Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I suppose that some chrome plating might wear off after a few decades of constant handling if the user perspired sulfuric acid or had skin roughness and hardness equivalent to 100 grit sand paper.

Edited by BradS
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, williamj said:

I had another look at the Garry Winogrand documentary of 1982 on YT. By this point if he was responsible for the brassing it should show because he passed away in 1984 as noted above. I know this isn't 4K so we can't be definitive but I can't see any obvious brassing on the camera. It could be that the brassing was due to some other factor after he stopped using it. The fact that some people have questioned the wear pattern on the camera as being unrealistic may in fact be valid.

.

Winogrand probably owned more than one silver chrome M4 in his lifetime.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BradS said:

I suppose that some chrome plating might wear off after a few decades of constant handling if the user perspired sulfuric acid or had skin roughness and hardness equivalent to 100 grit sand paper.

Last weekend I went hiking in the snow up in the mountains.  I took my MdA because I knew I didn’t need a rangefinder Leica.  The pics would be wide angle infinity type things.


Well, one thing led to another and I took a hard fall with the camera hitting ice and rocks. 
Not a single mark on it.  Not a scratch or knick.

 In the past I’ve owned Bessa L, R3A, Zeiss Ikon ZM and I can tell you those cameras would have been messed up.  So for those people who think Leica’s build and construction techniques are unnecessarily heavy, and that using brass is gratuitous, well they do that because that is how you build a camera to last.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BradS said:

I suppose that some chrome plating might wear off after a few decades of constant handling if the user perspired sulfuric acid or had skin roughness and hardness equivalent to 100 grit sand paper.

But it isn’t a wild idea to consider it. There are a lot of instances where the finish of a guitar is influenced as much by the acid sweat of the user as general wear. Just to name three there is Rory Gallagher, Stevie Ray Vaughan and Bruce Springsteen who’s iconic Fender guitars all took an extra hit because they are usually used the entirety of the set and not swapped out for other guitars along the way. Not only do the chrome plated components suffer from sweat but also the paint. It’s a well documented example of heavy wear, and the way Winogrand used his camera is not so far away from gigging every night.

Edited by 250swb
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Huss said:

Last weekend I went hiking in the snow up in the mountains.  I took my MdA because I knew I didn’t need a rangefinder Leica.  The pics would be wide angle infinity type things.


Well, one thing led to another and I took a hard fall with the camera hitting ice and rocks. 
Not a single mark on it.  Not a scratch or knick.

 In the past I’ve owned Bessa L, R3A, Zeiss Ikon ZM and I can tell you those cameras would have been messed up.  So for those people who think Leica’s build and construction techniques are unnecessarily heavy, and that using brass is gratuitous, well they do that because that is how you build a camera to last.

I do love the build of the M’s.  I have also owned a Bessa and agree it is not even close to the same build quality.  The Bessa build feels like a mid level japanese SLR.

I think the main reason for the M camera durability is the extra thick die cast aluminium chassis rather than the brass top and base plates. Aluminium is heavy if it is cast with thick walls.  The bottom opening design also adds to the rigidity.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, williamj said:

I had another look at the Garry Winogrand documentary of 1982 on YT. By this point if he was responsible for the brassing it should show because he passed away in 1984 as noted above. I know this isn't 4K so we can't be definitive but I can't see any obvious brassing on the camera. It could be that the brassing was due to some other factor after he stopped using it. The fact that some people have questioned the wear pattern on the camera as being unrealistic may in fact be valid.

.

Really? Exactly when in this video can you get a close up view of the bottom corner under his right hand that we see in the photos at post #11 (with the small dent and so called extreme wear)?

Even if the camera in the video and that in the photos is the same, the video offers absolutely no confirmation or repudiation of the authenticity of the wear in the photo IMHO. These theories of artificially accelerated wear are, quite frankly, nothing more or better than hysterical conspiracy theories.
 

Just because there are some people who deliberately enhance the wear on their Leicas in the electronic media saturation of the 21st century doesn’t mean that anyone had any interest in doing that whatsoever in the 1980s.

 

 

Edited by Mute-on
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

8 hours ago, Mute-on said:

Really? Exactly when in this video can you get a close up view of the bottom corner under his right hand that we see in the photos at post #11 (with the small dent and so called extreme wear)?

Even if the camera in the video and that in the photos is the same, the video offers absolutely no confirmation or repudiation of the authenticity of the wear in the photo IMHO. These theories of artificially accelerated wear are, quite frankly, nothing more or better than hysterical conspiracy theories.
 

Just because there are some people who deliberately enhance the wear on their Leicas in the electronic media saturation of the 21st century doesn’t mean that anyone had any interest in doing that whatsoever in the 1980s.

 

 

We could speculate on this for ever and never come up with the definitive answer. My feeling, as I have stated before, is that Gary had nothing to do with the rather strange wear and the puzzling pressure plate marks, but these occurred in the 19 years after his death in 1984 and before the photos were taken in 2003. We will probably never know.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Matlock said:

You will have to wait a while to find out as the M-A has only been available since 2014. 

I was taking the p!ss. Obviously no-one will ever use the camera in those conditions for that long. My 62 year old M3 has zero brassing.  

For those that want brassing, the black paint version is the one to get.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Matlock said:

 We will probably never know.

Well, here's a free tip for any camera/photography magazine journo: maybe do a bit of investigative journalism, interview the persons in question, and find out what happened to Garry's camera or multiple cameras (it was stated somewhere that he has been seen with two silver m4s, in addition to others). 

Often, to many mysteries there are perfectly natural and understandable explanations. Also in that case, this would make an interesting piece, and one that I would read.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Authentic brassing on a 1956 DS M3. The only *other* brassing on the camera is on the rewind knob, photo on request. The camera is not collector grade, with dents and scuff marks but intact vulcanite.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 11/16/2022 at 9:44 PM, kivis said:

Will the M-A ever brass?

Yes, of course the M-A will brass. 

It just needs a little help, that's all -

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Herr Barnack said:

Yes, of course the M-A will brass. 

It just needs a little help, that's all -

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

So you would recommend a belt sander over an orbital?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The suggestion of a belt or orbital sander is ridiculous, and you lot should be ashamed of yourselves.

For natural patina, it needs to be where you touch the camera in use.  This is why I recommend a thin pair of gloves with fine grit sand paper attached to the finger pad areas.  As you use your camera, the inevitable brassing is just accelerated.  And you will get a realistic finish.

  • Haha 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Huss said:

The suggestion of a belt or orbital sander is ridiculous, and you lot should be ashamed of yourselves.

For natural patina, it needs to be where you touch the camera in use.  This is why I recommend a thin pair of gloves with fine grit sand paper attached to the finger pad areas.  As you use your camera, the inevitable brassing is just accelerated.  And you will get a realistic finish.

All of us in these parts are ashamed of ourselves - profoundly ashamed, as are our friends and families.  $9000 cameras fitted with $7000 lenses - "Madness, I say! Sheer madness!!"

Here's hoping COOPH will take your idea of gloves with sandpaper fingertips and run with it.  "Leica M photographer gloves" or some such marketing shinola.  Perhaps there will even be a matching sandpaper covered rope camera strap...

Edited by Herr Barnack
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2022 at 4:32 PM, Mute-on said:


 

Just because there are some people who deliberately enhance the wear on their Leicas in the electronic media saturation of the 21st century doesn’t mean that anyone had any interest in doing that whatsoever in the 1980s.

 

 

Spot on....only in today's craze. Of course to be fair...anytime in history had their share of crazes; brass showing or whatever. jim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...