huwm Posted October 6, 2023 Share #41  Posted October 6, 2023 Advertisement (gone after registration) I'm using the Panasonic 14-28mm which is very light and for me anyway improves on the Sigma 16-28mm which I tried 1st. When I had a CL and TL2 the 11-23 was a favourite and if I still had the SL2 rather than SL2 S might be tempting for sure. The weather sealed Penny would probably still win out though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 6, 2023 Posted October 6, 2023 Hi huwm, Take a look here Best wide angle for L Mount. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
tripc0de Posted October 6, 2023 Author Share #42  Posted October 6, 2023 26 minutes ago, huwm said: I'm using the Panasonic 14-28mm which is very light and for me anyway improves on the Sigma 16-28mm which I tried 1st. When I had a CL and TL2 the 11-23 was a favourite and if I still had the SL2 rather than SL2 S might be tempting for sure. The weather sealed Penny would probably still win out though. Yes I was just going to get the 11-23 second hand for about £800 but think I will go for this new Sigma lens now which should be about £500 new. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huwm Posted October 6, 2023 Share #43 Â Posted October 6, 2023 I've not had a bad Sigma lens just tend to prefer Panasonic, ff that is for apsc the sigmas seem a no brainer really, weren't around when I had my CL and TL2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruedigerglatz Posted November 14, 2023 Share #44 Â Posted November 14, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 10:06 PM, tripc0de said: Ok thanks but more interested in TL2 and lenses Same sensor 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick in CO Posted November 14, 2023 Share #45 Â Posted November 14, 2023 I've had both the TL2 and the CL (settled on the latter), as has been pointed out they are similar if not identical sensors. I've also tried out the 11-23 Leica and the 16mm f1.4 Sigma and settled on the latter. The 11-23 Leica renders beautifully, is center to mid-field sharp wide open, but needs f5.6 to get the corners sharp. This is fine for landscapes but not for low light. The 16mm f1.4 Sigma is very usable at f2.8, but does require f4 to get the corners reasonably sharp. This can make or break a low light interior shot where sometimes the corners fade into the background. Â The Sigma lens is similar in size to the 11-23, but not a zoom, and the pix can be adjusted in Lightroom/Photoshop to assume the "look" of the 11-23. This is, by the way, my experience with my M10R. Â Faster wide angle full-frame lenses (I've tried several 21-25mm's) need to be stopped down to at least f4 to get the corners sharp. Â A slower lens, f3.5-f4, has only the disadvantage in low light. Â Depending on your desired use, you couldn't go wrong with either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now