Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have observed a rare artifact in a few of my SL3 images.    Strips of the image running side to side across the narrow dimension of a frame have an artifact that appears as defocused or more likely two sightly offset images from one another.   My guess is that it is interference of two frequencies of sampling because there is more than one of these "defocused strips in a single image.   Has anyone seen something similar and know what causes the artifact? The artifact is rare and seen only in my sharpest images, in this case with the APO 90-280 zoom at f 5.6  and a focal length of 280mm, shutter speed 1150 second handheld.    

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

x

I would agree. Lens stabilization can cause some odd artifacts, particularly with long lenses. There are a lot calculations and minute mechanical positioning. In this case it is both in the lens and in the body, and at times I think it can get caught out in mid adjustment. It is hard to visualize what might cause this kind of blurring only in this area, but I think I have seen IS do enough weird stuff that I would also guess that that is what is going on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree, Lens Stabilization.  I get this or similar issues with the 90-280 and SL2 and SL3.  My issues are more like blotches of out of blurred part of an image.   It also may be the shutter selected. 

In my use, I have pretty much started only using the ES with the 90-280 much past 156mm.  Hybrid is worthless as is mechanical.   This is even on a tripod, as I this lens really needs EFC.  Also the issues for me are worse if I have the camera in the vertical orientation.   I attached two shots, both were a vertical capture, Hybrid shutter on the first, ES 2nd. 

The is a PIA for me, and I do have to check images after shooting.  Had hoped the issue would be less evident with the SL3 and its newer shutter, but not the case for me.  (NOTE this is not wind causing the issue, day was calm and if it was wind issue would be more uniform, not blotchy)

Paul C 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Paul2660
Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Paul2660 said:

In my use, I have pretty much started only using the ES with the 90-280 much past 156mm.  Hybrid is worthless as is mechanical.   This is even on a tripod, as I this lens really needs EFC.  Also the issues for me are worse if I have the camera in the vertical orientation.   I attached two shots, both were a vertical capture, Hybrid shutter on the first, ES 2nd. 

How does it look without any stab? Stabilization and tripods don't always get along.

These types of issues can be a pain to diagnose. It's a bit easier with digital because you get immediate feedback, but there are still a huge number of variables, many of which are unknown. Zeiss published a series of articles on the subject of achieving maximum sharpness, back in the early days of digital. One of their surprising findings was that a cinema fluid head produced sharper results than solid tripod heads. That's not true in all cases, but it's a good example of the kinds of variables involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...