Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Have been addicted to Zeiss lenses since my really first (just after a Kodak Instamatic) Icarex 35CS in 1966. Switched to Zeiss on Hasselblad for a while. Ended to Contax with Distagon 4/18, 2/28 and Planar 1,4/50, 1,4/85, all marvellous lenses I do regret.
Turned to digital with Leica Digilux 2, M8, M9, M-P 240, until last monday this week, I bought a Hasselblad X2D 100 Mp, same price as a M11 with 67 Mp. But I got a UV filter... Zeiss !

Edited by Dantist
syntax error :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

x
  • 2 months later...
Posted (edited)

Brand names like "Zeiss" "Planar" "Distagon" "Sonnar" are still addon value in the photo world... and till they are, I think they will go on, whatever be the manufacturer/designer and the final margin that Zeiss can make onto: both those factors can become not significant in the next decades... but I think not at the moment.

Edited by luigi bertolotti
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...