Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi there,

Super excited for my Leica SL2 to arrive and so far I have a few M lenses and want to get a wide/super wide.

so , two contestants : 16-35 F from Panasonic or 14-24 from Sigma ART - prefer the later, has everything I want but not see any reviews or posts about this lens - I would use it for landscapes and some travel shots - and yes, tge 16-35 is smaller and lighter but I prefer the extra 2mm and 2.8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t have the Sigma 14-24 but do have the P16-35. It is generally considered that the S14-24 is optically superior. So if that is your primary interest, the Sigma is an excellent choice. I picked the P16-35 because in addition to being smaller/lighter with a more useful focal range (for me), I often use ND and polarizing filters for landscapes and it is more convenient to carry one set of square/rectangular filters that works with all my lenses. The S14-24 only takes drop in filters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently purchased the Sigma 14-24 Art. Having come to Leica from Sony, I was familiar with the Art Series of Lenses from Sigma. I had previously owned the Leica 16-35 which is a fine lens but found it much too heavy to carry as well as being expensive. The Sigma 14-24 Art performs outstandingly well on the SL2. The constant 2.8 aperture and image resolution sold me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites


The Sigma 14-24/2.8 DG DN is very sharp, even wide open. It’s really great for astrophotography but I find the bulbous front element is too prone to lens flare when shooting on bright sunny days.

Optically, it is as good, if not better than the Leica 16-35 SL but I only use the Sigma for astro and stick with the 16-35 SL for daylight shooting because it handles flare much better.

Sigma 14-24 DG DN

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by beewee
  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

A very good lense. Using this to save wight end go less bulky when needed and go wider than my Leica 16-35. A perfect choise for the SL.

 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a very good lens, I not a wide angle person, for landscape I use 24-90 most of the time, if I'm running out of space then I take the sigma.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The lens works well with my SL2.  A fun aspect of the 14mm focal length is that it covers most of the outer ring of a double rainbow.  Lightroom's corrections work pretty well.  This image has -100 Vertical Transform applied as well as Lightroom's corrections for this lens.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Manicouagan1 said:

The lens works well with my SL2.  A fun aspect of the 14mm focal length is that it covers most of the outer ring of a double rainbow.  Lightroom's corrections work pretty well.  This image has -100 Vertical Transform applied as well as Lightroom's corrections for this lens.

Why didn't you use Leica's Perspective Correction?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like this lens:            Mostar

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by jannes
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sometimes it annoys me to death that people start threads, ask questions and then the "final followup" isnt there.

Guess I felt for that trap on my own thread :)

So in the end, I caved in and bough the Sigma Art 14-24 because of few reasons : 

- was a store demo. price was unbelievable good.
- I did a test drive with it to ensure the weight was manageable ( hey, I'm a 20+ years Leica M shooter, everything in the SL seems humongus, that said, I had a S2 once lol ) and it was - while not the most featherweight thing, it balances well
- with the test drive two things were clear : the glass is perfect at any focal lenght and the focus is fast
- I want to do astro so the 2.8 is a big plus.

So there we go, I bought it.

Fast foward now three weeks of getting it ( and being so far the only SL lens apart from the 45mm which I'm somewhat of some sort happy with , until my SL35 doesn't arrive ) I'm very very happy with the image quality I get from it - super sharp in corners , great pop, lovely AF.

The only complain is not having a front filter system - I got lucky and found a store selling the last Haida rear filters complete in a promotion, so I got them - didnt used them yet, will report back.

But so far, the picture quality is superb - very very happy with it.  Here's a photo of my son on his birthday few days ago : picture isn't the most interesting photo material ( for you, for me its precious :D ) but you can judge what this lens does in real world scenario - overcast, 14mm focal lenght, f4.0, 1/80 and ISO 200 : 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

It’s a wonderful lens that I find hard to use well given that I tend to use it at the wider end since for 24mm I use the 24-90mm. 
 

But I do not find that it flares as much as I would expect. Here is a test shot at 19mm:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

If you're looking for an ultrawide prime in an L mount, there's also the option of 14mm/1.8 Sigma.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...