Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

vor 24 Minuten schrieb jaapv:

No joystick. M  users always focus-recompose. After all, the focus patch does not jump around either. 

If you would read my posts thoroughly and not just respond to them reflexively: I agree on avoiding the joystick. Newer technologies would allow that.

Regarding focus-recompose: That is one of the stupidities that the RF imposes on you. It stands in the way to get properly focused photos when using lenses with a shallow DoF and field curvature (that all Noctiluxes suffer heavily from).

Edited by 3D-Kraft.com
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/9/2025 at 7:11 AM, raizans said:

Meanwhile the Contax G system was introduced in 1994.

I had a G with a bunch of lenses, all superb.  Fatal flaw was time parallax—shutter delay was long, noisy and clunky. Too much mechanical business between press and capture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 15 Minuten schrieb jaapv:

It is a simple technique. Most M users don’t find it a problem to get perfectly focused images that way. 

Yes - and how many of them use a 50 or 75 Noctilux successfully wide open for portraits on an M where the eyes are not in the center?

It was one of the reasons why I sold the M240 after a short time. Although it already provided live view and magnification, the magnification could only used in the center. No chance to get a properly focused portrait with eyes in the midframe of a Noctilux without taking a series of several shots while moving the camera towards the object (or backward, depending on the type of field curvature).

Edited by 3D-Kraft.com
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

1 hour ago, 3D-Kraft.com said:

The A7III EVF is outdated. In today's models they are resolving much better.

But I agree - pressing a button to switch through magnification steps and moving the magnifier with a joystick while loosing the context is not really a good experience.

Today there would be options for much improved concepts like shown on the rumors sites:

E.g. it can use eye-detection and automatically magnify the area of interest, when shooting portraits or animals. This also means, that you are not forced to focus in the center and recompose (which is a typical cause for blur due to field curvature of the lens when shooting wide open).

I can imagine, what the M purist think about this, but those can stick with M9 and M10-D...

Sure - when your domain are landscapes in bright daylight with the camera on a tripod...


that is quite fantastic, especially if an a M mount it had it with lag free software stabilisation when magnifying the point of focus/interest. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 3D-Kraft.com said:

Yes - and how many of them use a 50 or 75 Noctilux successfully wide open for portraits on an M where the eyes are not in the center

Most experienced M users have no problem getting the eyes in focus in that situation. Just a matter of leaning backwards a bit instinctively. Nothing esoteric about it. However if you give up “after a short while” that is exactly the point. Leica M = practice, pretty, practice. 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 7 Minuten schrieb jaapv:

Most experienced M users have no problem getting the eyes in focus in that situation. Just a matter of leaning backwards a bit instinctively. Nothing esoteric about it. However if you give up “after a short while” that is exactly the point. Leica M = practice, pretty, practice. 

This is just a poor workaround, looking quite ridiculous and not helpful when the person is also in movement. But you may be lucky that the person moves the required amount or your natural intelligence helps you to anticipate every movement and field curvature. Congratulations!

Edited by 3D-Kraft.com
Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, 3D-Kraft.com said:

Yes - and how many of them use a 50 or 75 Noctilux successfully wide open for portraits on an M where the eyes are not in the center?

Neither lens is particularly effective on an M. They are 'trophy', esoteric lenses at the very periphery of the M rangefinder's capability and far more viable on an evf like the SL. Anyway they are too big on an M. This thread is going nowhere I'm afraid. 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jaapv said:

First a fake rewind knob, then a fake wind lever. And now a fake window? 

That *fake rewind lever* on the M10D is the sole reason I didn’t buy a M11D. They took it away.

People seem to forget the lever served TWO functions on a film M. Wind lever and thumb support. The second is why film M’s handle better then digital M’s and why we spend $$$ on Thumbies and grips and fill the hot shoe at great expense. The lack of the thumb support on digital M’s is both a design failure and a blatant cash grab.

The M10D thumb support (correct title for you) was/is brilliant. Works perfectly and get out of the way when not needed. But Leica see you’ll spend a few hundred on a lesser solution if they don’t offer it.

Gordon

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, 3D-Kraft.com said:

This is just a poor workaround, looking quite ridiculous and not helpful when the person is also in movement. But you may be lucky that the person moves the required amount or your natural intelligence helps you to anticipate every movement and field curvature. Congratulations!

Not really. This is a valid technique used by M photographers for a century. It’s fast, efficient and pretty natural if practised. I used this technique extensively when I shot weddings with only M cameras.

Gordon

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 1 Minute schrieb pgk:

They are 'trophy', esoteric lenses at the very periphery of the M rangefinder's capability and far more viable on an evf like the SL. Anyway they are too big on an M.

The 50/1.0 Noct and the 50/1.0 Voigtländer are still ok sizewise on the M:

 

They will profit from an EVF-M as many other threads already have shown, that the recommendation is to use a visoflex on the M for them.

But the 75mm Noctilux is definitely too large for the M.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, LocalHero1953 said:

No it's not. It's a small SL with a M mount. Or a full frame CL. Or.........

There's a thread many threads for every one of these. 

SL is SLR mock off. CL is Olympus Pen F digital knock off.

Q is closest to M. If they were able to slap some humongous APO on it, adding M mount is technically possible.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...