Jump to content

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, AussieQ said:

just answering the title of the post.

 

  1. You dont have the funds
  2. You like to zoom into subjects
  3. You want to photograph high speed sports or wildlife

Other than these, the camera is superb for any other application. I love it. No regrets.

 

 

You believe a lens is for life and a camera is for five or six years. As I do. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 11/24/2023 at 9:23 AM, AussieQ said:

just answering the title of the post.

 

  1. You dont have the funds
  2. You like to zoom into subjects
  3. You want to photograph high speed sports or wildlife

Other than these, the camera is superb for any other application. I love it. No regrets.

 

Also good as a landscape camera?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 10/26/2023 at 11:49 PM, Daniel C.1975 said:

Fair enough. As you said, you are entitled to your own opinion. However, it would help to point out that it is your opinion and not phrasing it as the absolute truth, like „In my opinion..“ or „for my taste…“. … „the new screen design is ugly“ or very simple „I don‘t like the new screen design“ ;)

Enough of smart ass(I mean myself, not you)coaching. I honestly agree that from an aesthetic view the Q2 looks a bit nicer, but for me the new button layout and the very sturdy flippy screen works much better - beside so many other improvements, which again are valuable enough for me to justify the upgrade. Others, like you, evaluate this differently for themselves. 
 

Still, while being a thing of debate, I think the design is still great and the Q3 is still a beautiful camera. Just in direct comparison to the Q2 it is a tad less elegant on the back. But ;) , I mainly use the camera to take photos, not to look at and admire it :) 

I can’t figure out how to buy one…Q3, that is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
8 minutes ago, jaapv said:

Isn’t there a third party charger available, for instance Jupio or Nitecore? 

I have the Nitecore—works well :) I use it as a travel charger. You can plug it into a battery pack for charging on the go.

The only trick is not to completely flatten the battery as only the Leica charger can charge a battery from that state. It appears to be conservative to protect the battery.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Am 24.11.2023 um 00:10 schrieb Mr.Prime:

Just looked at some Q3 images for the first time and I just can’t quite put my dinger on it but I son’t like the colours as much as the CL. True that I only owned a CL for a few months before I sold it (a few years ago) in anticipation of the CL-2, but the CL colours were very much to my liking and I don’t ‘feel’ the same way about posted images from the Q3 yet. It’s just first impressions, I’ll look some more, perhaps it’s been too long since I’ve had a digital camera.

Colors coming from the post. If you don‘t like, use a different profile, problem solved. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/24/2023 at 9:20 AM, -MR- said:

Reasons are many, many negative reports from users, also in the forums here.

There’s only one reason, the Q idea is a nice milk cow for Leica, but destroys all the fun of photography with this auto-everything point and shoot concept. Oh, there’s a second reason, this socalled zoom lens gadget is a ridiculous, infantile way of fooling yourself. If you want to crop so desperately, you can do that afterwards too. In fact the Q line is a blemish in the face of Leica, which built up its good name above all with M photography. 

Edited by otto.f
  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, carousel2050 said:

Battery life is a thing. But the bigger disappointment ist the poor charger. It takes 4h to charge. In camera charging takes 3h. But if you want to go on shooting you need at least 3 batteries. 

 

How much faster are other chargers? The Q batteries are pretty high capacity…

The Nitecore is a travel charger—pair it with a battery block and charge on the go.

also: if you want to go on shooting, you only need one battery—that’s all the camera can take 😆

No idea how hungry a Q3 is compared to a Q2M, but I have rarely needed more than one battery per day…

…but then I take photos old-style: consider each shot, wait for the moment, not too much chimping , etc (I wonder if I am still thinking I have only 36 shots max. The older photographers here will get that 😉) I certainly don’t spray and pray and then wade through a thousand photos for the ‘good one’. 🤣

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, otto.f said:

There’s only one reason, the Q idea is a nice milk cow for Leica, but destroys all the fun of photography with this auto-everything point and shoot concept. Oh, there’s a second reason, this socalled zoom lens gadget is a ridiculous, infantile way of fooling yourself. If you want to crop so desperately, you can do that afterwards too. In fact the Q line is a blemish in the face of Leica, which built up its good name above all with M photography. 

Yeah! You tell them! Go for it!

I will help!

Other reasons not to buy a Q3:

  • it won’t fetch your slippers
  • isnt a Sony!
  • makes you look like an ignorant rich person who knows nothing about cameras
  • they taste terrible!
     

🤣

  • Like 4
  • Haha 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...