 to 90 wide open  is in no way the same as using a fix focus 90 mm lens wide opem. cropping from a 28  F 1.7 is the same as shooting with a 90 mm lens at F 6 . 

I still like my q3 28 very much after more than a year shooting 10.000 pictures, but i still miss de DOF of a summilux 50 mm mow and then

Edited by jjroroek
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jjroroek said:

but in the end the DOF makes the quality of the picture

Rather a narrow view of picture quality in my book.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jaapv said:

Rather a narrow view of picture quality in my book.

leica lensen are not famous because they can shoot sharp pictures but because of the DOF wide open. shooting with an 28 1.7 and crop to 90 mm is not the same as shooting with an 90 mm 2.0 

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, jjroroek said:

leica lensen are not famous because they can shoot sharp pictures but because of the DOF wide open. shooting with an 28 1.7 and crop to 90 mm is not the same as shooting with an 90 mm 2.0 

<Bless> 😇

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I bought a Q because of the quality and the “simplicity”.

Because I learned photography with slides I tend not to crop.

Slowly I am discovering how useful this is, and how beautiful it is implemented in the Q. 60Mp helps a lot, but it also requires a change of mind.

For the really short DOF pictures I now have a CL with 56mm/f1.4.

 

Edited by F-train
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

And as a side note to the op: I find the pictures in the M section much better than in the Q section. This has nothing to do with lens lenght, perspective, cropping or dof.
They’re just better. Something with “It’s the Indian, not the bow.”.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, IkarusJohn said:

Where’s the popcorn …

Popcorn doesn't exist. It's just an illusion of an object that appears to be going from your hand to your mouth. 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, F-train said:

And as a side note to the op: I find the pictures in the M section much better than in the Q section. This has nothing to do with lens lenght, perspective, cropping or dof.
They’re just better. Something with “It’s the Indian, not the bow.”.

That's very interesting. I bought a Q3 43 because I thought the posted images looked better than what I was seeing in the M sections.

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 14 Stunden schrieb fotografr:

That's very interesting. I bought a Q3 43 because I thought the posted images looked better than what I was seeing in the M sections.

Thats just because its a long time since I posted my images in the M11 section. I hope that you did not buy the wrong camera now 🤣

  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...