Jump to content

leica 28-70mm R lens, why no respect


msadat

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

why is it that this lens gets no respect in the leica line up, and they always go way cheap on ebay. i have one that have not used in a long time since i got my dmr (when it first came out) and i tried it yesterday. the images were sharp, good colors and a lightweight lens to carry around.

 

what do you guys think about this lens?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the main reason is that it is an old Sigma design and has quite a bit of distortion at the wide end. If you like it then don't worry about its pedigree. Leica must have thought it was a good design or they would not have contracted for its manufacture in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mehrdad -

 

Part of the reason for the low parices on eBay is the release a few years ago of the 28-90, at which time many dealers bundled the 28-70 along with R8s and R9s to clear their shelves. I've always had very good experiences with my 28-70, both before and after getting my DMR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look, I said don't get hung up about those things. If you test that lens, any lens you will find faults to a greater or lesser degree. I have probably taken more pics with that zoom than any other Leica lens I own and I have never been disappointed with the real life images it produced. Hey!, when I do critical work I use a prime! I have owned both models of the 28-70. I am a photographer not a perfectionist.

Robin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LCT -

 

When my R8 was film only I used this lens about 65-75% of the time, and then frequently (especially indoors) at 28MM. I can't recall ever having noticeable vignetting, and only on occasion would I notice barrel distortion (also present to about the same degree on the 28-90 at 28MM), and then only in verticals with strong vertical lines near the edges. I got that camera and lens in December 1999, and didn't do any digital (via a D2) until April 2004. Check our site for photos between those dates. Perhaps the Egypt & Jordan set would be the best for you to evaluate with that regard, but remember I am famous for poor scanning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What i'm asking here is how's vignetting and distortion at 28mm.

Good? Bad? Average? What's your opinion as a photographer?

 

I've had two of these lenses - the early Japanese (Sigma-assembled) version which gave me mechanical trouble (the stop-down linkage came apart) and the later Solms-assembled version, which is much more mechanically robust and handles better.

 

Both types distorted noticeably at 28mm with barrel distortion when used for full-frame. This is less noticeable using the DMR, but I still got colour fringes in the corners.

 

I now have the 28-90 asph which is a much improved design - although it is also much heavier and more expensive

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...