Jump to content

"Goodbye" CM - "Hello" D-Lux 3


andybarton

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

When I suggested to my crack dealer in Manchester that he might consider my trade of a CM towards a new D-Lux 3, he almost bit my hand off.

 

So, when it arrives ('cos he's sold out of the D-Luxes), I will have a new briefcase companion. I am looking forward to it. :)

 

I won't miss the CM viewfinder, but I'll miss the Summarit...

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I have said elsewhere here this afternoon, it is possible for a man to have too many cameras. Apparently.

 

And, given the trade in I was offered, it made The Chancellor much more amenable.

 

(Lunch at Raymond Blanc's place didn't go down too bad either... :) )

 

I'll have no problem with the screen, provided the sun don't shine anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

D-Lux 3 shot, sorry LX-2 shot, of nothing in particular.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice Andy.

 

 

I have a black D-LUX3.

I'm still waiting for that pretty brown leather case to come off of back-order.

 

 

 

I haven't used my D-LUX3 much, but its nice to have a pocketable camera.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

(I may still have some learning to do.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I suggested to my crack dealer in Manchester that he might consider my trade
.........sure thing! we are talking cameras here?....sounds like he would prefer to keep you away from the new garage style amphetamines:eek:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest malland
I really WANT to love film!

But I recently bit the digi-bullet (unfortunately a Canon G7 till I can afford an M8).

Figured I'd use the digi for color and the CM for B&W.

Haven't fired the CM in over 3 months now.

The thing is to love pictures -- I really don't care how they're made as long as they are good. Let people who like to shoot film shoot film and those who like to shoot digital shoot digital. All this talk, inlcuding my posting here, and handwringing is meaningless: it's only the quality of the pictures produced that matters. In other words, film-schmilm, digital-schmigital. Below is a digital and a film picture, but it could have been vice versa.

 

1924842050_07d0418cde_o.jpg

 

 

535767167_1c7d6a5517_o.jpg

 

 

—Mitch/Paris

Flickr: Photos from Mitch Alland

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is to love pictures -- I really don't care how they're made as long as they are good. Let people who like to shoot film shoot film and those who like to shoot digital shoot digital. All this talk, inlcuding my posting here, and handwringing is meaningless: it's only the quality of the pictures produced that matters. In other words, film-schmilm, digital-schmigital. Below is a digital and a film picture, but it could have been vice versa.—Mitch

 

Totally agree! :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mitch...this is the attitude that has over the years overtaken my thinking.

There is a forum over at photo.net...'philosophy of photography'...in a recent thread they discussed whether the family photo album has any significance as a photographic medium. I happen to think it does. Now that few people keep journals or diaries...common in years past, I think that in the future historians will look at our family albums to see what life was like in the past.

This really got me to thinking...will my grandchildren and their families really care what the photos were taken with?...I doubt it.

As you say, the photo is the most important part of the equation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bob, no they won't care. The other thing is that the emotional value of photographs change over the years. What looks boring today, because it's ordinary, will look interesting in the future precisly _because_ it's a slice of everyday life from a few decades before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest malland
...Now that few people keep journals or diaries...common in years past...As you say, the photo is the most important part of the equation.
Bob, I don't know whether you know the photo-journal that Peter Beard has been keeping. Taschen has published it in a huge book the last 3 copies of the 2,500 edition that are still available at the Taschen shop in Paris for €3,000. There are some brilliant photographs that have collages and scribbling around the margin. It's quite interesting and some of it very effective, although I haven't yet made up my mind whether there is an excessive celebrity element here.

 

—Mitch/Paris

Flickr: Photos from Mitch Alland

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...