LD_50 Posted July 11 Share #41 Posted July 11 Advertisement (gone after registration) 2 hours ago, Paul2660 said: I guess you disagree? I am curious as to what the advantages are, seriously. SL3-S over S1II? I can see that the battery life of the SL3 -S would be better. But what else besides the difference in body design and layout. I own a lot of Leica but just can’t see much reason for the SL3-S over the Panasonic. Paul Try them. Just about everything is different when using them. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 11 Posted July 11 Hi LD_50, Take a look here SL3 - New Firmware 3.1.1 - That's It? . I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Paul2660 Posted July 11 Share #42 Posted July 11 Good point, I agree they are totally different. Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul2660 Posted July 11 Share #43 Posted July 11 19 hours ago, SrMi said: You claimed that "It’s hard to see the value of the SL3-S vs say a Panasonic S1II" because "the S1II has more features and a much better LCD design." My reason for purchase: I enjoy using a Leica much more than a Panasonic. For me, enjoying a camera is an essential part of enjoying photography. It's hard to disagree with that. Enjoyment is part of the equation. I guess I just see all the features that Leica left out and good have easily added, at least for the SL3-S, the SL3 with 61 MP has no equal with Panasonic. Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
o2mpx Posted July 25 Share #44 Posted July 25 (edited) Given the comments in the forum, have adjusted expectations when getting a used SL3 body by trading in the CL with 3 zooms, to be mainly for use with m lenses. Had thought long and hard about the M11p/d, but since visoflex will be used majority of times with wider and longer lenses for landscapes, seemed best to take the SL3 with the evf, tilt screen and ibis. No plans to buy AF L Mount lenses so the SL3 is more like a part of the m kit, along with the M10rBP, vs another system camera. Edited July 25 by o2mpx Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBB Posted November 30 Share #45 Posted November 30 It's already November, and if this is the SL3 and remains so, I'm glad I still have the SL2 and am strongly considering trading my SL3 for an SL3s. The SL2 for landscape and resolution, and the SL3s for speed. It's a significant investment, again, though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeicaRFan Posted November 30 Share #46 Posted November 30 I do the same in February this year. i haven‘t regretted it. best regards Christian Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CptSlevin Posted December 2 Share #47 Posted December 2 Advertisement (gone after registration) So, what is the state of things with Leica SL3 nowadays? I might need a high res L mount body for a project. Did they fix the blackout of EVF, low-res when focusing, improved AF, etc? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 3 Share #48 Posted December 3 On 11/30/2025 at 4:45 PM, RBB said: It's already November, and if this is the SL3 and remains so, I'm glad I still have the SL2 and am strongly considering trading my SL3 for an SL3s. The SL2 for landscape and resolution, and the SL3s for speed. It's a significant investment, again, though. Why not an SL2S? The 3 has only few advantages. And they are dirt cheap presently. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBB Posted December 3 Share #49 Posted December 3 I had an SL2s, feels like going back to square one, maybe keep the SL3, trade in the SL2 for an SL2s, lots to think about and no rush 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeicaR10 Posted December 6 Share #50 Posted December 6 RBB, I initially "upgraded" to the SL3 and 3S and found both did not meet my requirements and went back to the SL2 and SL2-S due many of the aforementioned posts concerning my "upgrades". Both the SL2 and SL2-S are reliable work horse cameras with no issues. These simply work for me. r/ Mark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBB Posted December 6 Share #51 Posted December 6 Thanks Mark, very understandable, for me personally the SL3 has no reel advantage over the SL2. When using it for landscape iso is not an issue on a tripod. I find the grip itself better SL2 (large hands) and those few extra pixels make no difference and when it is really necessary you can even go to 187mp with the SL2. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul2660 Posted December 6 Share #52 Posted December 6 Leica I feel had a chance to really make a change with the SL3, vs SL2, however I feel in areas that really mattered, they may have missed. IBIS is really about the same, maybe slightly less effective, no new shutter, so the EFC which is so badly needed was left out again. And why Lecia cannot bring focus bracketing to their cameras, amazes me. Pretty standard on all other brands and would be a huge addition to the SL3. Multishot, would have been a Nice addition also, as on the SL2, when conditions are good, it can produce a very nice image. Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted December 6 Share #53 Posted December 6 3 hours ago, Paul2660 said: no new shutter… Actually it is a new shutter, to accommodate the smaller body, and the sound is not as nice as in the SL2 IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrMi Posted December 6 Share #54 Posted December 6 (edited) From @jonoslack's SL3 review: The New Shutter To help keep the size down the SL3 has a new mechanical shutter, it's fractionally louder than the shutter of the SL2, which is a pity. Edit: Some prefer the SL3's shutter sound to the SL2's. Kristian Downling on Shutter Sound and why Leica changed it (supplier). Edited December 6 by SrMi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted December 6 Share #55 Posted December 6 (edited) And he called the new on/off switch “silly.” I agree. Seems Leica spent far too much time on “Leicons”. My SL2 menu approach is fine. I also prefer the grip on the SL2, and find its files more than adequate. The SL3 Reporter looks nice, though; would have been a good option on SL2, or at least a version with black letters and no red dot. The X2D2 has the best look and grip/ergonomics IMO, and a simple menu structure. While I don’t own it, Leica could borrow some design ideas. Edited December 6 by Jeff S 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted December 6 Share #56 Posted December 6 I didn't think the new shutter was noisier - I had the chance to compare them side by side - but as time goes on, I find it definitely more intrusive. OTOH I have got used to the power button and I'm happy with it. The SL3-S certainly wakes from sleep quicker than the SL2-S. The only thing I miss is telling by finger touch whether I've left the camera on or off in the bag. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBB Posted December 6 Share #57 Posted December 6 6 hours ago, Paul2660 said: Leica I feel had a chance to really make a change with the SL3, vs SL2 The SL2 has become an increasingly better camera thanks to firmware updates, which you would expect for the SL3 as well, but unfortunately... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colonel Posted December 7 Share #58 Posted December 7 (edited) I disagree strongly with the statements, mostly from people who are using the SL2, that the SL3 has no advantages. It is fundamentally a better camera all round and totally worth the extra money, which is peanuts in the long term if one buys more then a few lenses. it is superior for the focus (light and day), sensor, noise (at least one stop), dynamic range (at least 1 extra stop - recovery details from shadows on the SL3 is amazing), dial on the top left, tilting lcd, compact flash (more robust, I love them), improved menus, new cpu and overall speed, to the feeling of the size and weight. BTW The light on the on button is very useful for checking various status’s. If you are happy with your SL2 that’s great. I even like using the original SL, which was quite innovative and still gets lovely pictures. If you want to save money on a Panasonic that is also great. IMHO the best AF camera for features its the Z8. For handling, workflow, build and satisfaction it’s the SL3. Yes some of the improvements are subtle, but a camera is the sum of its parts. The package is more enjoyable to use (I am much more motivated with the SL3 to take it everywhere) and gets better results in many situations. Edited December 7 by colonel 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michali Posted December 7 Share #59 Posted December 7 On 12/3/2025 at 5:46 PM, RBB said: I had an SL2s, feels like going back to square one, maybe keep the SL3, trade in the SL2 for an SL2s, lots to think about and no rush This is where I found the sweet spot.......kept the SL2-S Reporter, traded the SL2 for an SL3 (I need the extra MP for hi-res at times), couldn't be happier. I use both cameras side-by-side. I agree with Colonel's points above. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhotoCruiser Posted December 7 Share #60 Posted December 7 I had the SL3 and my SL2 in my hand at the Leica Shop Zürich when i bought the SL2. There is certainly a update and better things, for me some more important than others like the tilt screen. What i immediately noticed is that the SL3 felt a bit more comfy in my hands and that matters to me as i don't use neck straps and my cameras are either (also for hours) in my hand or in a bag. However, this and the other new features was not the reason to fork out another 3K for the SL3 but depending on the new features it may be a resason too buy a new SL4. For some the upgrades may matter for others not so much. vor 2 Stunden schrieb colonel: IMHO the best AF camera for features its the Z8. For handling, workflow, build and satisfaction it’s the SL3. I agree with the Nikon Z8 statement and the satisfaction about Leica , but not really sure about superior build of the Leica. The Leica certainly feels better made and leave a sturdier impression than my D800 or the Z8, but not sure what camera will outlast the other under heavy use. Chris 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now