Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Has anyone tried out the various 24mm options available for the SL system?  I sold my Q2 because I don't really love 28mm.  I have used 24mm lenses on my old Sony cameras and found it great to work with.  Looking at the Panasonic 24 1.8 and the Sigma 24 f2, but am not opposed to M mount options.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the 24mm focal length, no matter which camera system I use. I have used M 24mm Summilux for years on my M bodies and now for quite a while on my SJ2 with the Leica M to L converter. I have nothing but praise for this combination and would recommend it highly. I find the 24mm focal length at the acceptable limit of distortion, if used with respect. 21mm is always going to give you some distortion, but not 24mm; even for environmental portraiture, I find 24mm is fine as long as certain compositional rules are followed. 

Edited by ivohula
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Panasonic 24mm  f1.8, its a wonderful lens. It focuses fast, weighs close to nothing, and has great image quality.... some images with the sl2s

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

SL & 24 Summilux

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking a little outside the box here, but any thoughts about using the CV 21 1.4 Nokton to have a little wider field of view?  I plan on getting the SL3, so cropping in to a 24mm equivalent would be no issue (It probably wouldn't be an issue on the SL2-S either).  It looks like distortion is well controlled on that lens and it seems to get positive reviews.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dr. G said:

Thinking a little outside the box here, but any thoughts about using the CV 21 1.4 Nokton to have a little wider field of view?  I plan on getting the SL3, so cropping in to a 24mm equivalent would be no issue (It probably wouldn't be an issue on the SL2-S either).  It looks like distortion is well controlled on that lens and it seems to get positive reviews.  

Can't speak for the Nokton, but I have its brother CV 21 1.8 Ultron and it's great on the SL2-S. I'd assume the Nokton performs the same.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would encourage you to go with a native 24mm L mount lens. In my experience the L mount lenses perform better as a whole than M lenses on the SL2. They are all very recent designs, and the Sigma and Panasonic lenses both seem to have excellent results for a very reasonable price. They are not particularly large or heavy lenses either. You get the advantage of auto focus, weather sealing and automatic stop down. The 24mm f/3.5 also focuses extremely close, which is a big advantage over any of the M lenses. I am sorry to hear the report about the 24mm 3.5 Sigma being defective. I have that lens and find it to be exceptionally good just as a lens in general, and when compared to its price it is an incredible deal. I cannot recall having reports of problems with it or the other Sigma lenses other than this one in the thread here. That is very unlucky for Gary, but I don't think it has a particularly high failure rate, as it is a lens that gets talked about pretty regularly here.

I have found it a very appealing lens for its high build quality, small size and weight, and very good performance across the entire frame. It is sharp and contrasty and has good color. The only area where it seems to suffer a bit is vignetting, which is rather strong, but also correctable with a single check box in lightroom. I don't shoot all that often with a very wide angle of view, so for me it is a huge advantage to have a lens that provides excellent imaging quality for a low price and with a compact size and weight. I can toss it in the bag and basically not notice it for weeks, but it is always there and ready to do a great job.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Stuart Richardson
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

My package arrived from B&H this morning and apparently something got lost in translation when I modified the order.  Instead of cancelling the Sigma 20mm f2 and adding the Sigma 24mm f2, they sent both.  At least I'll have the opportunity to compare them and make a decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...