I've made some changes

[kivis]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Yes, back to basics. Sold everything digital (except my iPhone). Left with the M-A and a gaggle of great lenses; 21-35-50-90. I am now at peace ( with my photographic self). 🤗

[ktmrider2]

For Leica I did the same keeping my anniversary M4 with 35/50/90/135 focal length lenses.  For digital I kept a FujiX100f so have not gone totally back to basics.  I find it much simpler to accept the limitations of film and not worry about owning the latest and greatest (and most expensive) digital body.  Now if only I could do what I have done with photography equipment with multiple motorcycles, life would be much simpler.

Life is so much simpler when everything I need can be put in a backpack for travel while keeping excess resources in a bank account. 

Edited June 28, 2022 by ktmrider2
added comment

[Ouroboros]

I don't see why shooting film only is 'going back to basics', you could easily say the same about having only one digital camera and a lens or two but it still takes skill and experience to get the best from either medium.  What the op has done is restrict his options and I would agree it can be liberating.

I like having the choice of film cameras of different formats and a couple of digital cameras for several reasons but carrying too much equipment can lead to  confusion, so my idea sticking to basics is to go out with a plan and a camera that is best suited to what I want to achieve. 

Yesterday it was an M10-R, today it's a Fuji GW690iii.  

[Huss]

4 hours ago, kivis said:

Yes, back to basics. Sold everything digital (except my iPhone). Left with the M-A and a gaggle of great lenses; 21-35-50-90. I am now at peace ( with my photographic self). 🤗

I would have kept a digital camera to scan the film with.

[ianman]

4 hours ago, ktmrider2 said:

Now if only I could do what I have done with photography equipment with multiple motorcycles

You mean buy a Penny-Farthing?

[Graham (G4FUJ)]

To really go back to basics, surely one should have a large format  camera using glass plates

[kivis]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

8 minutes ago, Graham (G4FUJ) said:

To really go back to basics, surely one should have a large format  camera using glass plates

maybe for some, but I have only used 35mm cameras since I was 14 years old, so that's the basics for me.

[oldwino]

As Orson Welles put it, "the absence of limitations is the enemy of Art." 

[JoshuaR]

On 6/28/2022 at 10:07 AM, kivis said:

Yes, back to basics. Sold everything digital (except my iPhone). Left with the M-A and a gaggle of great lenses; 21-35-50-90. I am now at peace ( with my photographic self). 🤗

What about film stock? Have you simplified there as well? 

I’m always drawn to the idea of standardizing on one stock, like Tri-X, and then never thinking about it again. I’ve been slowly gearing up for my own “back to basics” approach, which might be something like HP5 on 35mm and Portra on 120…..

[Huss]

On 6/29/2022 at 1:42 PM, oldwino said:

As Orson Welles put it, "the absence of limitations is the enemy of Art." 

Ironically he said that at an all you can eat buffet.

[kivis]

5 hours ago, JoshuaRothman said:

What about film stock? Have you simplified there as well? 

I’m always drawn to the idea of standardizing on one stock, like Tri-X, and then never thinking about it again. I’ve been slowly gearing up for my own “back to basics” approach, which might be something like HP5 on 35mm and Portra on 120…..

Tri-X!