IkarusJohn Posted November 27, 2021 Share #21 Ā Posted November 27, 2021 Advertisement (gone after registration) 1 hour ago, mmradman said: Look like one happy customer. Not sure, Mladen. Ā At first, I thought it was front focusing with the OVF by about 30mm. Ā But then I looked at the 0.95 Noct at f/0.95 and it was bang on. I put the difference with the 28 Summilux down to user error. Ā The two images above are heavily cropped, so I donāt think I have a real problem - happy camper! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 27, 2021 Posted November 27, 2021 Hi IkarusJohn, Take a look here 28 Lux prone to misalignment. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
dkmoore Posted November 27, 2021 Author Share #22 Ā Posted November 27, 2021 13 hours ago, IkarusJohn said: Okay, so I set up my M10-D on a tripod, angled at about 45Āŗ pretty much at minimum focusing distance, f/1.4. First with OVF Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image hereā¦ Simply register for free here ā We are always happy to welcome new members! Then with EVF What size paper is the test chart printed on? glad your copy is good! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkmoore Posted November 27, 2021 Author Share #23 Ā Posted November 27, 2021 13 hours ago, IkarusJohn said: Not sure, Mladen. Ā At first, I thought it was front focusing with the OVF by about 30mm. Ā But then I looked at the 0.95 Noct at f/0.95 and it was bang on. I put the difference with the 28 Summilux down to user error. Ā The two images above are heavily cropped, so I donāt think I have a real problem - happy camper! Can the cold cause the metal to change slightly enough to cause temporary focus issues? I tested this morning and got completely different results. (not because of testing differences, etc). The issue I saw in DC was VERY obvious. Please forgive the less than scientific means. I was doing this in a hurry.Ā Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image hereā¦ Simply register for free here ā We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here ā We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/326912-28-lux-prone-to-misalignment/?do=findComment&comment=4321366'>More sharing options...
dkmoore Posted November 27, 2021 Author Share #24 Ā Posted November 27, 2021 (edited) The above looks ok. Now, I slightly different setup and the focus is on the back of the h. The focus appears to be ok but the area of focus is mostly behind the H. Massive crops.Ā Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image hereā¦ Simply register for free here ā We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited November 27, 2021 by dkmoore Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here ā We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/326912-28-lux-prone-to-misalignment/?do=findComment&comment=4321368'>More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted November 27, 2021 Share #25 Ā Posted November 27, 2021 Value of sir camera comes through. Ā Ā All my lenses, fast and slow, 50mm & up, focus perfectly On m8, M10, M10R. Ā M9 sensor bit the dust. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IkarusJohn Posted November 27, 2021 Share #26 Ā Posted November 27, 2021 4 hours ago, dkmoore said: What size paper is the test chart printed on? glad your copy is good! A4, so the image is cropped ā¦ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tightsqueez Posted November 28, 2021 Share #27 Ā Posted November 28, 2021 Advertisement (gone after registration) On 11/26/2021 at 6:01 PM, IkarusJohn said: Okay, so I set up my M10-D on a tripod, angled at about 45Āŗ pretty much at minimum focusing distance, f/1.4. First with OVF Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image hereā¦ Simply register for free here ā We are always happy to welcome new members! Then with EVF Even with these low rez images I can tell these are considerably off. The OVF is front focusing quite a bit. What's funny is that 99% of users would never know that it existed because in real life external factors (e.g. subject movement) impact focus more. If you look for problems, guess what... you'll find them.Ā 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IkarusJohn Posted November 28, 2021 Share #28 Ā Posted November 28, 2021 1 minute ago, tightsqueez said: Even with these low rez images I can tell these are considerably off. The OVF is front focusing quite a bit. What's funny is that 99% of users would never know that it existed because in real life external factors (e.g. subject movement) impact focus more. If you look for problems, guess what... you'll find them.Ā True ā¦ if you look ā¦ 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkmoore Posted November 28, 2021 Author Share #29 Ā Posted November 28, 2021 Mine was noticeable. I tried again today with the kids at the tree farm and itās not usableĀ at 1.4.Ā 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now