Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Opinion requested. I have found for sale a mint Leitz Wetzler Elmarit 90mm f/2.8 lens, Mandler design, with a serial number dated to 1965. The price is $400, and includes the original clear plastic bubble mount and cover, but does not have a lens hood. The focus movement feels very smooth like a new Leica lens, and the glass looks to be clear with no dust or fungus. Like new.  My question or concern relates to the probable image quality when mounted on my M11.  Probably lower is contrast and less sharp compared to a newer lens? Would you buy it for $400? My current longest lens is a relatively new Summarit 75mm lens. Comments are appreciated.

 

Edited by Stonewall Brigade
added a photo
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you mean Elmarit 90/2.8 v1 (11129) it is not a Mandler design AFAIK but it is a fine lens indeed. Solid as a tank, its optical cell can be removed to be used with an optical Visoflex. IQ wise it is a bit soft at f/2.8 so it is a fine lens for gentle portraits. Otherwise a sharp lens from f/4 to f/16 with very little vignetting and distortion. Cannot be 6-bit coded.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by lct
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In 1965, Leitz was selling four different 90mm lenses for M cameras, of which two were f/2.8:

- Elmarit (v.1) Wetzlar design and manufacture (not Mandler) - shown in lct's post above

- Tele-Elmarit (v.1) from Canada and Wetzlar, and designed by Walter Mandler - much shorter, with "telephoto" construction (physical length less than the nominal focal length) so that it could still fit in a camera never-ready case when mounted on a camera (i.e. not much longer than a 50mm Summilux).

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

The plain Elmarit (Wetzlar) is considered slightly better than the Tele-Elmarit (Mandler), due to optical compromises needed to shrink the size of the TE so much. But that will mostly be at the larger apertures. At f/5.6 both have very good resolution, but as you suggest, a bit lower contrast due to single-coatings, that are also 57 years old now.

While we are not allowed to formally appraise such things, the price you mention is well within the reasonable USA range for either lens type, if in good condition.

Personally, I have all the 90s I want, but they are both decent "cheap thrills" for experimenting with a Leica-made 90 f/2.8 for the first time (or even for a long time), if stopped down a little. Even on an M11. ;) 

Edited by adan
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Having owned this lens for a number of years, I can attest to it being a fine lens. Will it have lower contrast on your M11, probably slight, but easily compensated for in post processing. As far as sharpness goes, I think, at least in the central part of the image you would have to have an enormous enlargement to notice the difference from a more modern lens...but perhaps the edges might be a little less sharp. However, the price seems a little high, at least in comparison to recent Ebay sales. As mentioned above, a feature I really liked was the ability to detach the head for use with the Visoflex or bellows.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

It is a sort of "fun fact" about the first 1:2.8/90mm Elmarit (without Tele-) that the later production during the sixties was built by Schneider Kreuznach. It was an original Leitz design and the first batches during the 50s were produced by Leitz. Why they gave the later production to Schneider is unclear, and it was even concealed, as the lens originally has a Schneider number on the front ring, which was hidden by a "sticker" applied in the Leitz factory. 

One may easily find a hood (IROOA or 12575) on the second hand market or even brand new as a spare part for the 1:4/90mm Macro-Elmar.  

Since the lens is longer than its contemporaries for 90mm it is generally not much liked and a sort of "Cinderella" among all lenses for the Leica, which is good for prices on the second hand market. I think it's better not to deal too much with its real qualities since this would have an effect on prices one day. So even when I call it my real favorite, let's say it's a rather mediocre lens. 🤭

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, UliWer said:

One may easily find a hood (IROOA or 12575) on the second hand market or even brand new as a spare part for the 1:4/90mm Macro-Elmar.  

Exactly. 90/2.8 v1 and 90/4 macro with their 12575 hood.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the Leica wiki it is a Mandler design

Black ones usually go for a bit more than the silver ones.

I recently bought a nice copy silver version (no haze, smooth focus and very few use marks on the barrel) of the Elmarit 90/2.8 (serial # dated 1961, left one of the photo posted by lct above) for € 250 with both caps, no hood and no bubble. The shop had a black version in a very similar state which they offered for € 400, but since I didn't care about the colour I got the cheaper one. They also had several less nice silver versions (varying degrees of haze and/or bumps) ranging from € 160 to € 220. So it really depended on the colour and state of the lens what the price was.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Other circumstantial evidence:

1) in his Leica Lens Compendium (Appendix B), Erwin Puts assigns the first 90mm Elmarit design to Leitz Wetzlar (and the Tele-Elmarits to Leitz Canada/Dr. Mandler).

2) the optical design of the first 90mm Elmarit is a modified Hektor design of five elements in three groups.

This was not a type Dr. Mandler ever used anywhere else (he had an "inordinate fondness" for Double-Gauss or Sonnar-type designs for longer lenses - he wrote his doctoral dissertation on the DG formula).

But was rather commonly used by Leitz Wetzlar (50mm Hektor, 73mm Hektor, 90mm Thambar). The "Hektorish" 90mm v.1 design can be seen here: 

https://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/90mm-f28-elmarit.htm

Compare to 73mm Hektor - 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

and 90mm Thambar (sorry, low res is burned into the original ;) )

I.E. the 90mm Elmarit v.1 does not match "the brush strokes" in Mandler's known other works. ;) 

Edited by adan
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

As it is my first post, I would like first to thank the many contributors that give very valuable information.

In the page linked by adan above, Ken Rockwell says the elmarit «has a load of flare», even with the 12575 hood. What is your experience with flare from this lens? And how does it compare to the tele-elmarit-M (thin version), which generates more flare than one may wish? Is it worse than the tele-elmarit-M?

@tedd may I ask why you prefer the elmarit to the tele-elmarit-M?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don’t believe everything Ken Rockwell says…. Obviously older coatings are less effective than present-day ones. This lens is capable of very good images. But using simple photographic techniques like avoiding flare by slightly shifting position, using your left hand as a sun shade or even using flare creatively will help. There are some pretty good photographs made in 1955 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not able to cause any flare with this lens (first 90mm Elmarit). 

Two quick examples, both at f/2.8 without hood:

Lamp close at the upper left:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Sun immediately above the frame:

Though according to my intention not to cause any price increase I'll say: yes it might flare.

Edited by UliWer
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did this comparo 15 years ago with an Epson R-D1 but it would not expect significant differences on digital Ms.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by lct
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...