Ray Vonn Posted June 30, 2022 Share #41 Posted June 30, 2022 Advertisement (gone after registration) @vonrozen, I fear for you potentially going into a bottomless pit of threads giving you more and more issues and alternatives, resulting in doubts which make your decision ever more difficult. There will always be a (relevant and not so relevant) reasons not to buy a particular lens, from members whose interest is collecting lenses as much as actually using them and this may not always helpful in a thread like this. Honestly, if *any* lens get your attention, make a point of going to the seller with your camera, try it and if *you* like how it renders, buy it. As I said, if it is a properly maintained Leitz/ Leica lens, it will be good. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 30, 2022 Posted June 30, 2022 Hi Ray Vonn, Take a look here King of Bookeh or something else ?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
lct Posted June 30, 2022 Share #42 Posted June 30, 2022 1 hour ago, vonrozen said: to be honest it is so stressful to buy a Summicron, I think I will consider as an alternative the Leica M 2.8/35mm Summaron , which may be just as suitable but cheaper and always made in Germany (!) especially as i tend to shoot at f16 or 22 with long pauses , etc . If you're on a budget, you may wish to consider a new or like-new Zeiss Biogon 35/2.8 which is one of the best 35/2.8 lenses ever made instead of buying an ancient Leica lens with scratches on the front element if you ask me but YMMV . 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedaes Posted June 30, 2022 Share #43 Posted June 30, 2022 (edited) 41 minutes ago, lct said: with scratches on the front element ..and haze on the internal ones (irrespective of what the seller says). Totally agree about Zeiss Biogon - be quick and you might find a new one. Edited June 30, 2022 by pedaes 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pippy Posted June 30, 2022 Share #44 Posted June 30, 2022 6 hours ago, vonrozen said: ...I tend to shoot at f16 or 22... Don't! Unless, of course, you really need an enormous amount of depth-of-field... As Arnaud has already written in the post which immediately followed yours; if you shoot at f16/f22 the resultant images will be MUCH softer than had they been shot at f11 due to diffraction. I also agree with what Ray Vonn says in post #41 in that you could find yourself spiralling into a bottomless pit unless you take a step back and really give some serious consideration to your position. There is a very good reason as to why the 35mm Summicron - of all versions - has been held in such high regard by so many photographers for over six decades. Good luck. Philip. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now